Literature DB >> 30476520

Sympathetic responding to unconditioned stimuli predicts subsequent threat expectancy, orienting, and visuocortical bias in human aversive Pavlovian conditioning.

L Forest Gruss1, Andreas Keil2.   

Abstract

Threat expectancy is the ability to predict an aversive outcome. What is not known is the influence of initial threat responding on the acquisition of verbal, attentional and perceptual biases towards conditioned threat cues. This study evaluated the extent to which initial unconditioned stimulus (UCS) responding was related to trial-by-trial self-reported expectancy, sensory processing (visuocortical EEG) and orienting (heart rate deceleration) to threat cues during extinction learning. Participants (n = 38) viewed oriented Gabor gratings, associated with the presence (CS+) or absence (CS-) of a 96 dB white noise (UCS), flickering at 12 Hz to elicit steady state visually evoked potentials (ssVEPs). Multivariate multiple regression revealed greater initial UCS skin conductance responding to predict extinction responding: enhanced visuocortical discrimination, greater heart rate deceleration to CS+, and greater threat expectancy endorsements. These results suggest that the motivational intensity of initial threat reactivity (sympathetic UCS responding) drives learning-induced defensive dispositions across multiple response systems.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Autonomic physiology; Expectancy; Pavlovian conditioning; Threat bias; ssVEP

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30476520      PMCID: PMC6343857          DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2018.11.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Psychol        ISSN: 0301-0511            Impact factor:   3.251


  67 in total

1.  Eyelid conditioning as a function of unconditioned stimulus intensity and intertrial interval.

Authors:  W F PROKASY; D A GRANT; N A MYERS
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1958-03

Review 2.  The role of the amygdala in fear and anxiety.

Authors:  M Davis
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 12.449

3.  Less is more: expectation sharpens representations in the primary visual cortex.

Authors:  Peter Kok; Janneke F M Jehee; Floris P de Lange
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2012-07-26       Impact factor: 17.173

4.  Associative learning in humans--conditioning of sensory-evoked brain activity.

Authors:  W Skrandies; A Jedynak
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  Guidance of spatial attention during associative learning: Contributions of predictability and intention to learn.

Authors:  Noelia Do Carmo Blanco; John J B Allen
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2018-03-23       Impact factor: 4.016

6.  Constraints on measuring heart rate and period sequentially through real and cardiac time.

Authors:  F K Graham
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  1978-09       Impact factor: 4.016

7.  Fear but not awareness predicts enhanced sensory processing in fear conditioning.

Authors:  Stephan Moratti; Andreas Keil; Gregory A Miller
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 4.016

8.  Fearful imagery in social phobia: generalization, comorbidity, and physiological reactivity.

Authors:  Lisa M McTeague; Peter J Lang; Marie-Claude Laplante; Bruce N Cuthbert; Cyd C Strauss; Margaret M Bradley
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2008-11-08       Impact factor: 13.382

9.  Rating data are underrated: validity of US expectancy in human fear conditioning.

Authors:  Yannick Boddez; Frank Baeyens; Laura Luyten; Debora Vansteenwegen; Dirk Hermans; Tom Beckers
Journal:  J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry       Date:  2012-08-31

10.  Expectancy and surprise predict neural and behavioral measures of attention to threatening stimuli.

Authors:  Michael Browning; Catherine J Harmer
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2011-09-16       Impact factor: 6.556

View more
  1 in total

1.  Navigating the garden of forking paths for data exclusions in fear conditioning research.

Authors:  Tina B Lonsdorf; Maren Klingelhöfer-Jens; Marta Andreatta; Tom Beckers; Anastasia Chalkia; Anna Gerlicher; Valerie L Jentsch; Shira Meir Drexler; Gaetan Mertens; Jan Richter; Rachel Sjouwerman; Julia Wendt; Christian J Merz
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2019-12-16       Impact factor: 8.140

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.