Literature DB >> 10641304

On the displacement of leisure items by food during multiple-stimulus preference assessments.

S L Bojak1, J E Carr.   

Abstract

Previous studies have demonstrated that when food and leisure stimuli are combined in multiple-stimulus preference assessments, individuals typically select food more often, although the leisure stimuli also have known reinforcing properties. The purpose of the current study was to replicate this effect and determine its durability by examining the effect after mealtimes. Four adults who had been diagnosed with severe mental retardation were given three initial multiple-stimulus (without replacement) preference assessments (i.e., food, leisure stimuli, and combined). All participants selected food items as the most preferred stimuli in the combined assessments. Combined assessments were then administered immediately before and after the evening meal for each participant for 1 week. The results showed similar data both before and after mealtimes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10641304      PMCID: PMC1284212          DOI: 10.1901/jaba.1999.32-515

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal        ISSN: 0021-8855


  5 in total

1.  Integrating caregiver report with systematic choice assessment to enhance reinforcer identification.

Authors:  W W Fisher; C C Piazza; L G Bowman; A Amari
Journal:  Am J Ment Retard       Date:  1996-07

2.  Evaluation of a multiple-stimulus presentation format for assessing reinforcer preferences.

Authors:  I G DeLeon; B A Iwata
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1996

3.  Displacement of leisure reinforcers by food during preference assessments.

Authors:  I G DeLeon; B A Iwata; E M Roscoe
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1997

4.  Preference testing: a comparison of two presentation methods.

Authors:  J Windsor; L M Piché; P A Locke
Journal:  Res Dev Disabil       Date:  1994 Nov-Dec

5.  Establishing operations and reinforcement effects.

Authors:  T R Vollmer; B A Iwata
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1991
  5 in total
  7 in total

1.  On the relation between reinforcer efficacy and preference.

Authors:  May S H Lee; C T Yu; Toby L Martin; Garry L Martin
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2010-03

2.  Preference for reinforcers under progressive- and fixed-ratio schedules: a comparison of single and concurrent arrangements.

Authors:  Ashley C Glover; Henry S Roane; Heather J Kadey; Laura L Grow
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2008

3.  Predicting the relative efficacy of three presentation methods for assessing preferences of persons with developmental disabilities.

Authors:  Carole Conyers; Adrienne Doole; Tricia Vause; Shayla Harapiak; Dickie C T Yu; Garry L Martin
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2002

Review 4.  Stimulus Preference Assessment Decision-Making System (SPADS): A Decision-Making Model for Practitioners.

Authors:  Jordan D Lill; Mark D Shriver; Keith D Allen
Journal:  Behav Anal Pract       Date:  2021-04-30

5.  Analysis of unexpected disruptive effects of contingent food reinforcement on automatically maintained self-injury.

Authors:  Griffin W Rooker; Louis P Hagopian; Jennifer N Haddock; Alexander R Arevalo; Andrew C Bonner; Christopher M Dillon
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2021-08-27

6.  Assessment of preference for edible and leisure items in individuals with dementia.

Authors:  Javier Virués Ortega; Brian A Iwata; Celia Nogales-González; Belén Frades
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2012

Review 7.  Priorities and Preferences of People Living with Dementia or Cognitive Impairment - A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Hannah Wehrmann; Bernhard Michalowsky; Simon Lepper; Wiebke Mohr; Anika Raedke; Wolfgang Hoffmann
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2021-12-14       Impact factor: 2.711

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.