Literature DB >> 10628725

Associative learning in humans--conditioning of sensory-evoked brain activity.

W Skrandies1, A Jedynak.   

Abstract

A classical conditioning paradigm was employed in two experiments performed on 35 human volunteers. In nine subjects, the presentation of Landolt rings (conditioned stimuli, CS + ) was paired with an electric stimulus (unconditioned stimuli, UCS) applied to the left median nerve. Neutral visual control stimuli were full circles (CS -) that were not paired with the UCS. The skin conductance response (SCR) was determined in a time interval of 5 s after onset of the visual stimuli, and it was measured in the acquisition and test phase. Associative learning was reflected by a SCR occurring selectively with CS +. The same experiment was repeated with another group of 26 adults while electroencephalogram (EEG) was recorded from 30 electrodes. For each subject, mean evoked potentials were computed. In 13 of the subjects, a conditioning paradigm was followed while the other subjects served as the control group (non-contingent stimulation). There were somatosensory and visual brain activity evoked by the stimuli. Conditioned components were identified by computing cross-correlation between evoked somatosensory components and the averaged EEG. In the visual evoked brain activity, three components with mean latencies of 105.4, 183.2, and 360.3 ms were analyzed. Somatosensory stimuli were followed by major components that occurred at mean latencies of 48.8, 132.5, 219.7, 294.8, and 374.2 ms latency after the shock. All components were analyzed in terms of latency, field strength, and topographic characteristics, and were compared between groups and experimental conditions. Both visual and somatosensory brain activity was significantly affected by classical conditioning. Our data illustrate how associative learning affects the topography of brain electrical activity elicited by presentation of conditioned visual stimuli.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10628725     DOI: 10.1016/s0166-4328(99)00096-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Brain Res        ISSN: 0166-4328            Impact factor:   3.332


  7 in total

1.  Event-related potential components as measures of aversive conditioning in humans.

Authors:  Felix Bacigalupo; Steven J Luck
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2017-09-26       Impact factor: 4.016

2.  Plasticity of human auditory-evoked fields induced by shock conditioning and contingency reversal.

Authors:  Christian Kluge; Markus Bauer; Alexander Paul Leff; Hans-Jochen Heinze; Raymond J Dolan; Jon Driver
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-07-11       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Sympathetic responding to unconditioned stimuli predicts subsequent threat expectancy, orienting, and visuocortical bias in human aversive Pavlovian conditioning.

Authors:  L Forest Gruss; Andreas Keil
Journal:  Biol Psychol       Date:  2018-11-23       Impact factor: 3.251

Review 4.  Acquired fears reflected in cortical sensory processing: a review of electrophysiological studies of human classical conditioning.

Authors:  Vladimir Miskovic; Andreas Keil
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2012-06-21       Impact factor: 4.016

5.  Modulation of the N170 with Classical Conditioning: The Use of Emotional Imagery and Acoustic Startle in Healthy and Depressed Participants.

Authors:  David A Camfield; Jessica Mills; Emma J Kornfeld; Rodney J Croft
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2016-06-30       Impact factor: 3.169

6.  Social Pavlovian conditioning: Short- and long-term effects and the role of anxiety and depressive symptoms.

Authors:  Nicole Wiggert; Frank H Wilhelm; Sabrina Boger; Claudio Georgii; Wolfgang Klimesch; Jens Blechert
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2017-02-01       Impact factor: 3.436

7.  Long-Term Visuo-Gustatory Appetitive and Aversive Conditioning Potentiate Human Visual Evoked Potentials.

Authors:  Gert R J Christoffersen; Jakob L Laugesen; Per Møller; Wender L P Bredie; Todd R Schachtman; Christina Liljendahl; Ida Viemose
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2017-09-21       Impact factor: 3.169

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.