Literature DB >> 14726317

Ethics review roulette: what can we learn?

Paul Glasziou, Iain Chalmers.   

Abstract

Keywords:  Biomedical and Behavioral Research

Mesh：

Year:  2004        PMID： 14726317      PMCID： PMC314496          DOI： 10.1136/bmj.328.7432.121

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ        ISSN： 0959-8138


× No keyword cloud information.
  9 in total

1.  The new system of review by multicentre research ethics committees: prospective study.

Authors:  J Tully; N Ninis; R Booy; R Viner
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-04-29

2.  Ethical review of a multicentre study in Scotland: a weighty problem.

Authors:  R al-Shahi; C P Warlow
Journal:  J R Coll Physicians Lond       Date:  1999 Nov-Dec

Review 3.  What are the effects of the fifth revision of the Declaration of Helsinki?

Authors:  S M Tollman; H Bastian; R Doll; L J Hirsch; H A Guess
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-12-15

4.  Investigating allegations of research misconduct: the vital need for due process.

Authors:  E Hey; I Chalmers
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-09-23

5.  Variations in experience in obtaining local ethical approval for participation in a multi-centre study.

Authors:  N A Maskell; E L Jones; R J O Davies
Journal:  QJM       Date:  2003-04

6.  Recruitment failure in early neonatal research.

Authors:  S Nicklin; S A Spencer
Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 5.747

7.  Local research ethics committees. BMA's advice about approval of clinical audit studies is confusing.

Authors:  P V Scott; C A Pinnock
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1997-07-05

8.  Ethics of n-of-1 trials.

Authors:  L Irwig; P Glasziou; L March
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1995-02-25       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  Ethical approval for research involving geographically dispersed subjects: unsuitability of the UK MREC/LREC system and relevance to uncommon genetic disorders.

Authors:  J C Lewis; S Tomkins; J R Sampson
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 2.903
  9 in total
  21 in total

1.  The other face of research governance.

Authors:  Alysun M Jones; Bryony Bamford
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2004-07-31

2.  Ethics review in research: ethics committees are risk averse.

Authors:  Helen J Minnis
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2004-03-20

3.  Ethics review in research: time has come for reassessment.

Authors:  Martin McKee
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2004-03-20

4.  Ethics review in research: research governance also delays research.

Authors:  David J Torgerson; Jo C Dumville
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2004-03-20

5.  Ethics review in research: role of ethics committee review is interpreted widely.

Authors:  Ian L P Beales
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2004-03-20

6.  Toward stronger evidence on quality improvement. Draft publication guidelines: the beginning of a consensus project.

Authors:  F Davidoff; P Batalden
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2005-10

7.  The reform of UK research ethics committees: throwing the baby out with the bath water?

Authors:  S Kerrison; A M Pollock
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 2.903

Review 8.  Non-commercial clinical trials of a medicinal product: can they survive the current process of research approvals in the UK?

Authors:  L Sheard; C N E Tompkins; N M J Wright; C E Adams
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 2.903

Review 9.  Research protocols: waiving confidentiality for the greater good.

Authors:  An-Wen Chan; Ross Upshur; Jerome A Singh; Davina Ghersi; François Chapuis; Douglas G Altman
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2006-05-06

10.  Efficiency and the proposed reforms to the NHS research ethics system.

Authors:  David Hunter
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 2.903
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.