Literature DB >> 10622776

Not if, but how: one way to talk with patients about forgoing life support.

R Löfmark1, T Nilstun.   

Abstract

May the common clinical conversation be used to explore whether or not seriously ill patients want to talk about possible limitations of life support? In order to answer this question, a series of 20 seriously ill patients took part in an interview. The clinical conversations were taped and transcribed, and recurrent themes were identified and organised into categories. After talking about their diagnosis and prognosis, most patients said it was natural to talk about possible limitations of life support, and a substantial number immediately indicated that they did not want any life-sustaining treatment. Although their emotional reactions were different, no one seemed to be upset by talking about such issues. Many but not all patients said that they wanted a family member and possibly also a nurse to participate in the conversation. Every doctor learns to conduct a clinical conversation and this approach may be applied when talking with seriously ill patients about difficult treatment decisions.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Death and Euthanasia; Empirical Approach

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10622776      PMCID: PMC1741459          DOI: 10.1136/pmj.76.891.26

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Postgrad Med J        ISSN: 0032-5473            Impact factor:   2.401


  8 in total

1.  Qualitative methods for assessing health care.

Authors:  R Fitzpatrick; M Boulton
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  1994-06

2.  Do-not-resuscitate orders in Swedish medical wards.

Authors:  K Asplund; M Britton
Journal:  J Intern Med       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 8.989

3.  Do-not-resuscitate orders--should the patient be informed?

Authors:  R Löfmark; T Nilstun
Journal:  J Intern Med       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 8.989

Review 4.  Discussing cardiopulmonary resuscitation with patients and relatives.

Authors:  K Stewart
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 2.401

5.  Withholding cardiopulmonary resuscitation: proposals for formal guidelines.

Authors:  L Doyal; D Wilsher
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1993-06-12

6.  Do not resuscitate decisions: discussions with patients.

Authors:  S G Schade; H Muslin
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  1989-12       Impact factor: 2.903

7.  Deciding not to resuscitate in Dutch hospitals.

Authors:  J J van Delden; P J van der Maas; L Pijnenborg; C W Looman
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 2.903

8.  Prearrest predictors of survival following in-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  M H Ebell
Journal:  J Fam Pract       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 0.493

  8 in total
  1 in total

1.  Low adherence to legislation regarding Do-Not-Attempt-Cardiopulmonary-Resuscitation orders in a Swedish University Hospital.

Authors:  Eva Piscator; Therese Djärv; Katarina Rakovic; Emil Boström; Sune Forsberg; Martin J Holzmann; Johan Herlitz; Katarina Göransson
Journal:  Resusc Plus       Date:  2021-04-29
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.