Literature DB >> 10641314

Comparing effects of the horizontal-vertical illusion on grip scaling and judgment: relative versus absolute, not perception versus action.

P M Vishton1, J G Rea, J E Cutting, L N Nuñez.   

Abstract

The discovery that the prehension component of an open-loop, two-fingered reach is largely immune to certain salient pictorial illusions has been used to suggest that humans possess 2 distinct visual systems, 1 that subserves perceptual judgment and 1 that mediates visually controlled action. In this article, the authors present evidence that suggests that the critical distinction is not that of reaching and judgment but of relative and absolute perception. Experiment 1 extends the findings of S. Aglioti, J. F. X. DeSouza, and M. A. Goodale (1995) and suggests that the manual prehension component of open-loop reaching is affected by the horizontal-vertical illusion to a much smaller degree than perceptual size judgments. In Experiments 2 and 3, however, when perceptual size judgment is directed at a single element of the display, this difference vanishes. Experiment 4 demonstrates that grip scaling is strongly affected by the illusion when a single reach is scaled to both the horizontal and vertical components of a triangular figure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10641314     DOI: 10.1037//0096-1523.25.6.1659

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  25 in total

1.  Dissociating perception and action in Kanizsa's compression illusion.

Authors:  Nicola Bruno; Paolo Bernardis
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2002-12

2.  Dissociation between location and shape in visual space.

Authors:  Jack M Loomis; John W Philbeck; Pavel Zahorik
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 3.332

3.  A step and a hop on the Müller-Lyer: illusion effects on lower-limb movements.

Authors:  Scott Glover; Peter Dixon
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-10-25       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  When does action resist visual illusions? Effector position modulates illusory influences on motor responses.

Authors:  Nicola Bruno; Paolo Bernardis
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-05-29       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Manual size estimation: a neuropsychological measure of perception?

Authors:  V H Franz
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-07-08       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  The attentional repulsion effect in perception and action.

Authors:  Jay Pratt; Nicholas B Turk-Browne
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-08-19       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Grasping a 2D object: terminal haptic feedback supports an absolute visuo-haptic calibration.

Authors:  Stephanie Hosang; Jillian Chan; Shirin Davarpanah Jazi; Matthew Heath
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-12-17       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Manual-aiming bias and the Müller-Lyer illusion: the roles of position and extent information.

Authors:  John Predebon
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-01-15       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  How does action resist visual illusion? Uncorrected oculomotor information does not account for accurate pointing in peripersonal space.

Authors:  Paolo Bernardis; Paul Knox; Nicola Bruno
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-12-10       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Grasping the Müller-Lyer illusion: not a change in perceived length.

Authors:  Marianne Biegstraaten; Denise D J de Grave; Eli Brenner; Jeroen B J Smeets
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-12-05       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.