Literature DB >> 10615463

Visual processing and dyslexia.

J Everatt1, M F Bradshaw, P B Hibbard.   

Abstract

Magnocellular-pathway deficits have been hypothesized to be responsible for the problems experienced by dyslexic individuals in reading. However, research has yet to provide a detailed account of the consequences of these deficits or to identify the behavioural link between them and reading disabilities. The aim of the present study was to determine the potential consequences of the magnocellular-pathway deficits for dyslexics in a comprehensive range of visual tasks. Dyslexics and nondyslexics were compared on their ability to (i) perform vernier-acuity and orientation-acuity tasks; (ii) perceive motion by using a range of measures common in the psychophysical literature (Dmin, Dmax, and global coherence); and (iii) perceive shapes presented in random-dot stereograms at a range of disparity pedestals, thereby dissociating stereopsis from vergence control. The results indicated no significant differences in performance between the dyslexic and nondyslexic subjects in terms of the visual-acuity measures. In general, dyslexics performed relatively poorly on measures of motion perception and stereopsis, although when considered individually some of the dyslexics performed better than some of the controls. The poor performance of the dyslexics in the stereo-gram tasks was attributable to a subgroup of dyslexics who also appeared to have severe difficulty with the motion-coherence task. These data are consistent with previous evidence that some dyslexics may have deficits within the magnocellular visual pathway.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10615463     DOI: 10.1068/p2743

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Perception        ISSN: 0301-0066            Impact factor:   1.490


  10 in total

1.  Not completed but still identified: orthographic closure and word recognition among poor and typical native Arab readers.

Authors:  Haitham Taha; Floreen Asous-Abu Rezeq
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2020-10-30

2.  Vernier But Not Grating Acuity Contributes to an Early Stage of Visual Word Processing.

Authors:  Yufei Tan; Xiuhong Tong; Wei Chen; Xuchu Weng; Sheng He; Jing Zhao
Journal:  Neurosci Bull       Date:  2018-03-28       Impact factor: 5.203

3.  The effect of print size on reading speed in dyslexia.

Authors:  Beth A O'Brien; J Stephen Mansfield; Gordon E Legge
Journal:  J Res Read       Date:  2005-08

4.  Language, reading, and math learning profiles in an epidemiological sample of school age children.

Authors:  Lisa M D Archibald; Janis Oram Cardy; Marc F Joanisse; Daniel Ansari
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-10-14       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Parietal function in good and poor readers.

Authors:  Robin Laycock; Sheila G Crewther; Patricia M Kiely; David P Crewther
Journal:  Behav Brain Funct       Date:  2006-08-01       Impact factor: 3.759

Review 6.  Factors influencing work participation of adults with developmental dyslexia: a systematic review.

Authors:  Joost de Beer; Josephine Engels; Yvonne Heerkens; Jac van der Klink
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2014-01-24       Impact factor: 3.295

7.  What Stroop tasks can tell us about selective attention from childhood to adulthood.

Authors:  Barlow C Wright
Journal:  Br J Psychol       Date:  2016-10-27

8.  Measuring Early Cortical Visual Processing in the Clinic.

Authors:  Linda Bowns; William H A Beaudot
Journal:  Iperception       Date:  2017-05-17

9.  Why is the processing of global motion impaired in adults with developmental dyslexia?

Authors:  Richard Johnston; Nicola J Pitchford; Neil W Roach; Timothy Ledgeway
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  2016-07-16       Impact factor: 2.310

10.  Neural sources of letter and Vernier acuity.

Authors:  Elham Barzegaran; Anthony M Norcia
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-09-22       Impact factor: 4.379

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.