Literature DB >> 22451830

Osseointegrated implant applications in cosmetic and functional skull base rehabilitation.

Brent J Benscoter1, James J Jaber, Matthew L Kircher, Sam J Marzo, John P Leonetti.   

Abstract

This study discusses the indications, outcomes, and complications in patients that underwent osseointegrated implantation for skull base rehabilitation. We conducted a retrospective review of eight patients with skull base defects who had undergone implantation of a facial prosthetic retention device ± bone-anchored hearing aid at a tertiary academic referral center. Descriptive analysis of applications, techniques, outcomes, and complications were reviewed. The majority of patients were males (n = 6) with previously diagnosed skull base malignancy (n = 5) with an average age of 46 (range, 14 to 77). All patients received an implanted facial prosthetic device either for an aural (n = 7) or orbital (n = 1) prosthesis. There were only two complications that included infection (n = 1) and implant extrusion (n = 1). Osseointegrated implantation of abutments for anchoring prosthetic devices in patients for skull base rehabilitation provides an excellent cosmetic option with minimal complications.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Craniofacial implants; bone-anchored hearing aid; facial prosthesis; rehabilitation; skull base

Year:  2011        PMID: 22451830      PMCID: PMC3312135          DOI: 10.1055/s-0031-1284211

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Skull Base        ISSN: 1531-5010


  12 in total

1.  Evaluation of implant losses and skin reactions around extraoral bone-anchored implants: A 0- to 8-year follow-up.

Authors:  R A Reyes; A Tjellström; G Granström
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 3.497

Review 2.  Placement of dental implants in irradiated bone: the case for using hyperbaric oxygen.

Authors:  Gösta Granström
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 1.895

3.  Treatment outcome of bone-anchored craniofacial prostheses after tumor surgery.

Authors:  P J Schoen; G M Raghoebar; R P van Oort; H Reintsema; B F van der Laan; F R Burlage; J L Roodenburg; A Vissink
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2001-12-15       Impact factor: 6.860

4.  Intra-osseous anchorage of dental prostheses. I. Experimental studies.

Authors:  P I Brånemark; R Adell; U Breine; B O Hansson; J Lindström; A Ohlsson
Journal:  Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1969

5.  The bone-anchored hearing aid. Design principles, indications, and long-term clinical results.

Authors:  A Tjellström; B Håkansson
Journal:  Otolaryngol Clin North Am       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 3.346

6.  Osseointegration in irradiated cancer patients: an analysis with respect to implant failures.

Authors:  Gösta Granström
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 1.895

7.  Studies in the radiobiology of osteoradionecrosis and their clinical significance.

Authors:  R E Marx; R P Johnson
Journal:  Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol       Date:  1987-10

8.  Osseointegrated implants in irradiated bone: a case-controlled study using adjunctive hyperbaric oxygen therapy.

Authors:  G Granström; A Tjellström; P I Brånemark
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 1.895

9.  Auricular repair with autogenous rib cartilage grafts: two decades of experience with 600 cases.

Authors:  B Brent
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 4.730

10.  Osseointegrated alloplastic versus autogenous ear reconstruction: criteria for treatment selection.

Authors:  G H Wilkes; J F Wolfaardt
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 4.730

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.