Literature DB >> 23296372

Mechanism of force enhancement during stretching of skeletal muscle fibres investigated by high time-resolved stiffness measurements.

Marta Nocella1, Maria Angela Bagni, Giovanni Cecchi, Barbara Colombini.   

Abstract

Stretching of active muscles leads to a great enhancement of the force developed without increased ATP consumption. The mechanism of force enhancement is still debated and it is not clear if it is due to increased crossbridge strain or to a stretch-induced increase in crossbridge number. The present study, performed on single fibres from tibialis anterior or interosseus muscles of the frog at 5 °C, was aimed at clarifying this point. A striation follower device was used to measure sarcomere length changes. Force was measured during the application of stretches (0.15-3.9 ms duration, 3-7.8 nm per half-sarcomere amplitude) to activated fibres. Small 4 kHz sinusoidal length oscillations, superimposed on the stretches, were used to calculate fibre stiffness with high time resolution. Stiffness increased during the stretch then subsequently decayed, all in parallel with tension. Likewise, during quick releases, stiffness decreased during the release then subsequently recovered in parallel with tension. Comparison of tension and stiffness both during the tetanus rise and also during stretches which doubled tension, imposed on the tetanus rise, indicated that stretch-induced crossbridge recruitment was only about 11 %, suggesting that force enhancement by stretching is mainly due to an increase of individual crossbridge force, whereas crossbridge recruitment plays only a minor role. The accompanying stiffness changes can be explained by non-linearity of myofilament compliance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23296372     DOI: 10.1007/s10974-012-9335-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Muscle Res Cell Motil        ISSN: 0142-4319            Impact factor:   2.698


  43 in total

1.  Energy storage during stretch of active single fibres from frog skeletal muscle.

Authors:  Marco Linari; R C Woledge; N A Curtin
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2003-02-21       Impact factor: 5.182

2.  Non-crossbridge calcium-dependent stiffness in slow and fast skeletal fibres from mouse muscle.

Authors:  Marta Nocella; Barbara Colombini; Maria Angela Bagni; Joseph Bruton; Giovanni Cecchi
Journal:  J Muscle Res Cell Motil       Date:  2011-11-10       Impact factor: 2.698

3.  Non-linear myofilament elasticity in frog intact muscle fibres.

Authors:  K A P Edman
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 3.312

4.  Tension responses to sudden length change in stimulated frog muscle fibres near slack length.

Authors:  L E Ford; A F Huxley; R M Simmons
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1977-07       Impact factor: 5.182

5.  Tension changes during and after stretch in frog muscle fibres.

Authors:  H Sugi
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1972-08       Impact factor: 5.182

6.  Nonlinear elasticity and an 8-nm working stroke of single myosin molecules in myofilaments.

Authors:  Motoshi Kaya; Hideo Higuchi
Journal:  Science       Date:  2010-08-06       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Enhancement of mechanical performance by stretch during tetanic contractions of vertebrate skeletal muscle fibres.

Authors:  K A Edman; G Elzinga; M I Noble
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1978-08       Impact factor: 5.182

8.  Variation of muscle stiffness with tension during tension transients and constant velocity shortening in the frog.

Authors:  F J Julian; D L Morgan
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1981       Impact factor: 5.182

9.  Force decline during fatigue is due to both a decrease in the force per individual cross-bridge and the number of cross-bridges.

Authors:  Marta Nocella; Barbara Colombini; Giulia Benelli; Giovanni Cecchi; M Angela Bagni; Joseph Bruton
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2011-05-03       Impact factor: 5.182

10.  A non-cross-bridge stiffness in activated frog muscle fibers.

Authors:  Maria A Bagni; Giovanni Cecchi; Barbara Colombini; Francesco Colomo
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 4.033

View more
  9 in total

1.  A cross-bridge cycle with two tension-generating steps simulates skeletal muscle mechanics.

Authors:  Gerald Offer; K W Ranatunga
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2013-08-20       Impact factor: 4.033

2.  Active shortening protects against stretch-induced force deficits in human skeletal muscle.

Authors:  Anjali L Saripalli; Kristoffer B Sugg; Christopher L Mendias; Susan V Brooks; Dennis R Claflin
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2017-02-23

3.  Reinterpretation of the Tension Response of Muscle to Stretches and Releases.

Authors:  Gerald Offer; K W Ranatunga
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2016-11-01       Impact factor: 4.033

4.  A re-interpretation of the rate of tension redevelopment (k(TR)) in active muscle.

Authors:  Li Wang; Masataka Kawai
Journal:  J Muscle Res Cell Motil       Date:  2013-10-27       Impact factor: 2.698

Review 5.  Poorly understood aspects of striated muscle contraction.

Authors:  Alf Månsson; Dilson Rassier; Georgios Tsiavaliaris
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-04-16       Impact factor: 3.411

6.  Blebbistatin Effects Expose Hidden Secrets in the Force-Generating Cycle of Actin and Myosin.

Authors:  Mohammad A Rahman; Marko Ušaj; Dilson E Rassier; Alf Månsson
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2018-07-17       Impact factor: 4.033

Review 7.  Do Actomyosin Single-Molecule Mechanics Data Predict Mechanics of Contracting Muscle?

Authors:  Alf Månsson; Marko Ušaj; Luisa Moretto; Dilson E Rassier
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2018-06-25       Impact factor: 5.923

8.  Effect of temperature on crossbridge force changes during fatigue and recovery in intact mouse muscle fibers.

Authors:  Marta Nocella; Giovanni Cecchi; Maria Angela Bagni; Barbara Colombini
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-10-17       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Nonlinear Actomyosin Elasticity in Muscle?

Authors:  Alf Månsson; Malin Persson; Nabil Shalabi; Dilson E Rassier
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2018-12-13       Impact factor: 4.033

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.