Literature DB >> 10618215

Genetic diversity of Vibrio cholerae in Chesapeake Bay determined by amplified fragment length polymorphism fingerprinting.

S C Jiang1, V Louis, N Choopun, A Sharma, A Huq, R R Colwell.   

Abstract

Vibrio cholerae is indigenous to the aquatic environment, and serotype non-O1 strains are readily isolated from coastal waters. However, in comparison with intensive studies of the O1 group, relatively little effort has been made to analyze the population structure and molecular evolution of non-O1 V. cholerae. In this study, high-resolution genomic DNA fingerprinting, amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP), was used to characterize the temporal and spatial genetic diversity of 67 V. cholerae strains isolated from Chesapeake Bay during April through July 1998, at four different sampling sites. Isolation of V. cholerae during the winter months (January through March) was unsuccessful, as observed in earlier studies (J. H. L. Kaper, R. R. Colwell, and S. W. Joseph, Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 37:91-103, 1979). AFLP fingerprints subjected to similarity analysis yielded a grouping of isolates into three large clusters, reflecting time of the year when the strains were isolated. April and May isolates were closely related, while July isolates were genetically diverse and did not cluster with the isolates obtained earlier in the year. The results suggest that the population structure of V. cholerae undergoes a shift in genotype that is linked to changes in environmental conditions. From January to July, the water temperature increased from 3 degrees C to 27.5 degrees C, bacterial direct counts increased nearly an order of magnitude, and the chlorophyll a concentration tripled (or even quadrupled at some sites). No correlation was observed between genetic similarity among isolates and geographical source of isolation, since isolates found at a single sampling site were genetically diverse and genetically identical isolates were found at several of the sampling sites. Thus, V. cholerae populations may be transported by surface currents throughout the entire Bay, or, more likely, similar environmental conditions may be selected for a specific genotype. The dynamic nature of the population structure of this bacterial species in Chesapeake Bay provides new insight into the ecology and molecular evolution of V. cholerae in the natural environment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10618215      PMCID: PMC91797          DOI: 10.1128/AEM.66.1.140-147.2000

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol        ISSN: 0099-2240            Impact factor:   4.792


  37 in total

1.  Analysis of 16S-23S rRNA intergenic spacer regions of Vibrio cholerae and Vibrio mimicus.

Authors:  J Chun; A Huq; R R Colwell
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Genetic diversity and population structure of Vibrio cholerae.

Authors:  P Beltrán; G Delgado; A Navarro; F Trujillo; R K Selander; A Cravioto
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Genetic diversity of clinical and environmental isolates of Vibrio cholerae determined by amplified fragment length polymorphism fingerprinting.

Authors:  S C Jiang; M Matte; G Matte; A Huq; R R Colwell
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Attachment of Vibrio cholerae serogroup O1 to zooplankton and phytoplankton of Bangladesh waters.

Authors:  M L Tamplin; A L Gauzens; A Huq; D A Sack; R R Colwell
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  Association of a disease approximating cholera caused by Vibrio cholerae of serogroups other than O1 and O139.

Authors:  M K Bhattacharya; D Dutta; S K Bhattacharya; A Deb; A K Mukhopadhyay; G B Nair; T Shimada; Y Takeda; A Chowdhury; D Mahalanabis
Journal:  Epidemiol Infect       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 2.451

6.  Ecology, serology, and enterotoxin production of Vibrio cholerae in Chesapeake Bay.

Authors:  J Kaper; H Lockman; R R Colwell; S W Joseph
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1979-01       Impact factor: 4.792

7.  Molecular characterization of Vibrio cholerae O1 strains by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis.

Authors:  D N Cameron; F M Khambaty; I K Wachsmuth; R V Tauxe; T J Barrett
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  Molecular evolution of the seventh-pandemic clone of Vibrio cholerae and its relationship to other pandemic and epidemic V. cholerae isolates.

Authors:  D K Karaolis; R Lan; P R Reeves
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 3.490

9.  Vibrio cholerae O22 might be a putative source of exogenous DNA resulting in the emergence of the new strain of Vibrio cholerae O139.

Authors:  S Dumontier; P Berche
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Lett       Date:  1998-07-01       Impact factor: 2.742

10.  Genome size and restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis of Vibrio cholerae strains belonging to different serovars and biotypes.

Authors:  S R Choudhury; R K Bhadra; J Das
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Lett       Date:  1994-01-15       Impact factor: 2.742

View more
  22 in total

1.  Prevalence of cholera toxin genes (ctxA and zot) among non-O1/O139 Vibrio cholerae strains from Newport Bay, California.

Authors:  Sunny Jiang; Weiping Chu; Wuxia Fu
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 2.  Biodiversity of vibrios.

Authors:  Fabiano L Thompson; Tetsuya Iida; Jean Swings
Journal:  Microbiol Mol Biol Rev       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 11.056

3.  Phenotypic and genotypic characterization Vibrio cholerae O139 of clinical and aquatic isolates in China.

Authors:  Bai-sheng Li; Hai-ling Tan; Duo-chun Wang; Xiao-ling Deng; Jing-diao Chen; Hao-jie Zhong; Bi-xia Ke; Chang-wen Ke; Biao Kan
Journal:  Curr Microbiol       Date:  2010-11-16       Impact factor: 2.188

4.  Relationships between environmental factors and pathogenic Vibrios in the Northern Gulf of Mexico.

Authors:  C N Johnson; A R Flowers; N F Noriea; A M Zimmerman; J C Bowers; A DePaola; D J Grimes
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2010-09-03       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  A glimpse into the expanded genome content of Vibrio cholerae through identification of genes present in environmental strains.

Authors:  Alexandra Purdy; Forest Rohwer; Rob Edwards; Farooq Azam; Douglas H Bartlett
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 3.490

6.  Antagonistic interactions among marine bacteria impede the proliferation of Vibrio cholerae.

Authors:  Richard A Long; David C Rowley; Eric Zamora; Jiayuan Liu; Douglas H Bartlett; Farooq Azam
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 4.792

7.  Non-O1/non-O139 Vibrio cholerae carrying multiple virulence factors and V. cholerae O1 in the Chesapeake Bay, Maryland.

Authors:  Daniela Ceccarelli; Arlene Chen; Nur A Hasan; Shah M Rashed; Anwar Huq; Rita R Colwell
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2015-01-02       Impact factor: 4.792

8.  Multilocus sequence typing has better discriminatory ability for typing Vibrio cholerae than does pulsed-field gel electrophoresis and provides a measure of phylogenetic relatedness.

Authors:  Mamuka Kotetishvili; O Colin Stine; Yuansha Chen; Arnold Kreger; Alexander Sulakvelidze; Shanmuga Sozhamannan; J Glenn Morris
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 5.948

9.  Fluorescent amplified fragment length polymorphism and repetitive extragenic palindrome-PCR fingerprinting reveal host-specific genetic diversity of Vibrio halioticoli-like strains isolated from the gut of Japanese abalone.

Authors:  Tomoo Sawabe; Fabiano L Thompson; Jeroen Heyrman; Margo Cnockaert; Karin Hayashi; Reiji Tanaka; Mamoru Yoshimizu; Bart Hoste; Jean Swings; Yoshio Ezura
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 4.792

10.  Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis analysis of Vibrio vulnificus strains isolated from Taiwan and the United States.

Authors:  Hin-Chung Wong; Shau-Yan Chen; Meng-Yi Chen; James D Oliver; Lien-I Hor; Wen-Cherng Tsai
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 4.792

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.