Literature DB >> 10550487

Theory and method in the quantitative analysis of "impulsive choice" behaviour: implications for psychopharmacology.

M Y Ho1, S Mobini, T J Chiang, C M Bradshaw, E Szabadi.   

Abstract

Impulsive choice refers to the selection of small immediate gains in preference to larger delayed gains, or the selection of large delayed penalties in preference to smaller immediate penalties. Current theoretical interpretations of impulsive choice are reviewed, and a synthesis of these ideas, the "multiplicative hyperbolic model of choice", is presented. The model assumes that the value of a positive reinforcer increases as a hyperbolic function of its size, and decreases as a hyperbolic function of its delay and the odds against its occurrence. Each hyperbolic function contains a single discounting parameter which quantifies the organism's sensitivity to the variable in question. The hyperbolic discounting functions combine multiplicatively to determine the overall value of the reinforcer. Equivalent functions are postulated to govern the (negative) value of aversive events, the net value of an outcome reflecting the algebraic sum of the positive and negative values. The model gives rise to a quantitative methodology for studying impulsive choice, based on a family of linear indifference (null) equations, which describe performance under conditions of indifference, when the values of the reinforcers are assumed to be equal. This methodology may be used to identify individual differences in sensitivity to the magnitude, delay and probability of reinforcement. The methodology is also suitable for the quantitative evaluation of the effects of some pharmacological interventions on discounting parameters. Recent psychopharmacological studies of impulsive choice are reviewed, and the utility of indifference equations for extending this work, and developing a quantitative psychopharmacology of impulsive choice is discussed.

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10550487     DOI: 10.1007/pl00005482

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)        ISSN: 0033-3158            Impact factor:   4.530


  77 in total

1.  Interneuronal frontohippocampal interactions in cats trained to choose on the basis of reinforcement quality.

Authors:  G Kh Merzhanova; E E Dolbakyan; V N Khokhlova
Journal:  Neurosci Behav Physiol       Date:  2004-07

2.  Contributions of the orbitofrontal cortex to impulsive choice: interactions with basal levels of impulsivity, dopamine signalling, and reward-related cues.

Authors:  Fiona D Zeeb; Stan B Floresco; Catharine A Winstanley
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2010-04-29       Impact factor: 4.530

3.  Effects of Group I metabotropic glutamate receptor antagonists on sensitivity to reinforcer magnitude and delayed reinforcement in a delay-discounting task in rats: Contribution of delay presentation order.

Authors:  Justin R Yates; Katherine K Rogers; Benjamin T Gunkel; Nicholas A Prior; Mallory N Hughes; Sara M Sharpe; Hunter L Campbell; Anthony B Johnson; Margaret G Keller; Kerry A Breitenstein; Hansen N Shults
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2017-01-12       Impact factor: 3.332

4.  Effects of clomipramine on self-control choice in Lewis and Fischer 344 rats.

Authors:  Karen G Anderson; William L Woolverton
Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav       Date:  2005-01-18       Impact factor: 3.533

5.  Encoding of time-discounted rewards in orbitofrontal cortex is independent of value representation.

Authors:  Matthew R Roesch; Adam R Taylor; Geoffrey Schoenbaum
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2006-08-17       Impact factor: 17.173

Review 6.  Toward an animal model of gambling: delay discounting and the allure of unpredictable outcomes.

Authors:  Gregory J Madden; Eric E Ewan; Carla H Lagorio
Journal:  J Gambl Stud       Date:  2006-12-15

7.  Previous cocaine exposure makes rats hypersensitive to both delay and reward magnitude.

Authors:  Matthew R Roesch; Yuji Takahashi; Nishan Gugsa; Gregory B Bissonette; Geoffrey Schoenbaum
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2007-01-03       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Effect of reinforcer magnitude on performance maintained by progressive-ratio schedules.

Authors:  J F Rickard; S Body; Z Zhang; C M Bradshaw; E Szabadi
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 2.468

Review 9.  Temporal memory averaging and post-encoding alterations in temporal expectation.

Authors:  Matthew S Matell; Alexandra M Henning
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2013-02-27       Impact factor: 1.777

10.  Discounting of monetary rewards that are both delayed and probabilistic: delay and probability combine multiplicatively, not additively.

Authors:  Ariana Vanderveldt; Leonard Green; Joel Myerson
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2014-06-16       Impact factor: 3.051

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.