Literature DB >> 30538377

Clinical Utility of Staging Laparoscopy for Advanced Obstructing Rectal Adenocarcinoma: Emerging Tool.

Avanish Saklani1, P Sugoor1, A Chaturvedi1, R Bhamre1, S Jatal1, V Ostwal1,2, R Engineer1.   

Abstract

The multimodal treatment for advanced rectal adenocarcinoma mandates accurate preoperative staging with contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) of the thorax, abdomen, and pelvis, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the pelvis. Unlike gastric cancer, the role of staging laparoscopy (SL) in advanced colorectal cancer has not been evaluated. This study aims to evaluate the clinical value of SL in treatment decision-making for advanced rectal cancer (RC) with near or complete obstructing tumors. Observational review of colorectal database at Tata Memorial Hospital from January 2013 to December 2016 identified 562 patients diagnosed and treated for advanced RC. Of the 562 cases, 48.7% (274) were clinically and radiologically diagnosed of near or complete obstructing advanced RC. Medical records of 34% (94/274) who underwent SL with diversion stoma (DS) were analyzed. In the absence of ascites, extensive peritoneal deposits, and unresectable liver metastases on SL, a curative treatment was offered, which entailed neoadjuvant chemoradiation (NACTRT), whereas the cohort of patients with extensive peritoneal disease received palliative therapy. Of the 94 patients with advanced RC, conventional imaging studies staged 73.5% (69/94) cohort as non-metastatic locally advanced and 26.5% (25/94) had potentially resectable metastatic RC. Pre-therapeutic SL upstaged the disease by 26% (18/69) and 8% (2/25) in locally advanced and potentially resectable metastatic RC cohorts, respectively. Treatment decision changed in 21.2% (20/94) of the patients, and midline laparotomy was thus avoided. In our observational study, SL was found to be a safe and effective staging modality in RC; it detected occult peritoneal disease and prevented midline laparotomy in 21.2% of the cohort, which was of value to determine treatment strategy in patients with advanced RC before initiating NACTRT. SL and laparoscopic-assisted de-functioning stoma were associated with minimal morbidity and led to early initiation of NACTRT.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Diversion stoma; Neoadjuvant chemoradiation; Peritoneal deposits; Rectal cancer; Staging laparoscopy

Year:  2018        PMID: 30538377      PMCID: PMC6265173          DOI: 10.1007/s13193-018-0803-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Indian J Surg Oncol        ISSN: 0975-7651


  33 in total

1.  Clinical outcomes with laparoscopic stage M1, unresected gastric adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Abeezar I Sarela; Thomas J Miner; Martin S Karpeh; Daniel G Coit; David P Jaques; Murray F Brennan
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 2.  Diagnostic laparoscopy guidelines : This guideline was prepared by the SAGES Guidelines Committee and reviewed and approved by the Board of Governors of the Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES), November 2007.

Authors:  Yumi Hori
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-04-04       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 3.  Laparoscopic versus open surgery for colorectal cancer.

Authors:  J W Milsom; S H Kim
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  Predicting factors of unexpected peritoneal seeding in locally advanced gastric cancer: indications for staging laparoscopy.

Authors:  Hoon Hur; Han Hong Lee; Hun Jung; Kyo Young Song; Hae Myung Jeon; Cho Hyun Park
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2010-12-01       Impact factor: 3.454

5.  Colorectal carcinoma in young adults: a retrospective study on Indian patients: 2000-2008.

Authors:  S Gupta; D Bhattacharya; A N Acharya; S Majumdar; P Ranjan; S Das
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 3.788

6.  Proportionate increase in incidence of colorectal cancer at an age below 40 years: an observation.

Authors:  Madhumay Pal
Journal:  J Cancer Res Ther       Date:  2006 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 1.805

7.  Rectal cancer.

Authors:  Al B Benson; Tanios Bekaii-Saab; Emily Chan; Yi-Jen Chen; Michael A Choti; Harry S Cooper; Paul F Engstrom; Peter C Enzinger; Marwan G Fakih; Charles S Fuchs; Jean L Grem; Steven Hunt; Lucille A Leong; Edward Lin; Michael G Martin; Kilian Salerno May; Mary F Mulcahy; Kate Murphy; Eric Rohren; David P Ryan; Leonard Saltz; Sunil Sharma; David Shibata; John M Skibber; William Small; Constantinos T Sofocleous; Alan P Venook; Christopher G Willett; Deborah A Freedman-Cass; Kristina M Gregory
Journal:  J Natl Compr Canc Netw       Date:  2012-12-01       Impact factor: 11.908

Review 8.  Role of laparoscopy in the staging of gastrointestinal cancer.

Authors:  B L Jerby; J W Milsom
Journal:  Oncology (Williston Park)       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 2.990

9.  Proximal colostomy: still an effective emergency measure in obstructing carcinoma of the large bowel.

Authors:  M Gutman; O Kaplan; Y Skornick; F Greif; P Kahn; R R Rozin
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 3.454

10.  Upfront Systemic Chemotherapy and Short-Course Radiotherapy with Delayed Surgery for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer with Distant Metastases: Outcomes, Compliance, and Favorable Prognostic Factors.

Authors:  Hong In Yoon; Woong Sub Koom; Tae Hyung Kim; Joong Bae Ahn; Minkyu Jung; Tae Il Kim; Hoguen Kim; Sang Joon Shin; Nam Kyu Kim
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-08-18       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.