Literature DB >> 27154511

Time Sequence Evaluation of Biliary Stent Occlusion by Dissection Analysis of Retrieved Stents.

Chang-Il Kwon1, Mark A Gromski1, Stuart Sherman1, Jeffrey J Easler1, Ihab I El Hajj1, James Watkins1, Evan L Fogel1, Lee McHenry1, Glen A Lehman2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Multiple factors can affect the occlusion of plastic stents. Previous data demonstrate that side holes may induce more biofilm formation probably via microturbulence and bile flow disturbances that could lead to occlusion. These results, however, have not been replicated in subsequent clinical studies with different methods. The objective of this study is to evaluate the physical characteristics of plastic stent occlusion over time.
METHODS: This is a plastic stent sequential analysis study. Biliary stents removed via ERCP from February 24, 2015, to June 2, 2015, were included. One hundred and forty-eight retrieved straight-type plastic stents were longitudinally cut by a custom-made cutting device. These dissected stents were then evaluated in detail with regard to the location of stent occlusion and the stent patency period. Location of stent occlusive debris was the primary outcome in this study.
RESULTS: Biofilm formations and occlusions by debris were sequentially but separately tallied. Biofilm formations were initially seen around the side hole areas within 30 days and spread to the entire stent by 60 days. Then, occlusion process by debris was mainly initiated by 80 days and progressed to full occlusion by median of 90 days. Although some occlusions were also observed around the side hole areas within 30 days, affected areas were more widely observed after biofilm formation.
CONCLUSIONS: This study is the first to attempt to describe the distribution of stent occlusions over time. These observations may help guide future stent development.

Keywords:  Biofilm; Debris; Duodenal reflux; Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography; Occlusion; Stents

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27154511     DOI: 10.1007/s10620-016-4135-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dig Dis Sci        ISSN: 0163-2116            Impact factor:   3.199


  26 in total

1.  Experimental study of biliary endoprosthesis efficiency.

Authors:  J F Rey; P Maupetit; M Greff
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  1985-07       Impact factor: 10.093

2.  A prospective randomized trial of Teflon versus polyethylene stents for distal malignant biliary obstruction.

Authors:  A M van Berkel; C Boland; W K Redekop; J J Bergman; A K Groen; G N Tytgat; K Huibregtse
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 10.093

3.  Prospective randomized trial comparing Tannenbaum Teflon and standard polyethylene stents in distal malignant biliary stenosis.

Authors:  V Terruzzi; U Comin; F De Grazia; G L Toti; A Zambelli; S Beretta; G Minoli
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 9.427

4.  Hydrophilic hydromer-coated polyurethane stents versus uncoated stents in malignant biliary obstruction: a randomized trial.

Authors:  G Costamagna; M Mutignani; G Rotondano; L Cipolletta; L Ghezzo; A Foco; A Zambelli
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 9.427

5.  The role of bacteria in the blockage of biliary stents.

Authors:  J W Leung; T K Ling; J L Kung; J Vallance-Owen
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  1988 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 9.427

6.  Bacterial adherence to hydrophilic polymer-coated polyurethane stents.

Authors:  B Jansen; L P Goodman; D Ruiten
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  1993 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 9.427

7.  The occlusion rate of pancreatic stents.

Authors:  S O Ikenberry; S Sherman; R H Hawes; M Smith; G A Lehman
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  1994 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 9.427

8.  "Tannenbaum" Teflon stents versus traditional polyethylene stents for treatment of malignant biliary stricture.

Authors:  Marc F Catalano; Joseph E Geenen; Glen A Lehman; Jerome H Siegel; Leslie Jacob; Matthew J McKinley; Isaac Raijman; Peter Meier; Ira Jacobson; Richard Kozarek; Firas H Al-Kawas; Simon K Lo; Kulwinder S Dua; John Baille; Gregory G Ginsberg; William Parsons; Scott M Meyerson; Seth Cohen; Douglas B Nelson; James D McHattie; David L Carr-Locke
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 9.427

9.  Mechanisms of biliary stent clogging: confocal laser scanning and scanning electron microscopy.

Authors:  A M van Berkel; J van Marle; A K Groen; M J Bruno
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 10.093

10.  The Tannenbaum stent: a new plastic biliary stent without side holes.

Authors:  K F Binmoeller; U Seitz; H Seifert; F Thonke; S Sikka; N Soehendra
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 10.864

View more
  3 in total

1.  Predictive risk factors associated with cholangitis following ERCP.

Authors:  Joshua Tierney; Neal Bhutiani; Bryce Stamp; John S Richey; Michael H Bahr; Gary C Vitale
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-07-21       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  The Stent Patency and Migration Rate of Different Shaped Plastic Stents in Bile Flow Phantom Model and In Vivo Animal Bile Duct Dilation Model.

Authors:  Chang-Il Kwon; Gwangil Kim; Seok Jeong; Don Haeng Lee; Kyoung Ah Kim; Kwang Hyun Ko; Joo Young Cho; Sung Pyo Hong
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2017-03-09       Impact factor: 3.199

3.  What is the better surgical treatment option for recurrent common bile duct stones?

Authors:  Chi Young Park; Sung Hoon Choi; Chang-Il Kwon; Jae Hee Cho; Sung Ill Jang; Tae Hoon Lee; Joung-Ho Han; Seok Jeong; Kwang Hyun Ko
Journal:  Ann Surg Treat Res       Date:  2020-11-26       Impact factor: 1.859

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.