Literature DB >> 23177520

Improving patient safety through the systematic evaluation of patient outcomes.

Alan J Forster1, Geoff Dervin, Claude Martin, Steven Papp.   

Abstract

Despite increased advocacy for patient safety and several large-scale programs designed to reduce preventable harm, most notably surgical checklists, recent data evaluating entire health systems suggests that we are no further ahead in improving patient safety and that hospital complications are no less frequent now than in the 1990s. We suggest that the failure to systematically measure patient safety is the reason for our limited pro gress. In addition to defining patient safety outcomes and describing their financial and clinical impact, we argue why the failure to implement patient safety measurement systems has compromised the ability to move the agenda forward. We also present an overview of how patient safety can be assessed and the strengths and weaknesses of each method and comment on some of the consequences created by the absence of a systematic measurement system.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23177520      PMCID: PMC3506692          DOI: 10.1503/cjs.007811

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can J Surg        ISSN: 0008-428X            Impact factor:   2.089


  52 in total

1.  Medical error: the second victim. The doctor who makes the mistake needs help too.

Authors:  A W Wu
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-03-18

2.  The Institute of Medicine report on medical errors--could it do harm?

Authors:  T A Brennan
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2000-04-13       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Adverse events in British hospitals: preliminary retrospective record review.

Authors:  C Vincent; G Neale; M Woloshynowych
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-03-03

4.  Does clinical evidence support ICD-9-CM diagnosis coding of complications?

Authors:  E P McCarthy; L I Iezzoni; R B Davis; R H Palmer; M Cahalane; M B Hamel; K Mukamal; R S Phillips; D T Davies
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 2.983

5.  Using the Veterans Administration National Surgical Quality Improvement Program to improve patient outcomes.

Authors:  L Neumayer; M Mastin; L Vanderhoof; D Hinson
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 2.192

6.  A computerized method for identifying incidents associated with adverse drug events in outpatients.

Authors:  B Honigman; P Light; R M Pulling; D W Bates
Journal:  Int J Med Inform       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 4.046

7.  Incidence and types of adverse events and negligent care in Utah and Colorado.

Authors:  E J Thomas; D M Studdert; H R Burstin; E J Orav; T Zeena; E J Williams; K M Howard; P C Weiler; T A Brennan
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 2.983

8.  Detecting and reducing hospital adverse events: outcomes of the Wimmera clinical risk management program.

Authors:  A M Wolff; J Bourke; I A Campbell; D W Leembruggen
Journal:  Med J Aust       Date:  2001-06-18       Impact factor: 7.738

9.  Use of administrative data to find substandard care: validation of the complications screening program.

Authors:  S N Weingart; L I Iezzoni; R B Davis; R H Palmer; M Cahalane; M B Hamel; K Mukamal; R S Phillips; D T Davies; N J Banks
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 2.983

10.  Temporal trends in rates of patient harm resulting from medical care.

Authors:  Christopher P Landrigan; Gareth J Parry; Catherine B Bones; Andrew D Hackbarth; Donald A Goldmann; Paul J Sharek
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2010-11-25       Impact factor: 91.245

View more
  1 in total

1.  Handoffs, safety culture, and practices: evidence from the hospital survey on patient safety culture.

Authors:  Soo-Hoon Lee; Phillip H Phan; Todd Dorman; Sallie J Weaver; Peter J Pronovost
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2016-07-12       Impact factor: 2.655

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.