Literature DB >> 10562262

Cardiogenic shock in patients with acute ischemic syndromes with and without ST-segment elevation.

D R Holmes1, P B Berger, J S Hochman, C B Granger, T D Thompson, R M Califf, A Vahanian, E R Bates, E J Topol.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Cardiogenic shock is usually considered a sequela of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. There are limited prospective data on the incidence and significance of shock in non-ST-segment elevation patients. This study assessed the incidence and outcomes of cardiogenic shock developing after enrollment among patients with and without ST-segment elevation in the Global Use of Strategies To Open Occluded Coronary Arteries (GUSTO)-IIb trial. METHODS AND
RESULTS: Among 12,084 patients in GUSTO-IIb who did not present with cardiogenic shock, 4092 (34%) had and 7991 (66%) did not have ST-segment elevation on the enrollment ECG. Cardiogenic shock developed in 4.2% of ST-segment elevation patients compared with 2.5% of patients without ST-segment elevation (odds ratio, 0. 581; 95% CI, 0.472 to 0.715; P<0.001). Shock developed significantly later among patients without ST-segment elevation. There were significant differences in baseline characteristics between shock patients with and without ST-segment elevation: Patients without ST-segment elevation were older, more frequently had diabetes mellitus and 3-vessel disease, but had less TIMI grade 0 flow at angiography. Regardless of the initial ECG, mortality was high: 63% among patients with ST-segment elevation and 73% in those without ST-segment elevation.
CONCLUSIONS: Cardiogenic shock occurs in the setting of acute ischemic syndromes regardless of whether ST-segment elevation is present. The incidence, patient characteristics, timing, clinical course, and angiographic findings differ between the 2 groups. Mortality from cardiogenic shock is similarly high among patients with and without ST-segment elevation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10562262     DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.100.20.2067

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  25 in total

Review 1.  Management of cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Venu Menon; Judith S Hochman
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 5.994

2.  Admission glucose level and in-hospital outcomes in diabetic and non-diabetic patients with acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Artur Dziewierz; Dawid Giszterowicz; Zbigniew Siudak; Tomasz Rakowski; Jacek S Dubiel; Dariusz Dudek
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2010-05-11       Impact factor: 5.460

Review 3.  Routine invasive versus conservative management in non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes.

Authors:  Peter R Sinnaeve
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Transl Res       Date:  2011-11-01       Impact factor: 4.132

Review 4.  Revascularization Strategies for Non-ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction.

Authors:  Bennet George; Naoki Misumida; Khaled M Ziada
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2019-04-10       Impact factor: 2.931

5.  Predictive value of the baseline electrocardiogram ST-segment pattern in cardiogenic shock: Results from the CardShock Study.

Authors:  Tuija Javanainen; Heli Tolppanen; Johan Lassus; Markku S Nieminen; Alessandro Sionis; Jindrich Spinar; José Silva-Cardoso; Matias Greve Lindholm; Marek Banaszewski; Veli-Pekka Harjola; Raija Jurkko
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2018-05-30       Impact factor: 1.468

6.  QT dispersion as a predictor for arrhythmias in patients with acute ST elevation myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Fahad Aziz; Sujatha Doddi; Anshu Alok; Sudheer Penupolu; Vijayant Singh; Michael Benz; Mary Abed
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 7.  Public reporting of PCI outcomes: for better or for worse.

Authors:  Brian J Potter; Robert W Yeh; Duane S Pinto
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 8.  [Infarct-related cardiogenic shock : Prognosis and treatment].

Authors:  R Prondzinsky; H Lemm; A Geppert; M Buerke; M Russ; K Werdan
Journal:  Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed       Date:  2018-05-02       Impact factor: 0.840

9.  Gender differences in patients with acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock.

Authors:  Oliver Koeth; Ralf Zahn; Tobias Heer; Timm Bauer; Claus Juenger; Bärbel Klein; Anselm Kai Gitt; Jochen Senges; Uwe Zeymer
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2009-10-25       Impact factor: 5.460

10.  Percutaneous ventricular assist device placement during active cardiopulmonary resuscitation for severe refractory cardiogenic shock after acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Gary M Idelchik; Pranav Loyalka; Biswajit Kar
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  2007
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.