Literature DB >> 10543013

Does spinal kyphotic deformity influence the biomechanical characteristics of the adjacent motion segments? An in vivo animal model.

I Oda1, B W Cunningham, R A Buckley, M J Goebel, C J Haggerty, C M Orbegoso, P C McAfee.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: In an in vivo sheep model, the effects of spinal fusion and kyphotic deformity on the neighboring motion segments were analyzed.
OBJECTIVES: To investigate the effects of spinal fusion and kyphotic deformity on the adjacent motion segment. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The in vivo effects of kyphotic deformity on the neighboring motion segments have not been investigated in any studies.
METHODS: Eighteen sheep were equally randomized into three groups based on surgical procedure: L3-L5 in situ posterolateral fusion (n = 6) L3-L5 kyphotic posterolateral fusion (n = 6), and surgical exposure alone (n = 6). After a 16-week survival period, the adjacent motion segment changes were analyzed radiographically, biomechanically, and histologically.
RESULTS: The kyphosis group showed 5.0 degrees +/- 2.6 degrees and 1.7 degrees +/- 1.8 degrees compensatory hyperlordosis at L2-L3 and L5-L6, respectively, compared with surgical exposure and in situ posterolateral fusion, the kyphotic posterolateral fusion significantly influenced cranial adjacent motion segment biomechanics by inducing more stiffness in the posterior ligamentous complex (P < 0.05) and increasing lamina strain under flexion-extension loading (P < 0.05). Results of histologic analysis showed significant degenerative changes of the L2-L3 facet joints in the kyphosis group.
CONCLUSIONS: It is inferred that in the kyphosis group, compensatory hyperlordosis at the cranial adjacent level leads to lordotic contracture of the posterior ligamentous complex. The increased lamina strain, exhibited by the in situ group under flexion-extension, was further increased in the kyphosis group, indicating higher load transmission through the posterior column. Significant degenerative changes of the cephalad adjacent facet joints observed in the kyphosis group served to corroborate the biomechanical data. These results indicate that a kyphotic deformity may lead to facet joint contracture and facet arthritis and may serve as the origin of low back pain at the cranial adjacent level.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10543013     DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199910150-00014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  37 in total

Review 1.  [Multiplan correction of a 3D deformity. Options and relevance of optimizing the thoracic kyphosis in reconstructive scoliosis surgery].

Authors:  B Wiedenhöfer; C H Fürstenberg; K Schröder; M Akbar
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 1.087

2.  A prospective randomised study on the long-term effect of lumbar fusion on adjacent disc degeneration.

Authors:  Per Ekman; Hans Möller; Adel Shalabi; Yiang Xiao Yu; Rune Hedlund
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-04-01       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Risk factors for adjacent segment disease development after lumbar fusion.

Authors:  Sergei Masevnin; Dmitry Ptashnikov; Dmitry Michaylov; Hao Meng; Oleg Smekalenkov; Nikita Zaborovskii
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2015-04-15

4.  Correlative analyses of isolated upper lumbar disc herniation and adjacent wedge-shaped vertebrae.

Authors:  Jia-Xin Xu; Si-Dong Yang; Bao-Lin Wang; Da-Long Yang; Wen-Yuan Ding; Yong Shen
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-01-15

5.  Relative Contribution of Upper and Lower Lumbar Spinal Segments to Flexion/Extension: Comparison between Normal Spines and Spines with Disc Disease in Asian Patients.

Authors:  Tarun Bali; Malhar N Kumar
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2015-09-22

6.  Relationship between sagittal balance and adjacent segment disease in surgical treatment of degenerative lumbar spine disease: meta-analysis and implications for choice of fusion technique.

Authors:  Kevin Phan; Alexander Nazareth; Awais K Hussain; Adam A Dmytriw; Mithun Nambiar; Damian Nguyen; Jack Kerferd; Steven Phan; Chet Sutterlin; Samuel K Cho; Ralph J Mobbs
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-05-28       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 7.  [Dynamic instrumentation of the lumbar spine. Clinical and biomechanical analysis of success factors].

Authors:  Y P Charles; A Walter; S Schuller; J-P Steib
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 1.087

8.  Lumbar disc degeneration below a long arthrodesis (performed for scoliosis in adults) to L4 or L5.

Authors:  Ian J Harding; Sebastian Charosky; Raphael Vialle; Daniel H Chopin
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2007-11-08       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  Radiographic results of single level transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in degenerative lumbar spine disease: focusing on changes of segmental lordosis in fusion segment.

Authors:  Sang-Bum Kim; Taek-Soo Jeon; Youn-Moo Heo; Woo-Suk Lee; Jin-Woong Yi; Tae-Kyun Kim; Cheol-Mog Hwang
Journal:  Clin Orthop Surg       Date:  2009-11-25

10.  Long-term investigation of nonsurgical treatment for thoracolumbar and lumbar burst fractures: an outcome analysis in sight of spinopelvic balance.

Authors:  Heiko Koller; Frank Acosta; Axel Hempfing; David Rohrmüller; Mark Tauber; Stefan Lederer; Herbert Resch; Juliane Zenner; Helmut Klampfer; Robert Schwaiger; Robert Bogner; Wolfgang Hitzl
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2008-06-25       Impact factor: 3.134

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.