Literature DB >> 10533435

Successful design and development of genetically engineered Saccharomyces yeasts for effective cofermentation of glucose and xylose from cellulosic biomass to fuel ethanol.

N W Ho1, Z Chen, A P Brainard, M Sedlak.   

Abstract

Ethanol is an effective, environmentally friendly, nonfossil, transportation biofuel that produces far less pollution than gasoline. Furthermore, ethanol can be produced from plentiful, domestically available, renewable, cellulosic biomass. However, cellulosic biomass contains two major sugars, glucose and xylose, and a major obstacle in this process is that Saccharomyces yeasts, traditionally used and still the only microorganisms currently used for large scale industrial production of ethanol from glucose, are unable to ferment xylose to ethanol. This makes the use of these safest, most effective Saccharomyces yeasts for conversion of biomass to ethanol economically unfeasible. Since 1980, scientists worldwide have actively been trying to develop genetically engineered Saccharomyces yeasts to ferment xylose. In 1993, we achieved a historic breakthrough to succeed in the development of the first genetically engineered Saccharomyces yeasts that can effectively ferment both glucose and xylose to ethanol. This was accomplished by carefully redesigning the yeast metabolic pathway for fermenting xylose to ethanol, including cloning three xylose-metabolizing genes, modifying the genetic systems controlling gene expression, changing the dynamics of the carbon flow, etc. As a result, our recombinant yeasts not only can effectively ferment both glucose and xylose to ethanol when these sugars are present separately in the medium, but also can effectively coferment both glucose and xylose present in the same medium simultaneously to ethanol. This has made it possible because we have genetically engineered the Saccharomyces yeasts as such that they are able to overcome some of the natural barrier present in all microorganisms, such as the synthesis of the xylose metabolizing enzymes not to be affected by the presence of glucose and by the absence of xylose in the medium. This first generation of genetically engineered glucose-xylose-cofermenting Saccharomyces yeasts relies on the presence of a high-copy-number 2 mu-based plasmid that contains the three cloned genetically modified xylose-metabolizing genes to provide the xylose-metabolizing capability. In 1995, we achieved another breakthrough by creating the super-stable genetically engineered glucose-xylose-cofermenting Saccharomyces yeasts which contain multiple copies of the same three xylose-metabolizing genes stably integrated on the yeast chromosome. This is another critical development which has made it possible for the genetically engineered yeasts to be effective for cofermenting glucose and xylose by continuous fermentation. It is widely believed that the successful development of the stable glucose-xylose-cofermenting Saccharomyces yeasts has made the biomass-to-ethanol technology a step much closer to commercialization. In this paper, we present an overview of our rationales and strategies as well as our methods and approaches that led to the ingenious design and successful development of our genetically engineered Saccharomyces yeasts for effective cofermentation of glucose and xylose to biofuel ethanol.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10533435     DOI: 10.1007/3-540-49194-5_7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Adv Biochem Eng Biotechnol        ISSN: 0724-6145            Impact factor:   2.635


  22 in total

Review 1.  Microbial cellulose utilization: fundamentals and biotechnology.

Authors:  Lee R Lynd; Paul J Weimer; Willem H van Zyl; Isak S Pretorius
Journal:  Microbiol Mol Biol Rev       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 11.056

Review 2.  Engineering for biofuels: exploiting innate microbial capacity or importing biosynthetic potential?

Authors:  Hal Alper; Gregory Stephanopoulos
Journal:  Nat Rev Microbiol       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 60.633

3.  Evolutionary engineering of Saccharomyces cerevisiae for anaerobic growth on xylose.

Authors:  Marco Sonderegger; Uwe Sauer
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  An improved method of xylose utilization by recombinant Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Tien-Yang Ma; Ting-Hsiang Lin; Teng-Chieh Hsu; Chiung-Fang Huang; Gia-Luen Guo; Wen-Song Hwang
Journal:  J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2012-06-28       Impact factor: 3.346

5.  Plate ethanol-screening assay for selection of the Pichia stipitis and Hansenula polymorpha yeast mutants with altered capability for xylose alcoholic fermentation.

Authors:  Dorota Grabek-Lejko; Olena B Ryabova; Bernadetta Oklejewicz; Andriy Y Voronovsky; Andriy A Sibirny
Journal:  J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2006-06-15       Impact factor: 3.346

6.  Xylulokinase overexpression in two strains of Saccharomyces cerevisiae also expressing xylose reductase and xylitol dehydrogenase and its effect on fermentation of xylose and lignocellulosic hydrolysate.

Authors:  B Johansson; C Christensson; T Hobley; B Hahn-Hägerdal
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 4.792

7.  Fermentable sugars by chemical hydrolysis of biomass.

Authors:  Joseph B Binder; Ronald T Raines
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-03-01       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Comparing the fermentation performance of Escherichia coli KO11, Saccharomyces cerevisiae 424A(LNH-ST) and Zymomonas mobilis AX101 for cellulosic ethanol production.

Authors:  Ming W Lau; Christa Gunawan; Venkatesh Balan; Bruce E Dale
Journal:  Biotechnol Biofuels       Date:  2010-05-27       Impact factor: 6.040

9.  Metabolic engineering of a phosphoketolase pathway for pentose catabolism in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Marco Sonderegger; Michael Schümperli; Uwe Sauer
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 4.792

10.  Metabolic engineering of a thermophilic bacterium to produce ethanol at high yield.

Authors:  A Joe Shaw; Kara K Podkaminer; Sunil G Desai; John S Bardsley; Stephen R Rogers; Philip G Thorne; David A Hogsett; Lee R Lynd
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-09-08       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.