Literature DB >> 10645952

Selection against frameshift mutations limits microsatellite expansion in coding DNA.

D Metzgar1, J Bytof, C Wills.   

Abstract

Microsatellite enrichment is an excess of repetitive sequences characteristic to all studied eukaryotes. It is thought to result from the accumulated effects of replication slippage mutations. Enrichment is commonly measured as the ratio of the observed frequency of microsatellites to the frequency expected to result from random association of nucleotides. We have compared enrichment of specific types of microsatellites in coding sequences with those in noncoding sequences across seven eukaryotic clades. The results reveal consistent differences between coding and noncoding regions, in terms of both the quantity of repetitive DNA and the types present. In noncoding regions, all types of microsatellite (mono-, di-, tri-, tetra-, penta-, and hexanucleotide repeats) are found in excess, and in all cases, these excesses scale in a similar exponential fashion with the length of the microsatellite. This suggests that all types of noncoding repeats are subject to similar mutational and selective processes. Coding repeats, however, appear to be under much stronger and more specific constraints. Tri- and hexanucleotide repeats are found in consistent and significant excess over a wide range of lengths in both coding and noncoding sequences, but other repeat types are much less frequent in coding regions than in noncoding regions. These findings suggest that the differences between coding and noncoding microsatellite frequencies arise from specific selection against frameshift mutations in coding regions resulting from length changes in nontriplet repeats. Furthermore, the excesses of tri- and hexanucleotide coding repeats appear to be controlled primarily by mutation pressure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10645952      PMCID: PMC310501     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genome Res        ISSN: 1088-9051            Impact factor:   9.043


  15 in total

Review 1.  Simple sequences and the expanding genome.

Authors:  J M Hancock
Journal:  Bioessays       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 4.345

2.  Instability of simple sequence DNA in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  S T Henderson; T D Petes
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 4.272

Review 3.  Triplet repeat mutations in human disease.

Authors:  C T Caskey; A Pizzuti; Y H Fu; R G Fenwick; D L Nelson
Journal:  Science       Date:  1992-05-08       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Evolution of microsatellites in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae: role of length and number of repeated units.

Authors:  T Pupko; D Graur
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 2.395

5.  A measure of population subdivision based on microsatellite allele frequencies.

Authors:  M Slatkin
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 6.  Simple sequences.

Authors:  D Tautz
Journal:  Curr Opin Genet Dev       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 5.578

7.  The number of repeats expected in random nucleic acid sequences and found in genes.

Authors:  R de Wachter
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  1981-07-07       Impact factor: 2.691

Review 8.  Slipped-strand mispairing: a major mechanism for DNA sequence evolution.

Authors:  G Levinson; G A Gutman
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  1987-05       Impact factor: 16.240

9.  The contribution of slippage-like processes to genome evolution.

Authors:  J M Hancock
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 2.395

10.  SIMPLE34: an improved and enhanced implementation for VAX and Sun computers of the SIMPLE algorithm for analysis of clustered repetitive motifs in nucleotide sequences.

Authors:  J M Hancock; J S Armstrong
Journal:  Comput Appl Biosci       Date:  1994-02
View more
  168 in total

1.  Domain-level differences in microsatellite distribution and content result from different relative rates of insertion and deletion mutations.

Authors:  David Metzgar; Li Liu; Christian Hansen; Kevin Dybvig; Christopher Wills
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 9.043

2.  Developing new SSR markers from ESTs of pea (Pisum sativum L.).

Authors:  Ya-ming Gong; Sheng-chun Xu; Wei-hua Mao; Qi-zan Hu; Gu-wen Zhang; Ju Ding; Ya-dan Li
Journal:  J Zhejiang Univ Sci B       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 3.066

3.  Variable numbers of tandem repeats in Plasmodium falciparum genes.

Authors:  John C Tan; Asako Tan; Lisa Checkley; Caroline M Honsa; Michael T Ferdig
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2010-08-22       Impact factor: 2.395

4.  Simple-sequence repeat markers used in merging linkage maps of melon (Cucumis melo L.).

Authors:  M J Gonzalo; M Oliver; J Garcia-Mas; A Monfort; R Dolcet-Sanjuan; N Katzir; P Arús; A J Monforte
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2005-02-08       Impact factor: 5.699

5.  The landscape of microsatellite instability in colorectal and endometrial cancer genomes.

Authors:  Tae-Min Kim; Peter W Laird; Peter J Park
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2013-11-07       Impact factor: 41.582

6.  Rampant gene exchange across a strong reproductive barrier between the annual sunflowers, Helianthus annuus and H. petiolaris.

Authors:  Yoko Yatabe; Nolan C Kane; Caroline Scotti-Saintagne; Loren H Rieseberg
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2007-02-04       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 7.  Mutational dynamics of microsatellites.

Authors:  Atul Bhargava; F F Fuentes
Journal:  Mol Biotechnol       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 2.695

8.  Highly polymorphic microsatellite for identification of Candida albicans strains.

Authors:  Paula Sampaio; Leonor Gusmão; Cíntia Alves; Cidália Pina-Vaz; António Amorim; Célia Pais
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 5.948

9.  Ontology and diversity of transcript-associated microsatellites mined from a globe artichoke EST database.

Authors:  Davide Scaglione; Alberto Acquadro; Ezio Portis; Christopher A Taylor; Sergio Lanteri; Steven J Knapp
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2009-09-28       Impact factor: 3.969

10.  Cross-species transferability and mapping of genomic and cDNA SSRs in pines.

Authors:  D Chagné; P Chaumeil; A Ramboer; C Collada; A Guevara; M T Cervera; G G Vendramin; V Garcia; J-M Frigerio; C Echt; T Richardson; C Plomion
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2004-09-22       Impact factor: 5.699

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.