Literature DB >> 10573274

Live-birth rates and multiple-birth risk using in vitro fertilization.

L A Schieve1, H B Peterson, S F Meikle, G Jeng, I Danel, N M Burnett, L S Wilcox.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: To maximize birth rates, physicians who perform in vitro fertilization (IVF) often transfer multiple embryos, but this increases the multiple-birth risk. Live-birth and multiple-birth rates may vary by patient age and embryo quality. One marker for embryo quality is cryopreservation of extra embryos (if embryos are set aside for cryopreservation, higher quality embryos may have been available for transfer).
OBJECTIVE: To examine associations between the number of embryos transferred during IVF and live-birth and multiple-birth rates stratified by maternal age and whether extra embryos were available (ie, extra embryos cryopreserved). DESIGN AND
SETTING: Retrospective cohort of 300 US clinics reporting IVF transfer procedures to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in 1996.
SUBJECTS: A total of 35554 IVF transfer procedures. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Live-birth and multiple-birth rates (percentage of live births that were multiple).
RESULTS: A total number of 9873 live births were reported (multiple births from 1 pregnancy were counted as 1 live birth). The number of embryos needed to achieve maximum live- birth rates varied by age and whether extra embryos were cryopreserved. Among women 20 to 29 years and 30 to 34 years of age, maximum live-birth rates (43 % and 36%, respectively) were achieved when 2 embryos were transferred and extra embryos were cryopreserved. Among women 35 years of age and older, live-birth rates were lower overall and regardless of whether embryos were cryopreserved, live-birth rates increased if more than 2 embryos were transferred. Multiple-birth rates varied by age and the number of embryos transferred, but not by whether embryos were cryopreserved. With 2 embryos transferred, multiple-birth rates were 22.7%, 19.7%, 11.6%, and 10.8% for women aged 20 to 29, 30 to 34, 35 to 39, and 40 to 44 years, respectively. Multiple-birth rates increased as high as 45.7% for women aged 20 to 29 years and 39.8% for women aged 30 to 34 years if 3 embryos were transferred. Among women aged 35 to 39 years, the multiple-birth rate was 29.4% if 3 embryos were transferred. Among women 40 to 44 years of age, the multiple-birth rate was less than 25% even if 5 embryos were transferred.
CONCLUSIONS: Based on these data, the risk of multiple births from IVF varies by maternal age and number of embryos transferred. Embryo quality was not related to multiple birth risk but was associated with increased live-birth rates when fewer embryos were transferred.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Empirical Approach; Genetics and Reproduction

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10573274     DOI: 10.1001/jama.282.19.1832

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  27 in total

1.  Reflections on the cost-effectiveness of recombinant FSH in assisted reproduction. The clinician's perspective.

Authors:  J Balasch; P N Barri
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  The added value of embryo cryopreservation to cumulative ongoing pregnancy rates per IVF treatment: is cryopreservation worth the effort?

Authors:  D de Jong; M J C Eijkemans; N G M Beckers; R V Pruijsten; B C J M Fauser; N S Macklon
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 3.412

3.  Elective transfer of two embryos: reduction of multiple gestations while maintaining high pregnancy rates.

Authors:  Donna Dowling-Lacey; Estella Jones; Jacob Mayer; Silvina Bocca; Laurel Stadtmauer; Sergio Oehninger
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2006-12-22       Impact factor: 3.412

4.  Mortality among twins born to unmarried teenagers in the United States.

Authors:  Hamisu M Salihu; Caroline K Mbuba; Olatunji J Oluwatade; Muktar H Aliyu
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2005-09

5.  Ethical dimensions of the number of embryos to be transferred in in vitro fertilization.

Authors:  F A Chervenak; L B McCullough; Z Rosenwaks
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 6.  IVF/ICSI with or without preimplantation genetic screening for aneuploidy in couples without genetic disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Miguel A Checa; Pablo Alonso-Coello; Ivan Solà; Ana Robles; Ramón Carreras; Juan Balasch
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2009-07-24       Impact factor: 3.412

7.  The effect on pregnancy and multiples of transferring 1-3 embryos in women at least 40 years old.

Authors:  Nouf M Alasmari; Weon-Young Son; Michael H Dahan
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2016-06-01       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 8.  Microfluidics for sperm analysis and selection.

Authors:  Reza Nosrati; Percival J Graham; Biao Zhang; Jason Riordon; Alexander Lagunov; Thomas G Hannam; Carlos Escobedo; Keith Jarvi; David Sinton
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2017-10-31       Impact factor: 14.432

9.  Clinical outcome of frozen blastocyst transfer; single vs. double transfer.

Authors:  Atsushi Yanaihara; Takeshi Yorimitsu; Hiroshi Motoyama; Motohiro Ohara; Toshihiro Kawamura
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2008-11-07       Impact factor: 3.412

10.  Factors associated with the use of elective single-embryo transfer and pregnancy outcomes in the United States, 2004-2012.

Authors:  Aaron K Styer; Barbara Luke; Wendy Vitek; Mindy S Christianson; Valerie L Baker; Alicia Y Christy; Alex J Polotsky
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2016-03-18       Impact factor: 7.329

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.