Literature DB >> 25483123

Success rates of manual restorative treatment (MRT) with amalgam in permanent teeth in high caries-risk Filipino children.

I M Schüler1, B Monse, C J Holmgren, T Lehmann, G S Itchon, R Heinrich-Weltzien.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The objective of the study is to evaluate the success rate of amalgam restorations in manually prepared cavities under field conditions within a comprehensive school-based oral health-care program in high caries-risk children.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 1322 restorations were placed in the permanent teeth of 619 high caries risk Filipino children by two dentists and two trained health-care workers. Only hand instruments and an encapsulated amalgam, mixed with a manually powered amalgamator, were used. The restorations were evaluated after a service time of 1 to 5 years using modified atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) criteria.
RESULTS: The overall success rate of the amalgam restorations was 95.3% (n = 1260) after a mean service time of 2.7 years (SD = 1.4). Multiple-surface restorations showed significantly higher failure rates (11.4%) than single-surface occlusal (4.7%) and single-surface non-occlusal (2.1%) restorations; 93.6% of large restorations was performed successfully, but had a risk of failure twice to that of small restorations (odds ratio (OR) = 2.141). The score of the decayed, missing, and filled teeth (DMFT) index had significant influence on the success rate. The risk of restoration failure increased by 11.5% for each unit increase in DMFT (OR = 1.148). Neither the operator nor age nor gender of the patient had a significant effect on the success rate of the restorations.
CONCLUSION: Amalgam was performed satisfactorily as a filling material when placed under field conditions in manually prepared cavities in the permanent dentition of high caries-risk children. Success of the restorations was influenced by the patient's caries experience (DMFT), restoration size, and service time. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Manual restorative treatment (MRT) amalgam restorations were performed satisfactorily, but higher dental caries experience and large cavities contribute to lower success rates.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25483123     DOI: 10.1007/s00784-014-1374-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Oral Investig        ISSN: 1432-6981            Impact factor:   3.573


  39 in total

1.  Effectiveness of three minimal intervention approaches for managing dental caries: survival of restorations after 2 years.

Authors:  G J Mandari; G J Truin; M A van't Hof; J E Frencken
Journal:  Caries Res       Date:  2001 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 4.056

2.  How effective is ART in the management of dental caries?

Authors:  J E Frencken; C J Holmgren
Journal:  Community Dent Oral Epidemiol       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 3.383

Review 3.  Selection of restorative materials for the atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) approach: a review.

Authors:  H K Yip; R J Smales; H C Ngo; F R Tay; F C Chu
Journal:  Spec Care Dentist       Date:  2001 Nov-Dec

4.  Long-term cost of direct Class II molar restorations.

Authors:  Petteri Sjögren; Arne Halling
Journal:  Swed Dent J       Date:  2002

Review 5.  The atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) approach for the management of dental caries.

Authors:  Roger J Smales; Hak-Kong Yip
Journal:  Quintessence Int       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 1.677

6.  Assessment of manual restorative treatment (MRT) with amalgam in high-caries Filipino children: results after 2 years.

Authors:  B Monse-Schneider; R Heinrich-Weltzien; D Schug; A Sheiham; A Borutta
Journal:  Community Dent Oral Epidemiol       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 3.383

7.  Survival of ART and amalgam restorations in permanent teeth of children after 6.3 years.

Authors:  J E Frencken; D Taifour; M A van 't Hof
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 6.116

8.  Do socioeconomic determinants affect the quality of posterior dental restorations? A multilevel approach.

Authors:  Marcos B Correa; Marcos A Peres; Karen G Peres; Bernardo L Horta; Aluísio J Barros; Flavio Fernando Demarco
Journal:  J Dent       Date:  2013-02-27       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Amalgam or composite fillings--which material lasts longer?

Authors:  Dominic Hurst
Journal:  Evid Based Dent       Date:  2014-06

10.  ART restorations and sealants placed in Chinese school children--results after three years.

Authors:  C J Holmgren; E C Lo; D Hu; H Wan
Journal:  Community Dent Oral Epidemiol       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 3.383

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.