Literature DB >> 10527972

Conventional in-vitro fertilization versus intracytoplasmic sperm injection in sibling oocytes from couples with tubal infertility and normozoospermic semen.

C Staessen1, M Camus, K Clasen, A De Vos, A Van Steirteghem.   

Abstract

An auto-controlled study was conducted in couples with tubal infertility and normozoospermic semen. The fertilization rates and embryonic development in sibling oocytes treated, using the same semen sample, either by conventional in-vitro fertilization (IVF) or intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) at the same time were compared. Sibling oocyte-cumulus complexes (OCC) of 56 different couples with tubal infertility and normozoospermic semen were randomly divided in order of retrieval into two groups inseminated either by conventional IVF or by ICSI. Of the retrieved OCC in the same cohort, 53.0 +/- 31.2 and 62.0 +/- 26.6% showed two distinct pronuclei after conventional IVF and ICSI respectively (not significant). Complete fertilization failure occurred after conventional IVF in 12.5% (7/56 couples). After ICSI, the comparable figure was 3.6% (2/56). The number of cases was too small to apply a statistical test to this difference. Total cleavage rates were quite similar: 86.7 +/- 28.0 and 90.1 +/- 21% of the zygotes developed into transferable embryos after IVF and ICSI respectively (not significant). Similarly, no difference in embryo quality was observed. Although injection and insemination of the oocytes were performed at the same time in the two groups, at 42 h post-insemination more embryos were at the four-cell stage after ICSI (P < 0.001) than after conventional IVF, where more embryos were still at the two-cell stage (P < 0.02). Embryo transfer was possible in all 56 couples, resulting in 16 positive serum human chorionic gonadotrophin tests (28.6% per embryo transfer), from which a clinical pregnancy resulted in 15 couples. The best embryos were selected for transfer independently of the insemination procedure, but preferably from the same origin. There appeared to be no difference in implantation potency of the embryos obtained with either technique after the non-randomized transfers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10527972     DOI: 10.1093/humrep/14.10.2474

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Reprod        ISSN: 0268-1161            Impact factor:   6.918


  21 in total

1.  Performing ICSI using an injection pipette with the smallest possible inner diameter and a long taper increases normal fertilization rate, decreases incidence of degeneration and tripronuclear zygotes, and enhances embryo development.

Authors:  Y Yavas; S Roberge; F Khamsi; P Shirazi; M W Endman; J C Wong
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  Conventional in vitro fertilization maybe yields more available embryos than intracytoplasmic sperm injection for patients with no indications for ICSI.

Authors:  Li Ming; Chen Yuan; Zhao Ping; Liu Ping; Qiao Jie
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-11-15

Review 3.  The role of aromatase inhibitors in ameliorating deleterious effects of ovarian stimulation on outcome of infertility treatment.

Authors:  Mohamed F M Mitwally; Robert F Casper; Michael P Diamond
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2005-10-04       Impact factor: 5.211

4.  Intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) in unexplained and stage I endometriosis-associated infertility after fertilization failure with in vitro fertilization (IVF).

Authors:  Anne K Omland; Sverre Bjercke; Gudvor Ertzeid; Peter Fedorcsák; Nan B Oldereid; Ritsa Storeng; Thomas Abyholm; Tom Tanbo
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2006-09-01       Impact factor: 3.412

5.  Should ICSI be recommended routinely in patients with four or fewer oocytes retrieved?

Authors:  Martha Luna; Catherine Bigelow; Marlena Duke; Jane Ruman; Benjamin Sandler; Lawrence Grunfeld; Alan B Copperman
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2011-07-27       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 6.  ALWAYS ICSI? A SWOT analysis.

Authors:  E Bosch; J J Espinós; F Fabregues; J Fontes; J García-Velasco; J Llácer; A Requena; M A Checa; J Bellver
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2020-06-24       Impact factor: 3.412

7.  Is intracytoplasmic sperm (ICSI) better than traditional in vitro fertilization (IVF): confirmation of higher blastocyst rates per oocyte using a split insemination design.

Authors:  May-Tal Sauerbrun-Cutler; Warren J Huber; Phinnara Has; Chloe Shen; Richard Hackett; Ruben Alvero; Shunping Wang
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2020-05-20       Impact factor: 3.412

8.  Comparison of embryo quality between intracytoplasmic sperm injection and in vitro fertilization in sibling oocytes.

Authors:  R Yoeli; R Orvieto; J Ashkenazi; M Shelef; Z Ben-Rafael; I Bar-Hava
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2008-01-19       Impact factor: 3.412

9.  Live birth rates using conventional in vitro fertilization compared to intracytoplasmic sperm injection in Bologna poor responders with a single oocyte retrieved.

Authors:  Ioannis A Sfontouris; Efstratios M Kolibianakis; George T Lainas; Ram Navaratnarajah; Basil C Tarlatzis; Trifon G Lainas
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2015-03-11       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 10.  Approaches to improve the diagnosis and management of infertility.

Authors:  P Devroey; B C J M Fauser; K Diedrich
Journal:  Hum Reprod Update       Date:  2009-04-20       Impact factor: 15.610

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.