Literature DB >> 10599846

Mismatch negativity in the visual modality.

A Tales1, P Newton, T Troscianko, S Butler.   

Abstract

In the auditory system, the automatic detection of stimulus change provides a mechanism for switching attention to biologically significant events. It gives rise to the mismatch negativity (MMN) event related potential. It is unclear whether a similar mechanism exists in vision. To investigate this issue, evoked potentials were recorded to target stimuli in the centre of the visual field, and to frequent standard and infrequent deviant stimuli presented outside the focus of attention, in the peripheral field. Deviants evoked a more negative potential than standards 250-400 ms after the stimulus. The negativity, distributed over supplementary visual areas of occipital and posterior temporal cortex, was associated with the rarity of the deviants and not the physical features which distinguished them from standards. This negativity shares a number of characteristics with auditory MMN.

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10599846     DOI: 10.1097/00001756-199911080-00020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroreport        ISSN: 0959-4965            Impact factor:   1.837


  28 in total

1.  Automatic attention to emotional stimuli: neural correlates.

Authors:  Luis Carretié; José A Hinojosa; Manuel Martín-Loeches; Francisco Mercado; Manuel Tapia
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Reflection of an orienting reflex in the phases of evoked potentials in the rabbit visual cortex and hippocampus during substitution of stimulus intensity.

Authors:  V B Polyanskii; D V Evtikhin; E N Sokolov
Journal:  Neurosci Behav Physiol       Date:  2004-01

3.  Subjective present: a window of temporal integration indexed by mismatch negativity.

Authors:  Lingyan Wang; Xiaoxiong Lin; Bin Zhou; Ernst Pöppel; Yan Bao
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2015-09

4.  Functional magnetic resonance imaging measure of automatic and controlled auditory processing.

Authors:  Teresa V Mitchell; Rajendra A Morey; Seniha Inan; Aysenil Belger
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2005-04-04       Impact factor: 1.837

5.  Limited plasticity of difference neurons in the visual cortex and hippocampus in rabbits during the oddball (random substitutions) test.

Authors:  V B Polyanskii; D V Evtikhin; E N Sokolov; A V Kryuchkova
Journal:  Neurosci Behav Physiol       Date:  2006-06

6.  Visual cues can modulate integration and segregation of objects in auditory scene analysis.

Authors:  Torsten Rahne; Martin Böckmann; Hellmut von Specht; Elyse S Sussman
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2007-01-27       Impact factor: 3.252

7.  Can illusory deviant stimuli be used as attentional distractors to record vMMN in a passive three stimulus oddball paradigm?

Authors:  Maria Flynn; Alki Liasis; Mark Gardner; Stewart Boyd; Tony Towell
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-06-24       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Exploring the Role of Low Level Visual Processing in Letter-Speech Sound Integration: A Visual MMN Study.

Authors:  Dries Froyen; Nienke van Atteveldt; Leo Blomert
Journal:  Front Integr Neurosci       Date:  2010-04-13

9.  Longer storage of auditory than of visual information in the rabbit brain: evidence from dorsal hippocampal electrophysiology.

Authors:  Piia Astikainen; Timo Ruusuvirta; Tapani Korhonen
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-07-28       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Event-related potentials to task-irrelevant changes in facial expressions.

Authors:  Piia Astikainen; Jari K Hietanen
Journal:  Behav Brain Funct       Date:  2009-07-20       Impact factor: 3.759

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.