Literature DB >> 10647634

A new grading of rectal internal mucosal prolapse and its correlation with diagnosis and treatment.

M Pescatori1, C Quondamcarlo.   

Abstract

The management of rectal internal mucosal prolapse (RIMP) is not based on an accepted classification of the lesion which helps to choose the appropriate treatment. The aim of this prospective study was to report a new endoscopic grading of RIMP and to evaluate its clinical value. Thirty-two patients (7 men, 25 women; mean age 56 years, range 28-72) affected by symptomatic RIMP were prospectively classified as follows: RIMP was defined as first degree when detectable below the anorectal ring on straining, as second degree when it reached the dentate line, and as third degree when it reached the anal verge. Anal manometry was carried out in 26 patients, and anal ultrasound and defecography in 6 prior to surgery. A correlation was found between the occurrence and severity of symptoms and the degree of the prolapse as obstructed defecation, bleeding and fecal soiling affected mainly patients with third-degree RIMP. At manometry the maximal resting tone was 60+/-23 mm Hg and voluntary contraction 96+/-41 mm Hg (mean+/-SEM). At anal ultrasound the mean internal sphincter thickness was 2.1+/-0.2 mm, and external sphincter thickness was 7.0+/-0.8 mm. A significant rectocele and rectal intussusception (n = 2) and a nonrelaxing puborectalis muscle on straining (n = 2) were observed at defecography in cases with third-degree RIMP. The anorectal angle was 100+/-75 degrees at rest, 63+/-20 degrees on squeezing, and 115+/-9 degrees on straining. A conservative treatment with high-fiber diet and/or rubber band ligation was carried out in all cases of first and in most patients with second-degree RIMP (n = 26). Those who required surgery, i.e., stapled transanal excision of the prolapse (n = 6), had either severely symptomatic third-degree RIMP with solitary ulcer syndrome (n = 4) or second-degree RIMP (n = 2). A positive outcome was achieved in 71% of cases. The proposed classification evaluated by the present study may be of clinical value in managing rectal internal mucosal prolapse.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10647634     DOI: 10.1007/s003840050218

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis        ISSN: 0179-1958            Impact factor:   2.571


  14 in total

1.  Disappointing long-term outcomes after stapled transanal rectal resection for obstructed defecation.

Authors:  Khaled M Madbouly; Khaled S Abbas; Ahmed M Hussein
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Transperineal ultrasound in the assessment of haemorrhoids and haemorrhoidectomy: a pilot study.

Authors:  A P Zbar; R Murison
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 3.781

Review 3.  Management of obstructed defecation.

Authors:  Vlasta Podzemny; Lorenzo Carlo Pescatori; Mario Pescatori
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-01-28       Impact factor: 5.742

4.  Partial prolapsectomy and fixation proctomucopexy: a novel minimally invasive procedure.

Authors:  L C Pescatori; G Busuito; M Pescatori
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2014-05-08       Impact factor: 3.781

5.  Stapled transanal rectal resection versus stapled anopexy in the cure of hemorrhoids associated with rectal prolapse. A randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Paolo Boccasanta; Marco Venturi; Giancarlo Roviaro
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2006-10-05       Impact factor: 2.571

6.  Nonsurgical Therapy for Solitary Rectal Ulcer Syndrome.

Authors:  Phyllis R. Bishop; Michael J. Nowicki
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol       Date:  2002-06

7.  A modified Delorme's operation for the treatment of rectal mucosal prolapse.

Authors:  Yonggang Wang; Chunbao Zhai; Liyun Niu; Lijun Tian; Jianyong Yang; Zheng Hu
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2009-12-18       Impact factor: 2.571

8.  Rectal mucosal prolapse in males: surgery is effective for fecal incontinence but not for obstructed defecation.

Authors:  O Schwandner; B Schrinner
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2014-05-01       Impact factor: 3.781

9.  Rectocele and intussusception: is there any coherence in symptoms or additional pelvic floor disorders?

Authors:  R Hausammann; T Steffen; D Weishaupt; U Beutner; F H Hetzer
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2009-03-14       Impact factor: 3.781

10.  Semi-closed bilateral partial miotomy of the puborectalis for anismus: a pilot study: Partial miotomy of the puborectalis for anismus.

Authors:  L Asciore; L C Pescatori; M Pescatori
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2015-08-09       Impact factor: 2.571

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.