Literature DB >> 10588346

The role of fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) in the investigation of superficial lymphadenopathy; uses and limitations of the technique.

T F Lioe1, H Elliott, D C Allen, R A Spence.   

Abstract

Aspirates (n = 163) from 157 patients with enlarged superficial lymph nodes were obtained over a 5-year period in a combined surgical/FNAC clinic. A definitive diagnosis was achieved in over 77% of the cases: benign 52.7%, malignant 25.1%. The diagnostic accuracy was 94.4%, sensitivity 85.4%, and specificity 100%. The false-negative rate was 12.5% but decreased to 3.5% when lymphoma cases were excluded. There were 36 cases of metastatic disease, the majority of which were from a primary breast carcinoma. The main diagnostic difficulty was in distinguishing low-grade lymphoma from reactive hyperplasia. An added advantage was that aspirated material could be used in ancillary tests to help with the differential diagnosis. FNAC has a well-defined role in the investigation of superficial lymphadenopathy. Used in the proper setting it will provide a definitive diagnosis in the majority of cases, especially relating to recurrent malignancy or metastatic disease. Patients with a reactive cytological picture and no clinically suspicious symptoms could be spared unnecessary surgery and reviewed through follow up. This technique is cost-effective, of high diagnostic accuracy, and results in considerable resource savings.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10588346     DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2303.1999.00183.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cytopathology        ISSN: 0956-5507            Impact factor:   2.073


  13 in total

1.  Value of fine needle aspiration cell blocks in the diagnosis and classification of lymphoma.

Authors:  Shuhong Zhang; Xiaomeng Yu; Yuanyuan Zheng; Yan Yang; Jianlan Xie; Xiaoge Zhou
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Pathol       Date:  2014-10-15

2.  Castleman's disease of a submandibular mass diagnosed on Fine Needle Cytology: Report of a case with histopathological, immunocytochemical and imaging correlations.

Authors:  Maria Gabriella Malzone; Anna Cipolletta Campanile; Veronica Sanna; Franco Ionna; Francesco Longo; Annarosaria De Chiara; Sergio Venanzio Setola; Gerardo Botti; Franco Fulciniti
Journal:  Intractable Rare Dis Res       Date:  2016-02

3.  Ultrasound-guided core biopsy in the diagnosis of lymphoma of the head and neck. A 9 year experience.

Authors:  C Burke; R Thomas; C Inglis; A Baldwin; K Ramesar; R Grace; D C Howlett
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2011-03-22       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 4.  Best Practice No 185. Cytological and molecular diagnosis of lymphoma.

Authors:  G Kocjan
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 3.411

5.  Waiting time to lymph node biopsy is dependent on referral method: don't write, phone!

Authors:  S A J Pannick; C L Ingham Clark
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2009-09-25       Impact factor: 1.891

6.  Diagnostic biopsy of lymph nodes of the neck, axilla and groin: rhyme, reason or chance?

Authors:  James W Moor; Patrick Murray; Jane Inwood; David Gouldesbrough; Chris Bem
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 1.891

7.  Efficacy of laparoscopic mesenteric/retroperitoneal lymph node biopsy.

Authors:  Lewis Diulus; Sricharan Chalikonda; Tracy Pitt; Steven Rosenblatt
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-05-07       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) in the diagnosis of granulomatous lymphadenitis.

Authors:  V Koo; T F Lioe; R A J Spence
Journal:  Ulster Med J       Date:  2006-01

Review 9.  Peripheral lymphadenopathy: approach and diagnostic tools.

Authors:  Shahrzad Mohseni; Abolfazl Shojaiefard; Zhamak Khorgami; Shahriar Alinejad; Ali Ghorbani; Ali Ghafouri
Journal:  Iran J Med Sci       Date:  2014-03

10.  Does the surgeon still have a role to play in the diagnosis and management of lymphomas?

Authors:  Gareth Morris-Stiff; Peipei Cheang; Steve Key; Anju Verghese; Timothy J Havard
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2008-02-04       Impact factor: 2.754

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.