Literature DB >> 15576709

Models of the medical consultation: opportunities and limitations of a game theory perspective.

C Tarrant1, T Stokes, A M Colman.   

Abstract

The medical consultation is best understood as a two-way social interaction involving interactive decision making. Game theory--a theory based on assumptions of rational choice and focusing on interactive decision making--has the potential to provide models of the consultation that can be used to generate empirically testable predictions about the factors that promote quality of care. Three different game structures--the Prisoner's Dilemma game, the Assurance game, and the Centipede game--all provide insights into the possible underlying dynamics of the doctor-patient interaction. Further empirical work is needed to uncover the underlying game structures that occur most commonly in medical consultations. Game theory has the potential to provide a new conceptual and theoretical basis for future empirical work on the interaction between doctors and their patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15576709      PMCID: PMC1743922          DOI: 10.1136/qhc.13.6.461

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care        ISSN: 1475-3898


  11 in total

1.  Altruistic punishment in humans.

Authors:  Ernst Fehr; Simon Gächter
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-01-10       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Shared decision-making in the medical encounter: what does it mean? (or it takes at least two to tango).

Authors:  C Charles; A Gafni; T Whelan
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 4.634

3.  [Physician-patient relationship: an assessment based on the theory of game].

Authors:  P Batifoulier
Journal:  Cah Sociol Demogr Med       Date:  1997 Jul-Dec

4.  Sequential games and medical diagnosis.

Authors:  D J Hockstra; S D Miller
Journal:  Comput Biomed Res       Date:  1976-06

5.  Shared decision-making in primary care: the neglected second half of the consultation.

Authors:  G Elwyn; A Edwards; P Kinnersley
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 5.386

6.  Doctor-patient communication about drugs: the evidence for shared decision making.

Authors:  F A Stevenson; C A Barry; N Britten; N Barber; C P Bradley
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 4.634

7.  Playing doctor: application of game theory to medical decision-making.

Authors:  G A Diamond; A Rozanski; M Steuer
Journal:  J Chronic Dis       Date:  1986

8.  Five years of heartsink patients in general practice.

Authors:  T C O'Dowd
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1988 Aug 20-27

Review 9.  Cooperation, psychological game theory, and limitations of rationality in social interaction.

Authors:  Andrew M Colman
Journal:  Behav Brain Sci       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 12.579

Review 10.  Towards a theory of continuity of care.

Authors:  Denis Pereira Gray; Philip Evans; Kieran Sweeney; Pamela Lings; David Seamark; Clare Seamark; Michael Dixon; Nicholas Bradley
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 18.000

View more
  12 in total

1.  Idealistic, impractical, impossible? Shared decision making in the real world.

Authors:  Glyn Elwyn
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 5.386

2.  Medicines concordance and game theory.

Authors:  Dyfrig Hughes
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2008-07-11       Impact factor: 4.335

3.  Continuity and trust in primary care: a qualitative study informed by game theory.

Authors:  Carolyn Tarrant; Mary Dixon-Woods; Andrew M Colman; Tim Stokes
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2010 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.166

4.  Physician trust in the patient: development and validation of a new measure.

Authors:  David H Thom; Sabrina T Wong; David Guzman; Amery Wu; Joanne Penko; Christine Miaskowski; Margot Kushel
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2011 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.166

5.  Past experience, 'shadow of the future', and patient trust: a cross-sectional survey.

Authors:  Carolyn Tarrant; Andrew M Colman; Tim Stokes
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 5.386

6.  When is it rational to participate in a clinical trial? A game theory approach incorporating trust, regret and guilt.

Authors:  Benjamin Djulbegovic; Iztok Hozo
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2012-06-22       Impact factor: 4.615

7.  Tripartite Data Analysis for Optimizing Telemedicine Operations: Evidence from Guizhou Province in China.

Authors:  Jinna Yu; Tingting Zhang; Zhen Liu; Assem Abu Hatab; Jing Lan
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-01-06       Impact factor: 3.390

8.  Evolutionary game theory: lessons and limitations, a cancer perspective.

Authors:  J W McEvoy
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2009-11-17       Impact factor: 7.640

9.  The social paediatrics initiative: a RICHER model of primary health care for at risk children and their families.

Authors:  Sabrina T Wong; M Judith Lynam; Koushambhi B Khan; Lorine Scott; Christine Loock
Journal:  BMC Pediatr       Date:  2012-10-04       Impact factor: 2.125

10.  Simulation of avascular tumor growth by agent-based game model involving phenotype-phenotype interactions.

Authors:  Yong Chen; Hengtong Wang; Jiangang Zhang; Ke Chen; Yumin Li
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-12-09       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.