Literature DB >> 8664807

Breast size and mammographic pattern in relation to breast cancer risk.

E Thurfjell1, C C Hsieh, L Lipworth, A Ekbom, H O Adami, D Trichopoulos.   

Abstract

The relation of Wolfe's parenchymal patterns and radiographically-assessed breast size with breast cancer risk was evaluated in a population-based nested case-control study in Uppsala, Sweden. All women who attended a mammographic screening programme in Uppsala county starting in 1988 have been followed for the occurrence of breast cancer through 1993. The analysis was based on 295 cases and 589 age-matched controls, whose mammograms were blindly evaluated for parenchymal pattern and breast size. Women with P2 or DY pattern had a significantly elevated risk of breast cancer compared with women with N1 or P1 (OR = 2.09; 95% CI = 1.52-2.86). There was an inverse association of breast size with breast cancer risk, which disappeared after adjusting for parenchymal pattern, because breasts of smaller size tended to have high-risk parenchymal patterns. It is concluded that in Swedish women, and perhaps in Caucasian women in general, small breast size is associated with increasing breast risk through its association with high-risk parenchymal pattern. This is in contrast to the fact that Asian women, who in general have breasts of smaller size, have low prevalence of high-risk parenchymal pattern as well as low rates of breast cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8664807

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cancer Prev        ISSN: 0959-8278            Impact factor:   2.497


  12 in total

Review 1.  Mammographic density is not a worthwhile examination to distinguish high cancer risk women in screening.

Authors:  Catherine Colin; Anne-Marie Schott; Pierre-Jean Valette
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2014-06-28       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Laterality of breast cancer in the United States.

Authors:  H A Weiss; S S Devesa; L A Brinton
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 2.506

3.  Large-scale genotyping identifies a new locus at 22q13.2 associated with female breast size.

Authors:  Jingmei Li; Jia Nee Foo; Nils Schoof; Jajini S Varghese; Pablo Fernandez-Navarro; Gretchen L Gierach; Swee Tian Quek; Mikael Hartman; Silje Nord; Vessela N Kristensen; Marina Pollán; Jonine D Figueroa; Deborah J Thompson; Yi Li; Chiea Chuen Khor; Keith Humphreys; Jianjun Liu; Kamila Czene; Per Hall
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  2013-07-03       Impact factor: 6.318

4.  Breast cancer in Chinese women younger than age 40: are they different from their older counterparts?

Authors:  Ava Kwong; Polly Cheung; Stephanie Chan; Silvia Lau
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 3.352

5.  High-risk mammographic parenchymal patterns and anthropometric measures: a case-control study.

Authors:  E Sala; R Warren; J McCann; S Duffy; R Luben; N Day
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 7.640

6.  Non-randomness of the anatomical distribution of tumors.

Authors:  Clare Yu; James Kameron Mitchell
Journal:  Cancer Converg       Date:  2017-12-19

Review 7.  An overview of mammographic density and its association with breast cancer.

Authors:  Shayan Shaghayeq Nazari; Pinku Mukherjee
Journal:  Breast Cancer       Date:  2018-04-12       Impact factor: 4.239

8.  Insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF1) genotype predicts breast volume after pregnancy and hormonal contraception and is associated with circulating IGF-1 levels: implications for risk of early-onset breast cancer in young women from hereditary breast cancer families.

Authors:  H Jernström; T Sandberg; E Bågeman; A Borg; H Olsson
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2005-03-14       Impact factor: 7.640

9.  Tracking nonpalpable breast cancer for breast-conserving surgery with carbon nanoparticles: implication in tumor location and lymph node dissection.

Authors:  Yanyan Jiang; Nan Lin; Sheng Huang; Chongping Lin; Na Jin; Zaizhong Zhang; Jun Ke; Yinghao Yu; Jianping Zhu; Yu Wang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 1.889

10.  Stage of breast cancer at diagnosis among women with cosmetic breast implants.

Authors:  L R Hölmich; L Mellemkjaer; K A Gunnarsdóttir; U B Tange; C Krag; S Møller; J K McLaughlin; J H Olsen
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2003-03-24       Impact factor: 7.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.