Literature DB >> 2614787

Do not resuscitate decisions: discussions with patients.

S G Schade1, H Muslin.   

Abstract

The problem of psychological pain caused by discussions of do not resuscitate status with patients is addressed. Case histories of patients with such distress are given. We propose that not all patients should be informed of their do not resuscitate status, that the information about such status be given incrementally, and that the giving of further information be guided by the patient's reaction to earlier information. While some affirm the duty of the physician always to inform the patient about his or her do not resuscitate status, we affirm the duty of the physician to determine whether the patient wishes to enter into this discussion.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Death and Euthanasia; Professional Patient Relationship

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2614787      PMCID: PMC1375832          DOI: 10.1136/jme.15.4.186

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Ethics        ISSN: 0306-6800            Impact factor:   2.903


  5 in total

1.  On the do not resuscitate policy.

Authors:  H Muslin; S Schade
Journal:  Perspect Biol Med       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 1.416

Review 2.  Initiating and withdrawing life support. Principles and practice in adult medicine.

Authors:  J E Ruark; T A Raffin
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1988-01-07       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Respecting the autonomy of competent patients.

Authors:  M Angell
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1984-04-26       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Sounding board. "Code" or "no code": a nonlegal opinion.

Authors:  S S Spencer
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1979-01-18       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Do-not-resuscitate orders for critically ill patients in the hospital. How are they used and what is their impact?

Authors:  S E Bedell; D Pelle; P L Maher; P D Cleary
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1986-07-11       Impact factor: 56.272

  5 in total
  14 in total

1.  Not if, but how: one way to talk with patients about forgoing life support.

Authors:  R Löfmark; T Nilstun
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 2.401

2.  An analysis of CPR decision-making by elderly patients.

Authors:  G M Sayers; I Schofield; M Aziz
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 2.903

3.  Deciding not to resuscitate.

Authors:  R Gillon
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  1989-12       Impact factor: 2.903

4.  Resuscitation decisions in a general hospital.

Authors: 
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1990-05-12

5.  Improving the documentation and appropriateness of cardiopulmonary resuscitation decisions.

Authors:  C L Hignett; D R Forsyth; G D Connor
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 5.344

6.  Withholding cardiopulmonary resuscitation: proposals for formal guidelines.

Authors:  L Doyal; D Wilsher
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1993-06-12

7.  Cardiopulmonary resuscitation: who makes the decision?

Authors:  M E Hill; G MacQuillan; M Forsyth; D A Heath
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1994-06-25

8.  Decisions about cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

Authors:  D Florin
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1994-06-25

9.  Views of elderly patients and their relatives on cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

Authors:  R Morgan; D King; C Prajapati; J Rowe
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1994-06-25

10.  Involving patients in do not resuscitate (DNR) decisions: an old issue raising its ugly head.

Authors:  E H Loewy
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 2.903

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.