Literature DB >> 10562582

Wheat bran affects the site of fermentation of resistant starch and luminal indexes related to colon cancer risk: a study in pigs.

M J Govers1, N J Gannon, F R Dunshea, P R Gibson, J G Muir.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Recent studies suggest that resistant starch (effective in producing butyrate and lowering possibly toxic ammonia) is rapidly fermented in the proximal colon; the distal colon especially would, however, benefit from these properties of resistant starch. AIMS: To determine whether wheat bran (a rich source of insoluble non-starch polysaccharides), known to hasten gastrointestinal transit, could carry resistant starch through to the distal colon and thus shift its site of fermentation.
METHODS: Twenty four pigs were fed four human type diets: a control diet, or control diet supplemented with resistant starch, wheat bran, or both. Intestinal contents and faeces were collected after two weeks.
RESULTS: Without wheat bran, resistant starch was rapidly fermented in the caecum and proximal colon. Supplementation with wheat bran inhibited the caecal fermentation of resistant starch, resulting in an almost twofold increase (from 12.9 (2.5) to 20.5 (2.1) g/day, p<0.05) in resistant starch being fermented between the proximal colon and faeces. This resulted in higher butyrate (133%, p<0.05) and lower ammonia (81%, p<0.05) concentrations in the distal colonic regions.
CONCLUSIONS: Wheat bran can shift the fermentation of resistant starch further distally, thereby improving the luminal conditions in the distal colonic regions where tumours most commonly occur. Therefore, the combined consumption of resistant starch and insoluble non-starch polysaccharides may contribute to the dietary modulation of colon cancer risk.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10562582      PMCID: PMC1727739          DOI: 10.1136/gut.45.6.840

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gut        ISSN: 0017-5749            Impact factor:   23.059


  35 in total

1.  The effect of wheat bran on intestinal transit.

Authors:  D K Payler; E W Pomare; K W Heaton; R F Harvey
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1975-03       Impact factor: 23.059

2.  Effects of ammonium acetate and sodium cholate on N-methyl-N'-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine-induced colon carcinogenesis of rats.

Authors:  S K Clinton; D G Bostwick; L M Olson; H J Mangian; W J Visek
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1988-06-01       Impact factor: 12.701

3.  The pig as a model in dietary fibre digestion studies.

Authors:  H Graham; P Aman
Journal:  Scand J Gastroenterol Suppl       Date:  1987

4.  Increasing starch intake in the human diet increases fecal bulking.

Authors:  P S Shetty; A V Kurpad
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  1986-02       Impact factor: 7.045

5.  A high amylose (amylomaize) starch raises proximal large bowel starch and increases colon length in pigs.

Authors:  D L Topping; J M Gooden; I L Brown; D A Biebrick; L McGrath; R P Trimble; M Choct; R J Illman
Journal:  J Nutr       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 4.798

Review 6.  The pig as a model for human nutrition.

Authors:  E R Miller; D E Ullrey
Journal:  Annu Rev Nutr       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 11.848

7.  Validation of an in vitro assay for predicting the amount of starch that escapes digestion in the small intestine of humans.

Authors:  J G Muir; K O'Dea
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 7.045

8.  Physiological effects of fibre-rich types of bread. 2. Dietary fibre from bread: digestibility by the intestinal microflora and water-holding capacity in the colon of human subjects.

Authors:  W Van Dokkum; N A Pikaar; J T Thissen
Journal:  Br J Nutr       Date:  1983-07       Impact factor: 3.718

9.  Effect of resistant starch on fecal bulk and fermentation-dependent events in humans.

Authors:  J Phillips; J G Muir; A Birkett; Z X Lu; G P Jones; K O'Dea; G P Young
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 7.045

10.  Improved method for measurement of dietary fiber as non-starch polysaccharides in plant foods.

Authors:  H N Englyst; J H Cummings
Journal:  J Assoc Off Anal Chem       Date:  1988 Jul-Aug
View more
  29 in total

Review 1.  Probiotics and prebiotics in inflammatory bowel disease: microflora 'on the scope'.

Authors:  Dimitrios Damaskos; George Kolios
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2008-02-12       Impact factor: 4.335

2.  Impact of diet and individual variation on intestinal microbiota composition and fermentation products in obese men.

Authors:  Anne Salonen; Leo Lahti; Jarkko Salojärvi; Grietje Holtrop; Katri Korpela; Sylvia H Duncan; Priya Date; Freda Farquharson; Alexandra M Johnstone; Gerald E Lobley; Petra Louis; Harry J Flint; Willem M de Vos
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2014-04-24       Impact factor: 10.302

3.  Insoluble fiber and intestinal microbiota metabolism.

Authors:  Carol S Brotherton
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-02-05       Impact factor: 7.527

4.  Response to the letter by Brotherton regarding "insoluble fiber and intestinal microbiota metabolism".

Authors:  Jason R Goldsmith; R Balfour Sartor
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-02-07       Impact factor: 7.527

Review 5.  Dietary fibre in gastrointestinal health and disease.

Authors:  Samantha K Gill; Megan Rossi; Balazs Bajka; Kevin Whelan
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2020-11-18       Impact factor: 46.802

6.  Pigs Ferment Enzymatically Digestible Starch when it Is Substituted for Resistant Starch.

Authors:  Rik J J van Erp; Sonja de Vries; Theo A T G van Kempen; Walter J J Gerrits
Journal:  J Nutr       Date:  2019-08-01       Impact factor: 4.798

7.  The Association between Prebiotic Fiber Supplement Use and Colorectal Cancer Risk and Mortality in the Women's Health Initiative.

Authors:  Meghan B Skiba; Lindsay N Kohler; Tracy E Crane; Elizabeth T Jacobs; Aladdin H Shadyab; Ikuko Kato; Linda Snetselaar; Lihong Qi; Cynthia A Thomson
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2019-08-27       Impact factor: 4.254

8.  Modulation of colonic hydrogen sulfide production by diet and mesalazine utilizing a novel gas-profiling technology.

Authors:  Chu K Yao; Asaf Rotbart; Jian Z Ou; Kourosh Kalantar-Zadeh; Jane G Muir; Peter R Gibson
Journal:  Gut Microbes       Date:  2018-05-09

9.  Does the biomarker 15N-lactose ureide allow to estimate the site of fermentation of resistant starch?

Authors:  Lieselotte Cloetens; Vicky De Preter; Henriette De Loor; Paul Rutgeerts; Kristin Verbeke
Journal:  Eur J Nutr       Date:  2008-06-16       Impact factor: 5.614

10.  Innovations in food chemistry and processing to enhance the nutrient profile of the white potato in all forms.

Authors:  Eric A Decker; Mario G Ferruzzi
Journal:  Adv Nutr       Date:  2013-05-01       Impact factor: 8.701

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.