Literature DB >> 18709345

[The Will Rogers phenomenon and its impact on imaging diagnostics].

W A Golder1.   

Abstract

The Will Rogers phenomenon is a possible cause of systematic distortions in the results of clinical studies, which can be produced if stage migration occurs during a disease. The term refers to the apparent paradox which is observed when an element is changed from one set to another and the average values of both sets are altered in the same way. The effect is due to the prerequisite that the numerical value of the element being moved is placed between the mean values of both groups. In medicine, this phenomenon is a consequence of the evolution of staging procedures and may be source of misleading statistics for survival in cancer. Both advanced pathological assessment and modern imaging techniques may be involved. The wrong conclusions are induced by comparing the effects of treatment in contemporary patient groups, which profit from extensive diagnostic procedures, to those of historical controls. Treatise informs about the history of the term and illustrates its effects by numerical examples and clinical data. Finally, a model computation based on current PET/CT figures is offered.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 18709345     DOI: 10.1007/s00117-008-1733-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiologe        ISSN: 0033-832X            Impact factor:   0.635


  26 in total

1.  The "Will Rogers effect" on stage grading.

Authors:  T Testa; M A Nahum; E Spinelli; E Carbone; G P Flocchini; G Motta
Journal:  Ann Ital Chir       Date:  1999 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 0.766

2.  Postoperative pathological examination of colorectal cancer.

Authors:  M Micev; M Cosic-Micev; V Todorovic
Journal:  Acta Chir Iugosl       Date:  2000

3.  Staging with PET and the "Will Rogers" effect: redefining prognosis and survival in patients with cancer.

Authors:  Sandip Basu; Abass Alavi
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 9.236

4.  Prostate cancer and the Will Rogers phenomenon.

Authors:  Peter C Albertsen; James A Hanley; George H Barrows; David F Penson; Pam D H Kowalczyk; M Melinda Sanders; Judith Fine
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2005-09-07       Impact factor: 13.506

5.  [The Will-Rogers phenomenon. Stage migration in bronchogenic carcinoma after applying certainty criteria].

Authors:  A López Encuentra; A Gómez De La Cámara; A Varela De Ugarte; N Mañes; N Llobregat
Journal:  Arch Bronconeumol       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 4.872

6.  Role for lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymph node biopsy in patients with thick (> or = 4 mm) primary melanoma.

Authors:  J E Gershenwald; P F Mansfield; J E Lee; M I Ross
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 5.344

7.  FDG-PET in staging lung cancer: how does it change the algorithm?

Authors:  A F T Verhagen; G P Bootsma; V C G Tjan-Heijnen; G J van der Wilt; A L Cox; M H J Brouwer; F H M Corstens; W J G Oyen
Journal:  Lung Cancer       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 5.705

8.  The impact of computed tomography on pretherapeutic staging in patients with laryngeal cancer: demonstration of the Will Rogers' phenomenon.

Authors:  Gretchen A Champion; Jay F Piccirillo
Journal:  Head Neck       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 3.147

9.  The Will Rogers phenomenon. Stage migration and new diagnostic techniques as a source of misleading statistics for survival in cancer.

Authors:  A R Feinstein; D M Sosin; C K Wells
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1985-06-20       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  Pretherapeutic staging of laryngeal carcinoma. Clinical findings, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging compared with histopathology.

Authors:  P Zbären; M Becker; H Läng
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1996-04-01       Impact factor: 6.860

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  [Systematic errors in clinical studies : A comprehensive survey].

Authors:  W A Golder
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 1.059

Review 2.  [Systematic errors in clinical studies : A comprehensive survey].

Authors:  W A Golder
Journal:  Z Rheumatol       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 1.372

3.  Variability in Current Trauma Systems and Outcomes.

Authors:  Adel Elkbuli; Brianna Dowd; Rudy Flores; Dessy Boneva; Mark McKenney
Journal:  J Emerg Trauma Shock       Date:  2020-09-18

4.  Using relative survival measures for cross-sectional and longitudinal benchmarks of countries, states, and districts: the BenchRelSurv- and BenchRelSurvPlot-macros.

Authors:  Christian O Jacke; Iris Reinhard; Ute S Albert
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2013-01-14       Impact factor: 3.295

5.  Recent Improvement in the Long-term Survival of Breast Cancer Patients by Age and Stage in Japan.

Authors:  Akiyo Yoshimura; Hidemi Ito; Yoshikazu Nishino; Masakazu Hattori; Tomohiro Matsuda; Isao Miyashiro; Tomio Nakayama; Hiroji Iwata; Keitaro Matsuo; Hideo Tanaka; Yuri Ito
Journal:  J Epidemiol       Date:  2018-02-24       Impact factor: 3.211

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.