Literature DB >> 10649181

Electronic fetal heart rate monitoring: early neonatal outcomes associated with normal rate, fetal stress, and fetal distress.

E H Dellinger1, F H Boehm, M M Crane.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to test the ability of a clearly defined classification system for electronic fetal heart rate monitoring to predict early neonatal outcome. STUDY
DESIGN: All labors of women with singleton pregnancies > or = 32 weeks' gestation electronically monitored at 2 institutions were examined. Tracings in the final hour before delivery were defined as normal, fetal stress, or fetal distress. After delivery, Apgar scores, cord blood gas values, and admission to the neonatal intensive care unit were examined as measures of early neonatal outcome.
RESULTS: Among the 898 patients who qualified for study, 627 (70%) had tracings classified as normal, 263 (29%) had tracings classified as fetal stress, and 8 (1%) had tracings classified as fetal distress. There was a significant worsening of neonatal outcome across these 3 groups with regard to depressed Apgar scores 1 minute (5.1%, 18.3%, and 75.0%; P <.05), depressed Apgar scores at 5 minutes (1.0%, 3.8%, and 37.5%; P <.05), and admission to the neonatal intensive care unit (5.6%, 10.6%, and 37.5%; P <.05). There was also a progressive worsening of cord blood pH (7.27 +/- 0.06, 7.21 +/- 0.08, and 7.06 +/- 0.14; P <.05), a progressive increase in PCO (2) (53.39 +/- 8.34 mm Hg, 58.51 +/- 10.55 mm Hg, and 78.31 +/- 20.35 mm Hg; P <.05), and a progressive decline in base excess (-3.18 +/- 2.02 mEq/L, -5. 11 +/- 3.11 mEq/L, and -9.07 +/- 4.59 mEq/L; P <.05).
CONCLUSION: This simple classification system for interpreting fetal heart rate tracings accurately predicts normal outcomes for fetuses as well discriminating fetuses in true distress. Further, it identifies an intermediate group of fetuses with a condition labeled fetal stress who might benefit from additional evaluation and possibly from expeditious delivery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10649181     DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9378(00)70515-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  6 in total

1.  Cesarean section for suspected fetal distress, continuous fetal heart monitoring and decision to delivery time.

Authors:  K K Roy; Jinee Baruah; Sunesh Kumar; A K Deorari; J B Sharma; Debjyoti Karmakar
Journal:  Indian J Pediatr       Date:  2009-02-04       Impact factor: 1.967

2.  Multi-lag tone-entropy in neonatal stress.

Authors:  Matej Šapina; Chandan Kumar Karmakar; Karolina Kramarić; Matthieu Garcin; P David Adelson; Krešimir Milas; Marko Pirić; Dario Brdarić; John Yearwood
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2018-09-19       Impact factor: 4.118

Review 3.  Intrapartum Electronic Foetal Monitoring : Does it Lead or Mislead?

Authors:  Shakti Vardhan; T K Bhattacharyya; S K Kathpalia; Sps Kochar
Journal:  Med J Armed Forces India       Date:  2011-07-21

4.  Caesarean Section for Foetal Distress and Correlation with Perinatal Outcome.

Authors:  Richa Gangwar; Sarita Chaudhary
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol India       Date:  2016-01-28

5.  Evaluation of 3-tier and 5-tier FHR pattern classifications using umbilical blood pH and base excess at delivery.

Authors:  Hitomi Kikuchi; Shunichi Noda; Shinji Katsuragi; Tomoaki Ikeda; Hiroyuki Horio
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-02-06       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 6.  Fetal movements as a predictor of health.

Authors:  Jonathan Lai; Niamh C Nowlan; Ravi Vaidyanathan; Caroline J Shaw; Christoph C Lees
Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 3.636

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.