Literature DB >> 23519383

Exogenous attention can be counter-selective: onset cues disrupt sensitivity to color changes.

Gisela Müller-Plath1, Nils Klöckner.   

Abstract

In peripheral spatial cueing paradigms, exogenous attentional capture is commonly observed after salient onset cues or with cues contingent on target characteristics. We proposed that exogenously captured attention disrupts the selectivity to target features. We tested this by experimentally emulating the everyday observation that in a viewing situation in which the observer is monitoring a stationary display fort change to occur, the onset of a salient stimulus (onset cue) or a change in a stationary stimulus similar to the expected one (contingent cue) has a distracting effect. As predicted, we found that both types of cues reduced the target detection sensitivity but enhanced the bias to respond in a go-nogo-paradigm. With the onset cue, the sensitivity loss was more pronounced at the side of the cue, whereas the contingent cue affected both sides likewise. Moreover, the effects of the onset cue interacted with the task difficulty: the more selectivity a task required the more immune it was against disruption, but the more likely was a response. We concluded that onset capture disrupts selective attention by adding noise to the processing of the target location. The effects of contingent capture could be explained with cue-target confounding. Finally, we suggest a new model of attentional capture in which exogenous and endogenous components interact in a dynamic way.

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23519383     DOI: 10.1007/s00426-013-0489-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Res        ISSN: 0340-0727


  61 in total

1.  Top-down contingencies in peripheral cuing: The roles of color and location.

Authors:  Ulrich Ansorge; Manfred Heumann
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  The peculiar nature of simultaneous colour contrast in uniform surrounds.

Authors:  Vebjørn Ekroll; Franz Faul; Reinhard Niederée
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  Greater disruption due to failure of inhibitory control on an ambiguous distractor.

Authors:  Yoshiaki Tsushima; Yuka Sasaki; Takeo Watanabe
Journal:  Science       Date:  2006-12-15       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Cross-dimensional perceptual selectivity.

Authors:  J Theeuwes
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1991-08

5.  Peripheral visual changes and spatial attention.

Authors:  A Lambert; M Spencer; R Hockey
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  1991-04

6.  Abrupt onsets capture attention independent of top-down control settings.

Authors:  Daniel Schreij; Calebn Owens; Jan Theeuwes
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2008-02

7.  Variations in size of the visual field in which targets are presented: an attentional range effect.

Authors:  D LaBerge; V Brown
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1986-09

8.  Sensitivity and criterion effects in the spatial cuing of visual attention.

Authors:  H J Müller; J M Findlay
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1987-10

9.  Zoom-out attentional impairment in children with autism spectrum disorder.

Authors:  Luca Ronconi; Simone Gori; Milena Ruffino; Massimo Molteni; Andrea Facoetti
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2012-03-19       Impact factor: 4.027

10.  Transient attention enhances perceptual performance and FMRI response in human visual cortex.

Authors:  Taosheng Liu; Franco Pestilli; Marisa Carrasco
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2005-02-03       Impact factor: 17.173

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.