Literature DB >> 10555065

Sarcomere tension-stiffness relation during the tetanus rise in single frog muscle fibres.

M A Bagni1, G Cecchi, B Colombini, F Colomo.   

Abstract

The sarcomere stiffness was measured in single muscle fibres during the development of tetanic tension using a method insensitive to fibre inertia and viscosity. The stiffness was calculated by measuring the ratio between tension and sarcomere length during a period of fast sarcomere elongation at constant velocity. Tension changes were corrected for force truncation by the quick recovery mechanism. The results show that the relation between force and stiffness deviates from the direct proportionality less than previously reported. If the deviation is due to the presence of a linear myofilament compliance in series with the cross-bridges, our data suggest that myofilament compliance accounts for about 30% of the sarcomere compliance. This value is significantly smaller than 50-70% determined by X-ray diffraction measurements. These two different findings, however, may be reconciled by assuming that the myofilament compliance is non-linear increasing appropriately at low tension.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10555065     DOI: 10.1023/a:1005582324129

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Muscle Res Cell Motil        ISSN: 0142-4319            Impact factor:   2.698


  19 in total

1.  Tension and stiffness of frog muscle fibres at full filament overlap.

Authors:  M A Bagni; G Cecchi; F Colomo; C Poggesi
Journal:  J Muscle Res Cell Motil       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 2.698

2.  Actin compliance: are you pulling my chain?

Authors:  Y E Goldman; A F Huxley
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 4.033

3.  Theoretical considerations on myofibril stiffness.

Authors:  M Forcinito; M Epstein; W Herzog
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 4.033

4.  Tension responses to sudden length change in stimulated frog muscle fibres near slack length.

Authors:  L E Ford; A F Huxley; R M Simmons
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1977-07       Impact factor: 5.182

5.  The mechanical characteristics of the contractile machinery at different levels of activation in intact single muscle fibres of the frog.

Authors:  M A Bagni; G Cecchi; F Colomo; C Tesi
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 2.622

6.  A model of force production that explains the lag between crossbridge attachment and force after electrical stimulation of striated muscle fibers.

Authors:  M A Bagni; G Cecchi; M Schoenberg
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1988-12       Impact factor: 4.033

7.  Stiffness and force in activated frog skeletal muscle fibers.

Authors:  G Cecchi; P J Griffiths; S Taylor
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1986-02       Impact factor: 4.033

8.  The relation between stiffness and filament overlap in stimulated frog muscle fibres.

Authors:  L E Ford; A F Huxley; R M Simmons
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1981-02       Impact factor: 5.182

9.  Tension transients during the rise of tetanic tension in frog muscle fibres.

Authors:  L E Ford; A F Huxley; R M Simmons
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1986-03       Impact factor: 5.182

10.  Force responses to fast ramp stretches in stimulated frog skeletal muscle fibres.

Authors:  M A Bagni; G Cecchi; E Cecchini; B Colombini; F Colomo
Journal:  J Muscle Res Cell Motil       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 2.698

View more
  16 in total

1.  Frequency-dependent distortion of meridional intensity changes during sinusoidal length oscillations of activated skeletal muscle.

Authors:  M A Bagni; B Colombini; H Amenitsch; S Bernstorff; C C Ashley; G Rapp; P J Griffiths
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 4.033

2.  A simple model with myofilament compliance predicts activation-dependent crossbridge kinetics in skinned skeletal fibers.

Authors:  D A Martyn; P B Chase; M Regnier; A M Gordon
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 4.033

3.  Significant impact on muscle mechanics of small nonlinearities in myofilament elasticity.

Authors:  Alf Månsson
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2010-09-22       Impact factor: 4.033

4.  Is the cross-bridge stiffness proportional to tension during muscle fiber activation?

Authors:  Barbara Colombini; Marta Nocella; M Angela Bagni; Peter J Griffiths; Giovanni Cecchi
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2010-06-02       Impact factor: 4.033

5.  Effects of solution tonicity on crossbridge properties and myosin lever arm disposition in intact frog muscle fibres.

Authors:  Barbara Colombini; Maria Angela Bagni; Giovanni Cecchi; Peter John Griffiths
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2006-10-05       Impact factor: 5.182

6.  Crossbridge properties during force enhancement by slow stretching in single intact frog muscle fibres.

Authors:  Barbara Colombini; Marta Nocella; Giulia Benelli; Giovanni Cecchi; Maria Angela Bagni
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2007-10-11       Impact factor: 5.182

7.  Mechanism of force enhancement during stretching of skeletal muscle fibres investigated by high time-resolved stiffness measurements.

Authors:  Marta Nocella; Maria Angela Bagni; Giovanni Cecchi; Barbara Colombini
Journal:  J Muscle Res Cell Motil       Date:  2013-01-08       Impact factor: 2.698

Review 8.  Stiffness, working stroke, and force of single-myosin molecules in skeletal muscle: elucidation of these mechanical properties via nonlinear elasticity evaluation.

Authors:  Motoshi Kaya; Hideo Higuchi
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2013-05-18       Impact factor: 9.261

9.  Crossbridge properties investigated by fast ramp stretching of activated frog muscle fibres.

Authors:  M Angela Bagni; Giovanni Cecchi; Barbara Colombini
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2005-03-17       Impact factor: 5.182

Review 10.  Comparative biomechanics of thick filaments and thin filaments with functional consequences for muscle contraction.

Authors:  Mark S Miller; Bertrand C W Tanner; Lori R Nyland; Jim O Vigoreaux
Journal:  J Biomed Biotechnol       Date:  2010-06-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.