Literature DB >> 24893937

Public reporting of PCI outcomes: for better or for worse.

Brian J Potter1, Robert W Yeh, Duane S Pinto.   

Abstract

Public reporting of PCI outcomes has had a polarizing effect on the cardiology community. The potential benefits of public reporting are many, but a host of unintended consequences have likely mitigated the anticipated positive impact of current reporting systems. In this review, we discuss what the goals of public disclosure are, the limitations of current reporting systems and the resultant unintended consequences. We also offer a perspective on future directions with a view to ensuring the benefits of public reporting while minimizing the risk of unintended consequences.

Mesh：

Year:  2014        PMID： 24893937     DOI： 10.1007/s11886-014-0500-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep        ISSN： 1523-3782            Impact factor:   2.931


  38 in total

1.  Accuracy of risk-adjusted mortality rate as a measure of hospital quality of care.

Authors:  J W Thomas; T P Hofer
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 2.983

2.  The fine balance of quality and quantity: the time has come to define quality of PCI!

Authors:  Usman Baber; Roxana Mehran
Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2011-10-01       Impact factor: 2.692

3.  A validated prediction tool for initial survivors of in-hospital cardiac arrest.

Authors:  Paul S Chan; John A Spertus; Harlan M Krumholz; Robert A Berg; Yan Li; Comilla Sasson; Brahmajee K Nallamothu
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2012-06-25

4.  Comparison of clinical and administrative data sources for hospital coronary artery bypass graft surgery report cards.

Authors:  David M Shahian; Treacy Silverstein; Ann F Lovett; Robert E Wolf; Sharon-Lise T Normand
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2007-03-12       Impact factor: 29.690

5.  Public reporting and case selection for percutaneous coronary interventions: an analysis from two large multicenter percutaneous coronary intervention databases.

Authors:  Mauro Moscucci; Kim A Eagle; David Share; Dean Smith; Anthony C De Franco; Michael O'Donnell; Eva Kline-Rogers; Sandeep M Jani; David L Brown
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2005-06-07       Impact factor: 24.094

6.  Early revascularization in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock. SHOCK Investigators. Should We Emergently Revascularize Occluded Coronaries for Cardiogenic Shock.

Authors:  J S Hochman; L A Sleeper; J G Webb; T A Sanborn; H D White; J D Talley; C E Buller; A K Jacobs; J N Slater; J Col; S M McKinlay; T H LeJemtel
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1999-08-26       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 7.  The unintended consequences of quality improvement.

Authors:  Naomi S Bardach; Michael D Cabana
Journal:  Curr Opin Pediatr       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 2.856

Review 8.  The public health hazards of risk avoidance associated with public reporting of risk-adjusted outcomes in coronary intervention.

Authors:  Frederic S Resnic; Frederick G P Welt
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2009-03-10       Impact factor: 24.094

9.  Cause of death within 30 days of percutaneous coronary intervention in an era of mandatory outcome reporting.

Authors:  Bhuvnesh Aggarwal; Stephen G Ellis; A Michael Lincoff; Samir R Kapadia; Joseph Cacchione; Russell E Raymond; Leslie Cho; Christopher Bajzer; Ravi Nair; Irving Franco; Conrad Simpfendorfer; E Murat Tuzcu; Patrick L Whitlow; Mehdi H Shishehbor
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2013-05-09       Impact factor: 24.094

10.  ST-elevation myocardial infarction: which patients do quality assurance programs include?

Authors:  Alex R Campbell; Daniel Satran; David M Larson; Ivan J Chavez; Barbara T Unger; Barbara P Chacko; Christopher Kapsner; Timothy D Henry
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes       Date:  2009-10-06
View more
  4 in total

1.  A Survey of Interventional Cardiologists' Attitudes and Beliefs About Public Reporting of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.

Authors:  Daniel M Blumenthal; Linda R Valsdottir; Yuansong Zhao; Changyu Shen; Ajay J Kirtane; Duane S Pinto; Fred S Resnic; Karen E Joynt Maddox; Jason H Wasfy; Roxana Mehran; Ken Rosenfield; Robert W Yeh
Journal:  JAMA Cardiol       Date:  2018-07-01       Impact factor: 14.676

2.  2016 Revision of the SCAI position statement on public reporting.

Authors:  Lloyd W Klein; Kishore J Harjai; Fred Resnic; William S Weintraub; H Vernon Anderson; Robert W Yeh; Dmitriy N Feldman; Osvaldo S Gigliotti; Kenneth Rosenfeld; Peter Duffy
Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2016-11-10       Impact factor: 2.692

3.  The National Cardiovascular Data Registry Voluntary Public Reporting Program: An Interim Report From the NCDR Public Reporting Advisory Group.

Authors:  Gregory J Dehmer; Jonathan Jennings; Ruth A Madden; David J Malenka; Frederick A Masoudi; Charles R McKay; Debra L Ness; Sunil V Rao; Frederic S Resnic; Michael E Ring; John S Rumsfeld; Marc E Shelton; Michael C Simanowith; Lara E Slattery; William S Weintraub; Ann Lovett; Sharon-Lise Normand
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2015-11-18       Impact factor: 24.094

4.  Public reporting on cardiac electrophysiology procedures and outcomes: where are we now and where are we headed?

Authors:  Samuel M Kim; Jim W Cheung
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2018-06-30       Impact factor: 1.900
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.