OBJECTIVE: To assess the sustainable benefits of a professional, multidisciplinary training program for patients with rheumatoid arthritis. DESIGN: Two studies with different observation periods. Study I was a prospective, randomized trial for 1 year. Study II was a noncontrolled observation over 5 years. SETTING: The 9-day program for eight patient groups encompassed a multidisciplinary cooperation between rheumatologists, orthopedists, physicotherapists, psychologists and social workers. PATIENTS: Sixty-eight consecutive patients with rheumatoid arthritis participated in an arthritis training program either immediately after enrollment in the program or after 1 year. INTERVENTIONS: The program covered the following fields: pathogenesis of rheumatoid arthritis, drug therapy, physicotherapy, practical exercise in remedial gymnastics, use of joint protection devices, orthopedic perspectives, psychological counseling, dietetics, information about unproven cures and social assistance. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Clinical outcome was assessed by self-report questionnaires: (1) Stanford Health Assessment Questionnaire, (2) Freiburg Questionnaire of Coping with Illness, (3) Beck Depression Inventory, and (4) a 21-point scale to evaluate cognitive-behavioral and environmental impact. RESULTS: A significant and persistent improvement of all investigated parameters was demonstrated in the 1-year controlled trial. Between the end-point of the 1-year study and the 5-year evaluation, this improvement increased even more for functional status and coping with illness, whereas depression returned to baseline values. These effects were seen even without reinforcement of the training. CONCLUSION: A professional, multidisciplinary approach to educate patients with rheumatoid arthritis leads to a significant and sustained improvement of the clinical outcome and is an approach that should be established as a part of conventional therapy.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: To assess the sustainable benefits of a professional, multidisciplinary training program for patients with rheumatoid arthritis. DESIGN: Two studies with different observation periods. Study I was a prospective, randomized trial for 1 year. Study II was a noncontrolled observation over 5 years. SETTING: The 9-day program for eight patient groups encompassed a multidisciplinary cooperation between rheumatologists, orthopedists, physicotherapists, psychologists and social workers. PATIENTS: Sixty-eight consecutive patients with rheumatoid arthritis participated in an arthritis training program either immediately after enrollment in the program or after 1 year. INTERVENTIONS: The program covered the following fields: pathogenesis of rheumatoid arthritis, drug therapy, physicotherapy, practical exercise in remedial gymnastics, use of joint protection devices, orthopedic perspectives, psychological counseling, dietetics, information about unproven cures and social assistance. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Clinical outcome was assessed by self-report questionnaires: (1) Stanford Health Assessment Questionnaire, (2) Freiburg Questionnaire of Coping with Illness, (3) Beck Depression Inventory, and (4) a 21-point scale to evaluate cognitive-behavioral and environmental impact. RESULTS: A significant and persistent improvement of all investigated parameters was demonstrated in the 1-year controlled trial. Between the end-point of the 1-year study and the 5-year evaluation, this improvement increased even more for functional status and coping with illness, whereas depression returned to baseline values. These effects were seen even without reinforcement of the training. CONCLUSION: A professional, multidisciplinary approach to educate patients with rheumatoid arthritis leads to a significant and sustained improvement of the clinical outcome and is an approach that should be established as a part of conventional therapy.
Authors: Arthur J Barsky; David K Ahern; E John Orav; Yvonne Nestoriuc; Matthew H Liang; Ilana T Berman; Joshua R Kingsbury; Jennifer T Sy; Kathryn G Wilk Journal: Semin Arthritis Rheum Date: 2010-12 Impact factor: 5.532
Authors: Paul Tingey; Mohamed Khanafer; Kulraj Singh; Andy Thompson; Nicole Le Riche; Lillian Barra; Sara Haig; Gina Rohekar; Sherry Rohekar; Warren Nielson; Janet E Pope Journal: Rheumatol Int Date: 2014-02-09 Impact factor: 2.631
Authors: Montserrat Núñez; Esther Núñez; Carmen Yoldi; Llorenç Quintó; Ma Victoria Hernández; José Muñoz-Gómez Journal: Rheumatol Int Date: 2005-10-25 Impact factor: 2.631