Literature DB >> 24788201

Rectal mucosal prolapse in males: surgery is effective for fecal incontinence but not for obstructed defecation.

O Schwandner1, B Schrinner.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The aim of this prospective study was to evaluate the functional outcome of transanal surgery in male patients suffering from fecal incontinence, soiling, and obstructed defecation associated with rectal mucosal prolapse.
METHODS: All male patients who underwent transanal surgery (either stapled or Delorme mucosectomy) for rectal mucosal prolapse associated with fecal incontinence and obstructed defecation were prospectively enrolled in the study. The recruitment phase was 17 months (April 2011 to August 2012). Symptom evaluation was based on the validated scores preoperatively and 12 months after surgery (Wexner incontinence score and Wexner constipation score). The primary end point was "success," which was defined as a 50 % reduction in symptoms. Using a decision-tree algorithm, patient groups with the highest and lowest chance of success were identified.
RESULTS: Thirty-eight male patients (mean age 51 years) underwent transanal surgery for rectal mucosal prolapse. The predominant symptoms were fecal incontinence in 31 patients (82 %) and obstructed defecation in 7 (18 %). Stapled mucosectomy was performed in 34 patients and Delorme mucosectomy in 4 patients. No major morbidity occurred. Symptom resolution for soiling was 77 %, itching and mucus secretion were improved in 47 and 50 %, and bleeding resolved in 89 % of patients affected. Functional outcome was good in 90 % (28/31) of the patients with fecal incontinence but in only 28 % (2/7) for obstructed defecation. The Wexner incontinence score decreased significantly (11.1 vs. 3.9, p < 0.01), whereas the Wexner constipation score was not influenced (18.4 vs. 15.6, p > 0.05). Using a decision-tree algorithm, a success rate of 96 % was observed in patients with fecal incontinence associated with younger age (age <45 years) and no presence of fecal urgency prior to surgery.
CONCLUSIONS: Transanal stapled mucosectomy for rectal mucosal prolapse in males is effective for fecal incontinence, but not for obstructed defecation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24788201     DOI: 10.1007/s10151-014-1158-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tech Coloproctol        ISSN: 1123-6337            Impact factor:   3.781


  24 in total

Review 1.  [Significance of conservative treatment for faecal incontinence].

Authors:  O Schwandner
Journal:  Zentralbl Chir       Date:  2012-08-29       Impact factor: 0.942

2.  Circular stapling procedure for mucosal prolapse of the rectum associated with outlet obstruction.

Authors:  Y Araki; N Ishibashi; Y Kishimoto; K Matono; M Nakagawa; Y Nozoe; T Sasatomi; Y Ogata; K Shirouzu
Journal:  Kurume Med J       Date:  2001

Review 3.  Etiology and management of fecal incontinence.

Authors:  J M Jorge; S D Wexner
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 4.585

4.  Longitudinal multiple rubber band ligation: an alternative method to treat mucosal prolapse of the anterior rectal wall.

Authors:  Harry Kleinübing; Mauro S L Pinho; Luis C Ferreira
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 4.585

5.  Prospective study of the diagnostic evaluation of faecal incontinence and leakage in male patients.

Authors:  M Titi; J T Jenkins; A Urie; R G Molloy
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 3.788

6.  A constipation scoring system to simplify evaluation and management of constipated patients.

Authors:  F Agachan; T Chen; J Pfeifer; P Reissman; S D Wexner
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 4.585

7.  Clinical and functional evaluation of patients with rectocele and mucosal prolapse treated with transanal repair of rectocele and rectal mucosectomy with a single circular stapler (TRREMS).

Authors:  V M Leal; F S P Regadas; S M M Regadas; L R Veras
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2010-10-19       Impact factor: 3.781

8.  Tailored surgery for internal and external rectal prolapse: functional results of 268 patients operated upon by a single surgeon over a 21-year period*.

Authors:  M Pescatori; A P Zbar
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2008-07-15       Impact factor: 3.788

9.  [Our experience in the treatment of hemorrhoids and circumferential mucosal rectal prolapse using Longo muco-prolapsectomy ].

Authors:  Giuseppe Trentin; Ferdinando Agresta; Pietro Mainente; Luigi Ciardo; Ivan Michelet; Natalino Bedin
Journal:  Chir Ital       Date:  2002 May-Jun

10.  Conservative treatment of patients with faecal soiling.

Authors:  S J van der Hagen; P B Soeters; C G Baeten; W G van Gemert
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2011-07-01       Impact factor: 3.781

View more
  3 in total

1.  Farm and animal-level risk factors associated with rectal prolapse in bovine and buffalo calves in Egypt with special reference to the optimal treatment strategy.

Authors:  Alaa Samy; Eman Abo Elfadl; Naglaa Gomaa; Mohamed A Hamed; Abdelnaser Ahmed Abdallah; Mohamed Abdo Rizk
Journal:  Open Vet J       Date:  2022-04-02

2.  Tools for fecal incontinence assessment: lessons for inflammatory bowel disease trials based on a systematic review.

Authors:  Ferdinando D'Amico; Steven D Wexner; Carolynne J Vaizey; Célia Gouynou; Silvio Danese; Laurent Peyrin-Biroulet
Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J       Date:  2020-07-17       Impact factor: 4.623

Review 3.  Fecal Incontinence: The Importance of a Structured Pathophysiological Model.

Authors:  Marloes E Knol; Heleen S Snijders; Johannes Tm van der Heyden; Coen Im Baeten
Journal:  J Anus Rectum Colon       Date:  2022-01-28
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.