Literature DB >> 10631370

Role of laparoscopy in the initial multimodality management of patients with near-obstructing rectal cancer.

J B Koea1, J G Guillem, K C Conlon, B Minsky, L Saltz, A Cohen.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate the role of diagnostic laparoscopy in the multimodality management of locally advanced, near-obstructing rectal cancer. Fourteen patients with near-obstructing adenocarcinoma of the rectum (8 men and 6 women; mean age 49 years) underwent staging laparoscopy and formation of a sigmoid loop colostomy (n = 7), transverse colostomy (n = 4), or ileostomy (n = 3). The mean operative time was 78 minutes (range 67 to 94 minutes). All patients began a regular diet on postoperative day 1 and the median time to discharge was 4 days (range 2 to 8 days). Four patients were found to have diffuse peritoneal carcinomatosis not defined on preoperative CT scan. These patients died of disease within 6 months. Ten patients with advanced, localized pelvic disease began preoperative combined-modality treatment (5040 cGy external-beam radiation therapy in conjunction with 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin) between 8 and 13 days (median 9 days) following laparoscopy, and all underwent successful resection with clear margins in a median time of 12 weeks following laparoscopy. In the initial management of patients with near-obstructing advanced rectal cancer, laparoscopy can be both therapeutic and diagnostic by clarifying the site of the primary tumor, identifying patients with unsuspected peritoneal disease, and facilitating the formation of a defunctioning stoma with minimal morbidity. This leads to the early commencement of preoperative combined-modality treatment and does not compromise the prospects of subsequent tumor resection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10631370     DOI: 10.1016/s1091-255x(00)80040-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg        ISSN: 1091-255X            Impact factor:   3.452


  12 in total

1.  Primary versus staged resection for acute obstructing colorectal carcinoma.

Authors:  R Sjödahl; T Franzén; P O Nyström
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 6.939

Review 2.  Staging and management of colorectal cancer.

Authors:  J M Northover
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 3.  Laparoscopic versus open surgery for colorectal cancer.

Authors:  J W Milsom; S H Kim
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 4.  Laparoscopy in the management of gastric adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  E C Burke; M S Karpeh; K C Conlon; M F Brennan
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  Preliminary results of preoperative 5-fluorouracil, low-dose leucovorin, and concurrent radiation therapy for clinically resectable T3 rectal cancer.

Authors:  A Grann; B D Minsky; A M Cohen; L Saltz; J G Guillem; P B Paty; D P Kelsen; N Kemeny; D Ilson; J Bass-Loeb
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 4.585

6.  Obstructing carcinomas of the colon.

Authors:  J W Serpell; F T McDermott; H Katrivessis; E S Hughes
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1989-09       Impact factor: 6.939

7.  Locally advanced primary colorectal cancer: intraoperative electron and external beam irradiation +/- 5-FU.

Authors:  L L Gunderson; H Nelson; J A Martenson; S Cha; M Haddock; R Devine; J M Fieck; B Wolff; R Dozois; M J O'Connell
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  1997-02-01       Impact factor: 7.038

8.  Influence of tumour site on presentation, management and subsequent outcome in large bowel cancer.

Authors:  M C Aldridge; R K Phillips; R Hittinger; J S Fry; L P Fielding
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1986-08       Impact factor: 6.939

9.  The value of minimal access surgery in the staging of patients with potentially resectable peripancreatic malignancy.

Authors:  K C Conlon; E Dougherty; D S Klimstra; D G Coit; A D Turnbull; M F Brennan
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  Proximal colostomy: still an effective emergency measure in obstructing carcinoma of the large bowel.

Authors:  M Gutman; O Kaplan; Y Skornick; F Greif; P Kahn; R R Rozin
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 3.454

View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  Diagnostic laparoscopy: indications and benefits.

Authors:  Beate Rau; Michael Hünerbein
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2004-05-20       Impact factor: 3.445

2.  Clinical Utility of Staging Laparoscopy for Advanced Obstructing Rectal Adenocarcinoma: Emerging Tool.

Authors:  Avanish Saklani; P Sugoor; A Chaturvedi; R Bhamre; S Jatal; V Ostwal; R Engineer
Journal:  Indian J Surg Oncol       Date:  2018-08-02

3.  Laparoscopic approaches to rectal cancer.

Authors:  Bradley J Champagne; Conor P Delaney
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2007-08

4.  Laparoscopy for rectal cancer: the need for randomized trials.

Authors:  Thomas E Read; Peter W Marcello
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2006-02

Review 5.  Rectal Cancer in 2018: A Primer for the Gastroenterologist.

Authors:  Benjamin A Goldenberg; Emma B Holliday; Ramzi M Helewa; Harminder Singh
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 10.864

6.  The feasibility of laparoscopic colectomy in urgent and emergent settings.

Authors:  Brad Champagne; Jonah J Stulberg; Zhen Fan; Conor P Delaney
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-12-06       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Minimally Invasive Surgery is Associated with Improved Outcomes Following Urgent Inpatient Colectomy.

Authors:  Luv N Hajirawala; Varun Krishnan; Claudia Leonardi; Elyse R Bevier-Rawls; Guy R Orangio; Kurt G Davis; Aaron L Klinger; Jeffrey S Barton
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2022 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 1.789

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.