Literature DB >> 15133194

Thermal adaptation in Drosophila serrata under conditions linked to its southern border: unexpected patterns from laboratory selection suggest limited evolutionary potential.

Andréa Magiafoglou1, Ary Hoffmann.   

Abstract

To investigate the ability of Drosophila serrata to adapt to thermal conditions over winter at the species southern border, replicate lines from three source locations were held as discrete generations over three years at either 19 degrees C (40 generations) or temperatures fluctuating between 7 degrees C and 18 degrees C (20 generations). Populations in the fluctuating environment were maintained either with an adult 0 degrees C cold shock or without a shock. These conditions were expected to result in temperature-specific directional selection for increased viability and productivity under both temperature regimes, and reduced development time under the fluctuating-temperature regime. Selection responses of all lines were tested under both temperature regimes after controlling for carry-over effects by rearing lines in these environments for two generations. When tested in the 19 degrees C environment, lines evolving at 19 degrees C showed a faster development time and a lower productivity relative to the other lines, while cold shock reduced development time and productivity of all lines. When tested in the fluctuating environment, productivity of the 7-18 degrees C lines selected with a cold shock was relatively lower than that of lines selected without a shock, but this pattern was not observed in the other populations. Viability and body size as measured by wing length were not altered by selection or cold shock, although there were consistent effects of source population on wing length. These results provide little evidence for temperature-specific adaptation in D. serrata-although the lines had diverged for some traits, these changes were not consistent with a priori predictions. In particular, there was no evidence for life-history changes reflecting adaptation to winter conditions at the southern border. The potential for D. serrata to adapt to winter conditions may therefore be limited.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 15133194     DOI: 10.1007/bf02715817

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Genet        ISSN: 0022-1333            Impact factor:   1.166


  38 in total

1.  Rapid loss of stress resistance in Drosophila melanogaster under adaptation to laboratory culture.

Authors:  A A Hoffmann; R Hallas; C Sinclair; L Partridge
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 3.694

2.  Laboratory adaptation of life history in Drosophila.

Authors:  C M Sgrò; L Partridge
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 3.926

3.  Effects of stress combinations on the expression of additive genetic variation for fecundity in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  C M Sgrò; A A Hoffmann
Journal:  Genet Res       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 1.588

Review 4.  Ecological population genetics: the interface between genes and the environment.

Authors:  A A Hoffmann; C M Sgrò; S H Lawler
Journal:  Annu Rev Genet       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 16.830

5.  THERMAL SENSITIVITY OF DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER RESPONDS RAPIDLY TO LABORATORY NATURAL SELECTION.

Authors:  Raymond B Huey; Linda Partridge; Kevin Fowler
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 3.694

6.  Laboratory selection experiments using Drosophila: what do they really tell us?

Authors: 
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 17.712

7.  The effect of different light regimes on adult life span in Drosophila melanogaster is partly mediated through reproductive output.

Authors:  V Sheeba; V K Sharma; K Shubha; M K Chandrashekaran; A Joshi
Journal:  J Biol Rhythms       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 3.182

8.  ACCLIMATION, CROSS-GENERATION EFFECTS, AND THE RESPONSE TO SELECTION FOR INCREASED COLD RESISTANCE IN DROSOPHILA.

Authors:  Marcus J O Watson; Ary A Hoffmann
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 3.694

9.  EVOLUTION AND DEVELOPMENT OF BODY SIZE AND CELL SIZE IN DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER IN RESPONSE TO TEMPERATURE.

Authors:  Linda Partridge; Brian Barrie; Kevin Fowler; Vernon French
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 3.694

10.  Physiological mechanisms of evolved desiccation resistance in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  A G Gibbs; A K Chippindale; M R Rose
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 3.312

View more
  5 in total

1.  Testing evolutionary hypotheses about species borders: patterns of genetic variation towards the southern borders of two rainforest Drosophila and a related habitat generalist.

Authors:  Belinda van Heerwaarden; Vanessa Kellermann; Michele Schiffer; Mark Blacket; Carla M Sgrò; Ary A Hoffmann
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-02-25       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Clinal patterns of desiccation and starvation resistance in ancestral and invading populations of Drosophila subobscura.

Authors:  George W Gilchrist; Lisa M Jeffers; Brianna West; Donna G Folk; Jeremy Suess; Raymond B Huey
Journal:  Evol Appl       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 5.183

3.  Responses of holocyclic and anholocyclic Rhopalosiphum padi populations to low-temperature and short-photoperiod induction.

Authors:  Xiong Peng; Xianfeng Qiao; Maohua Chen
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2017-01-19       Impact factor: 2.912

4.  Implications of existing local (mal)adaptations for ecological forecasting under environmental change.

Authors:  Richard J Walters; David Berger
Journal:  Evol Appl       Date:  2019-07-30       Impact factor: 5.183

5.  Investigating climate change and reproduction: experimental tools from evolutionary biology.

Authors:  Vera M Grazer; Oliver Y Martin
Journal:  Biology (Basel)       Date:  2012-09-13
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.