Literature DB >> 9749479

Competing risk analysis of men aged 55 to 74 years at diagnosis managed conservatively for clinically localized prostate cancer.

P C Albertsen1, J A Hanley, D F Gleason, M J Barry.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: The appropriate therapy for men with localized prostate cancer is uncertain. Until results of clinical trials are available, men and their physicians need guidance.
OBJECTIVE: To estimate survival based on a competing risk analysis stratified by age at diagnosis and histologic findings for men diagnosed as having clinically localized prostate cancer and who were managed conservatively.
DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study.
SETTING: Connecticut Tumor Registry. PATIENTS: A total of 767 men with localized prostate cancer diagnosed between 1971 and 1984, aged 55 to 74 years at diagnosis, either not treated or treated with immediate or delayed hormonal therapy, and followed up for 10 to 20 years after diagnosis. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Estimates of the probability of dying from prostate cancer or other competing hazards.
RESULTS: Men with tumors that have Gleason scores of 2 to 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8 to 10 face a 4% to 7%, 6% to 11%, 18% to 30%, 42% to 70%, and 60% to 87% chance, respectively, of dying from prostate cancer within 15 years of diagnosis depending on their age at diagnosis.
CONCLUSIONS: Men whose prostate biopsy specimens show Gleason score 2 to 4 disease face a minimal risk of death from prostate cancer within 15 years of diagnosis. Conversely, men whose biopsy specimens show Gleason score 7 to 10 disease face a high risk of death from prostate cancer when treated conservatively, even when cancer is diagnosed as late as age 74 years. Men with Gleason score 5 or 6 tumors face a modest risk of death from prostate cancer that increases slowly over at least 15 years of follow-up.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9749479     DOI: 10.1001/jama.280.11.975

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  109 in total

1.  The outcomes of outcomes and effectiveness research: impacts and lessons from the first decade.

Authors:  D Stryer; S Tunis; H Hubbard; C Clancy
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 2.  Update in internal medicine.

Authors:  F López-Jiménez; M Brito; Y W Aude; P Scheinberg; M Kaplan; D A Dixon; N Schneiderman; J F Trejo; L H López-Salazar; E J Ramírez-Barba; R Kalil; C Ortiz; J Goyos; A Buenaño; S Kottiech; G A Lamas
Journal:  Arch Med Res       Date:  2000 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.235

3.  Are Elderly Patients With Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer Overtreated? Exploring Heterogeneity in Survival Effects.

Authors:  Anirban Basu; John L Gore
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 2.983

4.  Radical prostatectomy as treatment for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Michael A S Jewett; Neil Fleshner; Lawrence H Klotz; Robert K Nam; John Trachtenberg
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2003-01-07       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 5.  [Functional results of various surgical techniques for radical prostatectomy].

Authors:  U Michl; M Graefen; J Noldus; T Eggert; H Huland
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 0.639

6.  [The significance of comorbidity and age in radical prostatectomy].

Authors:  M Wirth; M Fröhner
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 0.639

7.  Prostate cancer: No evidence for adjuvant chemotherapy in high-risk disease.

Authors:  Peter Albers
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2015-09-01       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 8.  Critical review of prostate cancer predictive tools.

Authors:  Shahrokh F Shariat; Michael W Kattan; Andrew J Vickers; Pierre I Karakiewicz; Peter T Scardino
Journal:  Future Oncol       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 3.404

9.  Prostate cancer in elderly men.

Authors:  Anton Stangelberger; Matthias Waldert; Bob Djavan
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2008

Review 10.  What is low-risk prostate cancer and what is its natural history?

Authors:  Helen O'Donnell; Chris Parker
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2008-06-21       Impact factor: 4.226

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.