Literature DB >> 10642727

Clinical application of BASING and spectral/spatial water and lipid suppression pulses for prostate cancer staging and localization by in vivo 3D 1H magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging.

R G Males1, D B Vigneron, J Star-Lack, S C Falbo, S J Nelson, H Hricak, J Kurhanewicz.   

Abstract

In previous in situ point-resolved spectroscopy (PRESS) three-dimensional (3D) 1H magnetic resonance (MR) spectroscopic imaging studies, it has been demonstrated that the ratio of prostatic metabolites can noninvasively discriminate prostate cancer from surrounding normal tissue. However, in these studies, conventional chemical shift selective suppression (CHESS) and short-time inversion recovery (STIR) techniques often resulted in inadequate water and lipid suppression. To improve suppression and spatial coverage, the newly developed T1 insensitive dual band selective inversion with gradient dephasing (BASING) Bandstop Filter and dual phase-compensating spectral/spatial spin-echo pulses have been implemented in a clinical setting. In phantom studies, no change in metabolic profiles was observed with application of either BASING or spectral/spatial pulses. In a study of 17 prostate cancer patients, the use of either BASING or spectral/spatial pulses allowed for suppression of water (BASING 99.80 +/- 0.14% and spectral/spatial 99.73 +/- 0.47%) and lipid (BASING 98.56 +/- 1.03% and spectral/spatial 98.44 +/- 1.90%) without a significant difference in the prostatic metabolite ratios. Spectral/spatial suppression has the added advantage of reducing the chemical shift dependence of the PRESS volume, but optimal performance requires high-speed gradients with negligible eddy current effects. BASING suppression is less reliant on accurate pulse and gradient timings and can be implemented easily with no loss in performance on clinical MR scanners with conventional gradients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10642727     DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1522-2594(200001)43:1<17::aid-mrm3>3.0.co;2-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Magn Reson Med        ISSN: 0740-3194            Impact factor:   4.668


  21 in total

Review 1.  Three-dimensional magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging of brain and prostate cancer.

Authors:  J Kurhanewicz; D B Vigneron; S J Nelson
Journal:  Neoplasia       Date:  2000 Jan-Apr       Impact factor: 5.715

Review 2.  Diffusion-weighted imaging with apparent diffusion coefficient mapping and spectroscopy in prostate cancer.

Authors:  Michael A Jacobs; Ronald Ouwerkerk; Kyle Petrowski; Katarzyna J Macura
Journal:  Top Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2008-12

3.  Mucinous adenocarcinoma of the prostate: MRI and MR spectroscopy features.

Authors:  Antonio C Westphalen; Fergus V Coakley; John Kurhanewicz; Galen Reed; Zhen J Wang; Jeffry P Simko
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 3.959

4.  Clinical stage T1c prostate cancer: evaluation with endorectal MR imaging and MR spectroscopic imaging.

Authors:  Jingbo Zhang; Hedvig Hricak; Amita Shukla-Dave; Oguz Akin; Nicole M Ishill; Lauren J Carlino; Victor E Reuter; James A Eastham
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  Abnormal findings on multiparametric prostate magnetic resonance imaging predict subsequent biopsy upgrade in patients with low risk prostate cancer managed with active surveillance.

Authors:  Robert R Flavell; Antonio C Westphalen; Carmin Liang; Christopher C Sotto; Susan M Noworolski; Daniel B Vigneron; Zhen J Wang; John Kurhanewicz
Journal:  Abdom Imaging       Date:  2014-10

Review 6.  MR imaging of the prostate in clinical practice.

Authors:  Yousef Mazaheri; Amita Shukla-Dave; Ada Muellner; Hedvig Hricak
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2008-09-16       Impact factor: 2.310

Review 7.  Value of magnetic resonance imaging in prostate cancer diagnosis.

Authors:  Friedrich Aigner; Leo Pallwein; Alexandre Pelzer; Georg Schaefer; Georg Bartsch; Dieter zur Nedden; Ferdinand Frauscher
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2007-06-14       Impact factor: 4.226

8.  Prostate cancer: is inapparent tumor at endorectal MR and MR spectroscopic imaging a favorable prognostic finding in patients who select active surveillance?

Authors:  Alvin R Cabrera; Fergus V Coakley; Antonio C Westphalen; Ying Lu; Shoujun Zhao; Katsuto Shinohara; Peter R Carroll; John Kurhanewicz
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  Prediction of prostate cancer recurrence using magnetic resonance imaging and molecular profiles.

Authors:  Amita Shukla-Dave; Hedvig Hricak; Nicole Ishill; Chaya S Moskowitz; Marija Drobnjak; Victor E Reuter; Kristen L Zakian; Peter T Scardino; Carlos Cordon-Cardo
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2009-05-12       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 10.  Multidisciplinary functional MR imaging for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Jeong Kon Kim; Yun-Jin Jang; Gyunggoo Cho
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2009 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.500

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.