Literature DB >> 26255256

Semi-closed bilateral partial miotomy of the puborectalis for anismus: a pilot study: Partial miotomy of the puborectalis for anismus.

L Asciore1, L C Pescatori1, M Pescatori2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Anismus or non relaxing puborectalis muscle (PRM) may cause obstructed defecation (OD). Reported surgical treatment is partial miotomy, followed by sepsis, bleeding, and incontinence. The aim of the present study was to investigate on the feasibility and outcome of a modified mini-invasive operation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Consecutive patients with anismus and OD not responding to medical therapy, excluding multiparous females, patients with anal incontinence, recto-rectal intussusception, and disordered psychological pattern. Semi-closed bilateral partial division of PRM, pulled down through 1-cm perianal incisions, was performed. Concomitant significant rectal mucosal prolapse and rectocele, when present, were treated. OD was evaluated using a validated score and anal/vaginal ultrasound (US) was performed pre -and postoperatively. A control group of seven patients with normal bowel habit was also investigated.
RESULTS: Eight patients (seven females), median age 48 years (range 29-71) were operated. Six also had significant mucosal prolapse and rectocele. All were followed up for a median of 12 months (range 2-40). None of them had postoperative sepsis or bleeding. One had just one occasional episode of mild anal incontinence. Symptoms improved in 6 or 75 % and, OD score decreased from 19.6 ± 1.0 to 9.2 ± 2.0 (mean ± s.e.m.), P = 0.007. No patient had anismus after surgery and PRM relaxation changed from 0 to 5.9 ± 0.8 mm being 6.6 ± 1.5 mm in controls.
CONCLUSION: Semi-closed bilateral partial division of PRM achieves muscle's relaxation on straining in all patients without any significant postoperative complication. Further studies are needed prior to consider it a validated procedure.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anismus; Constipation; Obstructed defecation; Puborectalis muscle

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26255256     DOI: 10.1007/s00384-015-2330-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis        ISSN: 0179-1958            Impact factor:   2.571


  25 in total

1.  Long-term outcomes of transanal rectocele repair.

Authors:  Horace Roman; Francis Michot
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 4.585

2.  Transrectal repair of rectocele using obliterative suture.

Authors:  I R Block
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1986-11       Impact factor: 4.585

3.  Anterolateral rectopexy for correction of rectoceles leads to good anatomical but poor functional results.

Authors:  J Vermeulen; J F Lange; A C Sikkenk; E van der Harst
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 3.781

4.  Experience of posterior division of the puborectalis muscle in the management of chronic constipation.

Authors:  P R Barnes; P R Hawley; D M Preston; J E Lennard-Jones
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1985-06       Impact factor: 6.939

5.  Results, outcome predictors, and complications after stapled transanal rectal resection for obstructed defecation.

Authors:  Giuseppe Gagliardi; Mario Pescatori; Donato F Altomare; Gian Andrea Binda; Corrado Bottini; Giuseppe Dodi; Vincenzino Filingeri; Giovanni Milito; Marcella Rinaldi; Giovanni Romano; Liana Spazzafumo; Mario Trompetto
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2007-12-22       Impact factor: 4.585

6.  Surgery for occult rectal prolapse.

Authors:  A J Brown; J H Anderson; R F McKee; I G Finlay
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 3.788

7.  Long-term follow-up of simultaneous abdominoperineal repair of enterorectocele and internal mucosal prolapse.

Authors:  Mario Pescatori
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 4.585

8.  Comparative study between botulinum toxin injection and partial division of puborectalis for treating anismus.

Authors:  Mohamed Farid; Tamer Youssef; Tarek Mahdy; Waleed Omar; Hesham Abdul Moneim; Ayman El Nakeeb; Mohamed Youssef
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2008-11-29       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 9.  Botulinum neurotoxin and other treatments for fissure-in-ano and pelvic floor disorders.

Authors:  G Maria; G Sganga; I M Civello; G Brisinda
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 6.939

10.  STARR with Contour Transtar: prospective multicentre European study.

Authors:  L Lenisa; O Schwandner; A Stuto; D Jayne; F Pigot; J J Tuech; R Scherer; K Nugent; F Corbisier; E Espin-Basany; F H Hetzer
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2008-10-17       Impact factor: 3.788

View more
  4 in total

1.  Endoanal/endovaginal ultrasound-assisted bilateral partial myotomy of the puborectalis for anismus.

Authors:  M Pescatori; G Gallo
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2016-01-18       Impact factor: 3.781

2.  Efficacy and safety of botulinum toxin in treatment of anismus: A systematic review.

Authors:  Sameh Hany Emile; Hossam Ayman Elfeki; Hosam Ghazy Elbanna; Mohamed Youssef; Waleed Thabet; Tito M Abd El-Hamed; Basem Said; Ahmed Lotfy
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2016-08-06

3.  Megabowel with anismus.

Authors:  F Cobellis; E Satta; M Pescatori
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2019-11-29       Impact factor: 3.781

4.  An investigation into the effect of biofeedback on urinary and fecal incontinence in patients with anal sphincter dysfunction.

Authors:  Mohammad Islami Vaghar
Journal:  J Family Med Prim Care       Date:  2019-07
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.