Literature DB >> 10528023

Prostate-specific antigen testing of older men.

H B Carter1, P K Landis, E J Metter, L A Fleisher, J D Pearson.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Elevated serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels are predictive of a future diagnosis of prostate cancer. To test the hypothesis that older men with low PSA levels may require less intensive PSA testing because of a reduced prostate cancer detection rate, we evaluated the association between age, baseline PSA level, and prostate cancer detection.
METHODS: We conducted a prospective cohort study among participants in a study of aging who had serial PSA measurements taken from age 60 or 65 years until they either were diagnosed with prostate cancer (cancer case subjects) or reached the age of 75 years (subjects without prostate cancer). The time of cancer detection among cancer case subjects was defined as the measurement date on which a PSA level above 4.0 ng/mL was detected (i.e., PSA conversion). Cancer case subjects and subjects without prostate cancer were analyzed according to baseline PSA level and age.
RESULTS: All cancer case subjects in the 60-year-old cohort had baseline PSA levels above 0.5 ng/mL, and 14 of 15 cancer cases that would have been detected by a PSA conversion among the 65-year-old cohort were associated with baseline PSA levels of 1.1 ng/mL or more. If PSA testing were discontinued in men aged 65 years with PSA levels of 0.5 ng/mL or less, 100% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 78%-100%) of the cancers would still be detected by age 75 years; if PSA testing were discontinued in men aged 65 years who had PSA levels of 1.0 ng/mL or less, 94% (95% CI = 70%-100%) of the cancers would still be detected by age 75 years.
CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that a decrease in the intensity of screening among older men with low PSA values may not lead to an increase in undetected prostate cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10528023      PMCID: PMC3474977          DOI: 10.1093/jnci/91.20.1733

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst        ISSN: 0027-8874            Impact factor:   13.506


  8 in total

Review 1.  The TNM classification of prostate cancer.

Authors:  F H Schröder; P Hermanek; L Denis; W R Fair; M K Gospodarowicz; M Pavone-Macaluso
Journal:  Prostate Suppl       Date:  1992

2.  American Cancer Society guidelines for the early detection of prostate cancer: update, June 10, 1997.

Authors:  A von Eschenbach; R Ho; G P Murphy; M Cunningham; N Lins
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1997-11-01       Impact factor: 6.860

3.  Classification of prostatic carcinomas.

Authors:  D F Gleason
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Rep       Date:  1966-03

4.  Prostate-specific antigen after anatomic radical retropubic prostatectomy. Patterns of recurrence and cancer control.

Authors:  C R Pound; A W Partin; J I Epstein; P C Walsh
Journal:  Urol Clin North Am       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 2.241

5.  Longitudinal evaluation of prostate-specific antigen levels in men with and without prostate disease.

Authors:  H B Carter; J D Pearson; E J Metter; L J Brant; D W Chan; R Andres; J L Fozard; P C Walsh
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1992 Apr 22-29       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Competing risk analysis of men aged 55 to 74 years at diagnosis managed conservatively for clinically localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  P C Albertsen; J A Hanley; D F Gleason; M J Barry
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1998-09-16       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Stability of serum prostate-specific antigen determination across laboratory, assay, and storage time.

Authors:  S J Jacobsen; G G Klee; H Lilja; G L Wright; J E Oesterling
Journal:  Urology       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 2.649

8.  A prospective evaluation of plasma prostate-specific antigen for detection of prostatic cancer.

Authors:  P H Gann; C H Hennekens; M J Stampfer
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1995-01-25       Impact factor: 56.272

  8 in total
  3 in total

1.  Prostate-specific antigen testing. Should we recommend it?

Authors:  John Hickey
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 3.275

2.  Empirical estimates of the lead time distribution for prostate cancer based on two independent representative cohorts of men not subject to prostate-specific antigen screening.

Authors:  Caroline J Savage; Hans Lilja; Angel M Cronin; David Ulmert; Andrew J Vickers
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2010-04-20       Impact factor: 4.254

3.  Prostate cancer in elderly men.

Authors:  Anton Stangelberger; Matthias Waldert; Bob Djavan
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2008
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.