Literature DB >> 10555486

The influence of decision criteria upon remembering and knowing in recognition memory.

A Postma1.   

Abstract

One may recognise an item as 'old' on basis of a recollective experience or by a feeling of familiarity without specific recollection. The former is called a 'remember' judgement; the latter a 'know' judgement. It has been claimed that remember and know responses reflect qualitatively distinct components of recognition memory, and not just derive from gradual differences in perceived trace strength or subjective certainty (i.e. remember judgments include memories of which one is more confident). Nonetheless, the present study examined the possibility that the distinction does relate to decision criteria placed upon a single familiarity axis (see Donaldson, 1996; Hirshman & Master, 1997). To this purpose, two groups of subjects were compared: one, which was instructed to be very conservative in their old-new judgements, while the other group was stimulated to be very lenient instead. Remember hit rates increased with more lenient criteria, whereas know hit rates did not, but false alarm rates did. While remember sensitivity was equal in the two groups, know sensitivity was lower with liberal criteria. Also it correlated with overall response bias. This lends support to the possibility that subjects not only apply an old-new decision criterion, but also set a remember-know criterion, which is affected in a similar way by liberal versus conservative instructions.

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10555486     DOI: 10.1016/s0001-6918(99)00032-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)        ISSN: 0001-6918


  11 in total

1.  The effect of testing procedure on remember-know judgments.

Authors:  Laura L Eldridge; Stacey Sarfatti; Barbara J Knowlton
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2002-03

2.  The retrieval practice effect in associative recognition.

Authors:  Michael F Verde
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2004-12

3.  Associative interference in recognition memory: a dual-process account.

Authors:  Michael F Verde
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2004-12

4.  Recognition memory and introspective remember/know judgments: evidence for the influence of distractor plausibility on "remembering" and a caution about purportedly nonparametric measures.

Authors:  Aaron S Benjamin
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2005-03

5.  Interpreting the effects of response bias on remember-know judgments using signal detection and threshold models.

Authors:  Caren M Rotello; Neil A Macmillan; Jason L Hicks; Michael J Hautus
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2006-12

6.  Individual differences in shifting decision criterion: a recognition memory study.

Authors:  Elissa M Aminoff; David Clewett; Scott Freeman; Amy Frithsen; Christine Tipper; Arianne Johnson; Scott T Grafton; Michael B Miller
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2012-10

7.  They can take a hint: Older adults effectively integrate memory cues during recognition.

Authors:  Alex Konkel; Diana Selmeczy; Ian G Dobbins
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2015-12

8.  An ERP investigation into the strategic regulation of the fluency heuristic during recognition memory.

Authors:  Brian P Kurilla; Brian D Gonsalves
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2012-01-12       Impact factor: 3.252

9.  Ignoring memory hints: The stubborn influence of environmental cues on recognition memory.

Authors:  Diana Selmeczy; Ian G Dobbins
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2017-03-02       Impact factor: 3.051

10.  Recognition memory for pictorial material in subclinical depression.

Authors:  Cristina Ramponi; Fionnuala C Murphy; Andrew J Calder; Philip J Barnard
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  2010-08-21
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.