Literature DB >> 10557865

The use of conjoint analysis to study patient satisfaction.

F W Markham1, J J Diamond, C L Hermansen.   

Abstract

Previous research has identified aspects of the outpatient interactions between patients and physicians that are important for patient satisfaction. In this study, conjoint analysis was used to determine the relative importance of these factors to patients. This study found the perceived skill of the physician to be the most important factor and waiting time in the office the least important. The use of conjoint analysis should help both patients and physicians to maximize patient satisfaction while minimizing costs as much as possible.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10557865     DOI: 10.1177/01632789922034365

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eval Health Prof        ISSN: 0163-2787            Impact factor:   2.651


  7 in total

1.  Developing and validating a model to predict the success of an IHCS implementation: the Readiness for Implementation Model.

Authors:  Kuang-Yi Wen; David H Gustafson; Robert P Hawkins; Patricia F Brennan; Susan Dinauer; Pauley R Johnson; Tracy Siegler
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2010 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.497

2.  Elderly patients' experiences using adaptive conjoint analysis software as a decision aid for osteoarthritis of the knee.

Authors:  Donna Rochon; Jan M Eberth; Liana Fraenkel; Robert J Volk; Simon N Whitney
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2012-09-20       Impact factor: 3.377

3.  What patients want from primary care consultations: a discrete choice experiment to identify patients' priorities.

Authors:  Sudeh Cheraghi-Sohi; Arne Risa Hole; Nicola Mead; Ruth McDonald; Diane Whalley; Peter Bower; Martin Roland
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2008 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.166

4.  Race, treatment preferences, and hospice enrollment: eligibility criteria may exclude patients with the greatest needs for care.

Authors:  Jessica Fishman; Peter O'Dwyer; Hien L Lu; Hope R Henderson; Hope Henderson; David A Asch; David J Casarett
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2009-02-01       Impact factor: 6.860

5.  The terrible choice: re-evaluating hospice eligibility criteria for cancer.

Authors:  David J Casarett; Jessica M Fishman; Hien L Lu; Peter J O'Dwyer; Frances K Barg; Mary D Naylor; David A Asch
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-12-29       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  The relative importance of perceived doctor's attitude on the decision to consult for symptomatic osteoarthritis: a choice-based conjoint analysis study.

Authors:  Domenica Coxon; Martin Frisher; Clare Jinks; Kelvin Jordan; Zoe Paskins; George Peat
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2015-10-26       Impact factor: 2.692

7.  Patients' experiences and preferences for primary care delivery: a focus group analysis.

Authors:  Patrícia Norwood; Isabel Correia; Paula Veiga; Verity Watson
Journal:  Prim Health Care Res Dev       Date:  2019-06-24       Impact factor: 1.458

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.