Literature DB >> 27651599

Caesarean Section for Foetal Distress and Correlation with Perinatal Outcome.

Richa Gangwar1, Sarita Chaudhary1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The main documented indication of intrapartum caesarean section is foetal distress (MacKenzie and Cooke in BMJ 323(7318):930, 2001). Foetal distress indicates foetal hypoxia and acidosis during intrauterine life.
PURPOSE: To correlate the diagnosis of foetal distress and perinatal outcome.
METHODS: This was a prospective observational study of women who underwent caesarean section for foetal distress as detected by cardiotocography and not responding to intrauterine resuscitation. The foetal Apgar score at 1 and 5 min was recorded and cord blood pH was measured in all cases. The neonatal outcome was studied with regard to the need for supportive ventilation and admission to NICU/nursery.
RESULTS: In our study, 14.38 % cases diagnosed with foetal distress subsequently had poor outcome. Twenty-one babies had a 5-min Apgar score <7, required immediate resuscitation and were admitted in NICU. Twelve foetuses had a 1-min Apgar score <4, while there were three cases of severe birth asphyxia (Apgar score <4 at 5 min); of these, two babies died. The neonatal outcome was poorer in cases with associated complicating factors.
CONCLUSION: The diagnosis of foetal distress is imprecise and a poor predictor of foetal outcome-the result is a tendency for unnecessary caesarean sections. On the contrary, lack of adverse outcome could reflect that our unit makes decisions at a time before clinically significant foetal compromise occurs.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Caesarean section; Cardiotocography; Foetal distress; Perinatal outcome

Year:  2016        PMID: 27651599      PMCID: PMC5016439          DOI: 10.1007/s13224-015-0831-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol India        ISSN: 0975-6434


  12 in total

1.  Bayesian interpretation of trials: the example of intrapartum electronic fetal heart rate monitoring.

Authors:  J Hornbuckle; A Vail; K R Abrams; J G Thornton
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 6.531

2.  Prospective 12 month study of 30 minute decision to delivery intervals for "emergency" caesarean section.

Authors:  I Z MacKenzie; I Cooke
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-06-02

Review 3.  Current status of intrapartum fetal monitoring: cardiotocography versus cardiotocography + ST analysis of the fetal ECG.

Authors:  Per Olofsson
Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol       Date:  2003-09-22       Impact factor: 2.435

4.  ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 106: Intrapartum fetal heart rate monitoring: nomenclature, interpretation, and general management principles.

Authors: 
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 7.661

5.  The potential impact of PR interval analysis of the fetal electrocardiogram (FECG) on intrapartum fetal monitoring.

Authors:  N N Reed; M P Mohajer; D S Sahota; D K James; E M Symonds
Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 2.435

6.  Electronic fetal heart rate monitoring: early neonatal outcomes associated with normal rate, fetal stress, and fetal distress.

Authors:  E H Dellinger; F H Boehm; M M Crane
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 8.661

Review 7.  Continuous electronic heart rate monitoring for fetal assessment during labor.

Authors:  S B Thacker; D Stroup; M Chang
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2001

8.  Interval between decision and delivery by caesarean section-are current standards achievable? Observational case series.

Authors:  D J Tuffnell; K Wilkinson; N Beresford
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-06-02

9.  Elimination of fetal scalp blood sampling on a large clinical service.

Authors:  T M Goodwin; L Milner-Masterson; R H Paul
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 7.661

Review 10.  Fetal electrocardiogram (ECG) for fetal monitoring during labour.

Authors:  J P Neilson
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2003
View more
  2 in total

1.  Disclosing suboptimal indications for emergency caesarean sections due to fetal distress and prolonged labor: a multicenter cross-sectional study at 12 public hospitals in Nepal.

Authors:  Helena Litorp; Rejina Gurung; Mats Målqvist; Ashish Kc
Journal:  Reprod Health       Date:  2020-12-17       Impact factor: 3.223

2.  Comparison of Postoperative Pulmonary Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Cesarean Section under General and Spinal Anesthesia: A Single-Center Audit.

Authors:  Andrew Louis; Manish Kumar Tiwary; Praveen Sharma; Abhijit Sukumaran Nair
Journal:  Anesth Essays Res       Date:  2022-03-30
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.