Literature DB >> 10594702

The protective effects of high amylose maize (amylomaize) starch granules on the survival of Bifidobacterium spp. in the mouse intestinal tract.

X Wang1, I L Brown, A J Evans, P L Conway.   

Abstract

The possibility of using high amylose maize starch granules as a delivery system for probiotic bacteria has been investigated using Bifidobacterium spp. LaftiTM 8B and LaftiTM 13B which were isolated from a healthy human. The Bifidobacterium cells were able to adhere to the amylomaize starch granules and were also able to hydrolyse the starch during growth. Initially, in vitro studies were carried out by studying the survival of strains Bifidobacterium LaftiTM 8B and LaftiTM 13B when exposed to pH 2.3, 3.5 and 6.5 as well as 0.03 and 0.05% w/v bile acids. Both strains were grown either in the absence or presence of high amylose maize starch granules, then mixed with the high amylose maize starch granules and exposed to acidic buffers or bile acid solutions. It was shown that growth in and the presence of high amylose maize starch granules led to enhanced survival of strains LaftiTM 8B and LaftiTM 13B. Subsequently, survival in vivo was monitored by measuring the faecal level of Bifidobacterium LaftiTM 8B after oral administration of the strain to mice. A sixfold better recovery of strain LaftiTM 8B from mice faeces after oral dosage was noted for cells grown in amylose-containing medium compared with controls. It was concluded that high amylose maize starch granules contributed to enhanced survival of Bifidobacterium sp. LaftiTM 8B and LaftiTM 13B.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10594702     DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2672.1999.00836.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Appl Microbiol        ISSN: 1364-5072            Impact factor:   3.772


  11 in total

1.  Adhesion of bifidobacteria to granular starch and its implications in probiotic technologies.

Authors:  R Crittenden; A Laitila; P Forssell; J Mättö; M Saarela; T Mattila-Sandholm; P Myllärinen
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 2.  Conserved and variable responses of the gut microbiome to resistant starch type 2.

Authors:  Zachary A Bendiks; Knud E B Knudsen; Michael J Keenan; Maria L Marco
Journal:  Nutr Res       Date:  2020-02-22       Impact factor: 3.315

3.  Chemostat enrichments of human feces with resistant starch are selective for adherent butyrate-producing clostridia at high dilution rates.

Authors:  R Sharp; G T Macfarlane
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Comparative effects of a high-amylose starch and a fructooligosaccharide on fecal bifidobacteria numbers and short-chain fatty acids in pigs fed Bifidobacterium animalis.

Authors:  Anthony R Bird; Michelle Vuaran; Ross Crittenden; Takashi Hayakawa; Martin J Playne; Ian L Brown; David L Topping
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2008-12-17       Impact factor: 3.199

5.  Microencapsulation of Probiotics by Calcium Alginate-gelatinized Starch with Chitosan Coating and Evaluation of Survival in Simulated Human Gastro-intestinal Condition.

Authors:  Mohammad Ali Khosravi Zanjani; Babak Ghiassi Tarzi; Anousheh Sharifan; Nima Mohammadi
Journal:  Iran J Pharm Res       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 1.696

6.  Microscale spatial analysis provides evidence for adhesive monopolization of dietary nutrients by specific intestinal bacteria.

Authors:  Yusuke Nagara; Toshihiko Takada; Yuriko Nagata; Shoichi Kado; Akira Kushiro
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-04-10       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Promoting Probiotics Survival by Microencapsualtion with Hylon Starch and Genipin Cross-linked Coatings in Simulated Gastro-intestinal Condition and Heat Treatment.

Authors:  Mohammad Ali Khosravi Zanjani; Mohammad Reza Ehsani; Babak Ghiassi Tarzi; Anousheh Sharifan
Journal:  Iran J Pharm Res       Date:  2018       Impact factor: 1.696

8.  Probiotic Bifidobacterium strains and galactooligosaccharides improve intestinal barrier function in obese adults but show no synergism when used together as synbiotics.

Authors:  Janina A Krumbeck; Heather E Rasmussen; Robert W Hutkins; Jennifer Clarke; Krista Shawron; Ali Keshavarzian; Jens Walter
Journal:  Microbiome       Date:  2018-06-28       Impact factor: 14.650

9.  Probiotic Properties of Lactobacillus paracasei subsp. paracasei L1 and Its Growth Performance-Promotion in Chicken by Improving the Intestinal Microflora.

Authors:  Yunhe Xu; Yuan Tian; Yunfang Cao; Jianguo Li; Haonan Guo; Yuhong Su; Yumin Tian; Cheng Wang; Tianqi Wang; Lili Zhang
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2019-07-25       Impact factor: 4.566

10.  Impact of oral probiotic Lactobacillus acidophilus vaccine strains on the immune response and gut microbiome of mice.

Authors:  Zaid Abdo; Jonathan LeCureux; Alora LaVoy; Bridget Eklund; Elizabeth P Ryan; Gregg A Dean
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-12-12       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.