Literature DB >> 10604741

Genetic alterations on chromosome 16 and 17 are important features of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast and are associated with histologic type.

C B Vos1, N T ter Haar, C Rosenberg, J L Peterse, A M Cleton-Jansen, C J Cornelisse, M J van de Vijver.   

Abstract

We analysed the involvement of known and putative tumour suppressor- and oncogene loci in ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) by microsatellite analysis (LOH), Southern blotting and comparative genomic hybridization (CGH). A total of 78 pure DCIS cases, classified histologically as well, intermediately and poorly differentiated, were examined for LOH with 76 markers dispersed along all chromosome arms. LOH on chromosome 17 was more frequent in poorly differentiated DCIS (70%) Compared to well-differentiated DCIS (17%), whereas loss on chromosome 16 was associated with well- and intermediately differentiated DCIS (66%). For a subset we have done Southern blot-and CGH analysis. C-erbB2/neu was amplified in 30% of poorly differentiated DCIS. No amplification was found of c-myc, mdm2, bek, flg and the epidermal growth factor (EGF)-receptor. By CGH, most frequent alterations in poorly differentiated DCIS were gains on 8q and 17q22-24 and deletion on 17p, whereas in well-differentiated DCIS amplification on chromosome 1q and deletion on 16q were found. In conclusion, our data indicates that inactivation of a yet unknown tumour suppressor gene on chromosome 16q is implicated in the development of most well and intermediately differentiated DCIS whereas amplification and inactivation of various genes on chromosome 17 are implicated in the development of poorly differentiated DCIS. Furthermore these data show that there is a genetic basis for the classification of DCIS in a well and poorly differentiated type and support the evidence of different genetic routes to develop a specific type of carcinoma in situ of the breast.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10604741      PMCID: PMC2362977          DOI: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6693372

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Cancer        ISSN: 0007-0920            Impact factor:   7.640


  38 in total

1.  Genetic changes in intraductal breast cancer detected by comparative genomic hybridization.

Authors:  T Kuukasjärvi; M Tanner; S Pennanen; R Karhu; O P Kallioniemi; J Isola
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 4.307

2.  High frequency in vivo loss of heterozygosity is primarily a consequence of mitotic recombination.

Authors:  P K Gupta; A Sahota; S A Boyadjiev; S Bye; C Shao; J P O'Neill; T C Hunter; R J Albertini; P J Stambrook; J A Tischfield
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1997-03-15       Impact factor: 12.701

3.  Genetic progression, histological grade, and allelic loss in ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast.

Authors:  H Fujii; R Szumel; C Marsh; W Zhou; E Gabrielson
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1996-11-15       Impact factor: 12.701

4.  TP53 alterations in atypical ductal hyperplasia and ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast.

Authors:  M Chitemerere; T I Andersen; R Holm; F Karlsen; A L Børresen; J M Nesland
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 4.872

5.  Comparative genomic hybridisation of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: identification of regions of DNA amplification and deletion in common with invasive breast carcinoma.

Authors:  L A James; E L Mitchell; L Menasce; J M Varley
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  1997-03-06       Impact factor: 9.867

6.  Mutation of the TP53 gene and allelic imbalance at chromosome 17p13 in ductal carcinoma in situ.

Authors:  K E Munn; R A Walker; L Menasce; J M Varley
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 7.640

7.  Allelotyping of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: deletion of loci on 8p, 13q, 16q, 17p and 17q.

Authors:  D M Radford; K L Fair; N J Phillips; J H Ritter; T Steinbrueck; M S Holt; H Donis-Keller
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1995-08-01       Impact factor: 12.701

8.  Comparative allelotype of in situ and invasive human breast cancer: high frequency of microsatellite instability in lobular breast carcinomas.

Authors:  C M Aldaz; T Chen; A Sahin; J Cunningham; M Bondy
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1995-09-15       Impact factor: 12.701

9.  Allelic imbalance in the region of the BRCA1 gene in ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast.

Authors:  K E Munn; R A Walker; L Menasce; J M Varley
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  E-cadherin is a tumour/invasion suppressor gene mutated in human lobular breast cancers.

Authors:  G Berx; A M Cleton-Jansen; F Nollet; W J de Leeuw; M van de Vijver; C Cornelisse; F van Roy
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1995-12-15       Impact factor: 11.598

View more
  24 in total

Review 1.  Cell polarity in motion: redefining mammary tissue organization through EMT and cell polarity transitions.

Authors:  Nathan J Godde; Ryan C Galea; Imogen A Elsum; Patrick O Humbert
Journal:  J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia       Date:  2010-05-12       Impact factor: 2.673

2.  Loss of heterozygosity on chromosome 16q suggests malignancy in core needle biopsy specimens of intraductal papillary breast lesions.

Authors:  Miwa Yoshida; Hitoshi Tsuda; Sohei Yamamoto; Takayuki Kinoshita; Sadako Akashi-Tanaka; Takashi Hojo; Takashi Fukutomi
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2012-04-04       Impact factor: 4.064

3.  Infrequent mutation of ATBF1 in human breast cancer.

Authors:  Xiaodong Sun; Yingfa Zhou; Kristen B Otto; Mingrong Wang; Ceshi Chen; Wei Zhou; Krithika Subramanian; Paula M Vertino; Jin-Tang Dong
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2006-08-24       Impact factor: 4.553

Review 4.  Maintenance of cell type diversification in the human breast.

Authors:  Agla Jael Rubner Fridriksdottir; René Villadsen; Thorarinn Gudjonsson; Ole William Petersen
Journal:  J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 2.673

5.  Immunohistochemical and cytogenetic characterization of acantholytic squamous cell carcinoma of the breast.

Authors:  Sebastian Aulmann; Philipp A Schnabel; Birgit Helmchen; Hendrik Dienemann; Peter Drings; Herwart F Otto; Hans Peter Sinn
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2005-01-25       Impact factor: 4.064

6.  Evaluation of breast cancer polyclonality by combined chromosome banding and comparative genomic hybridization analysis.

Authors:  M R Teixeira; H Tsarouha; S M Kraggerud; N Pandis; E Dimitriadis; J A Andersen; R A Lothe; S Heim
Journal:  Neoplasia       Date:  2001 May-Jun       Impact factor: 5.715

7.  Multicolor immunofluorescence reveals that p63- and/or K5-positive progenitor cells contribute to normal breast epithelium and usual ductal hyperplasia but not to low-grade intraepithelial neoplasia of the breast.

Authors:  Werner Boecker; Göran Stenman; Tina Schroeder; Udo Schumacher; Thomas Loening; Lisa Stahnke; Catharina Löhnert; Robert Michael Siering; Arthur Kuper; Vera Samoilova; Markus Tiemann; Eberhard Korsching; Igor Buchwalow
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2017-03-16       Impact factor: 4.064

8.  Copy number analysis of ductal carcinoma in situ with and without recurrence.

Authors:  Kylie L Gorringe; Sally M Hunter; Jia-Min Pang; Ken Opeskin; Prue Hill; Simone M Rowley; David Y H Choong; Ella R Thompson; Alexander Dobrovic; Stephen B Fox; G Bruce Mann; Ian G Campbell
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2015-06-19       Impact factor: 7.842

9.  Classification of ductal carcinoma in situ by gene expression profiling.

Authors:  Juliane Hannemann; Arno Velds; Johannes B G Halfwerk; Bas Kreike; Johannes L Peterse; Marc J van de Vijver
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 6.466

10.  FGFR1 is amplified during the progression of in situ to invasive breast carcinoma.

Authors:  Min Jang; Eun Kim; Yoomi Choi; Hee Lee; Yu Kim; Jee Kim; Eunyoung Kang; Sung-Won Kim; In Kim; So Park
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2012-08-03       Impact factor: 6.466

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.