Literature DB >> 10527016

Intravascular extraction of problematic or infected permanent pacemaker leads: 1994-1996. U.S. Extraction Database, MED Institute.

C L Byrd1, B L Wilkoff, C J Love, T D Sellers, K T Turk, R Reeves, R Young, B Crevey, S P Kutalek, R Freedman, R Friedman, J Trantham, M Watts, J Schutzman, J Oren, J Wilson, F Gold, N E Fearnot, H J Van Zandt.   

Abstract

Of the 400,000-500,000 permanent pacemaker leads implanted worldwide each year, around 10% may eventually fail or become infected, becoming potential candidates for removal. Intravascular techniques for removing problematic or infected leads evolved over a 5-year period (1989-1993). This article analyzes results from January 1994 through April 1996, a period during which techniques were fairly stable. Extraction of 3,540 leads from 2,338 patients was attempted at 226 centers. Indications were: infection (27%), nonfunctional or incompatible leads (25%), Accufix or Encore leads (46%), or other causes (2%). Patients were 64+/-17 years of age (range 5-96); 59% were men, 41% women. Leads were implanted 47+/-41 months (maximum 26 years), in the atrium (53%), ventricle (46%), or SVC (1%). Extraction was attempted via the implant vein using locking stylets and dilator sheaths, and/or transfemorally using snares, retrieval baskets, and sheaths. Complete removal was achieved for 93% of leads, partial for 5%, and 2% were not removed. Risk of incomplete or failed extraction increased with implant duration (P<0.0001), less experienced physicians (P<0.0001), ventricular leads (P<0.005), noninfected patients (P<0.0005), and younger patients (P<0.0001). Major complications were reported for 1.4% of patients (<1% at centers with >300 cases), minor for 1.7%. Risk of complications increased with number of leads removed (P<0.005) and with less experienced physicians (P<0.005); risk of major complications was higher for women (P<0.01). Given physician experience, appropriate precautions, and appropriate patient selection, contemporary lead removal techniques allow success with low complication rates.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10527016     DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1999.tb00628.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol        ISSN: 0147-8389            Impact factor:   1.976


  41 in total

Review 1.  Pacemaker lead complications: when is extraction appropriate and what can we learn from published data?

Authors:  F A Bracke; A Meijer; L M van Gelder
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 5.994

2.  Replacement of extracted permanent pacemaker or defibrillator leads by cannulation of veins using the femoral "drag through" technique.

Authors:  R J Schilling
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 5.994

3.  Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator lead extraction by conventional traction and counter-traction technique.

Authors:  Jong Sung Park; Hui-Nam Pak; Moon-Hyoung Lee; Sung Soon Kim; Boyoung Joung
Journal:  Korean Circ J       Date:  2011-03-31       Impact factor: 3.243

Review 4.  Considerations for cardiac device lead extraction.

Authors:  Oussama Wazni; Bruce L Wilkoff
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2016-01-29       Impact factor: 32.419

5.  Repositioning of a dislodged and fibrosed ventricular lead.

Authors:  Ejaz M Khan; Apostolos A Voudouris; R E Hood; Stephen R Shorofsky
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 1.900

6.  Natural history of the Sprint Fidelis lead: survival analysis from a large single-center study.

Authors:  Leonidas Tzogias; Diego Bellavia; Shivi Sharma; Thomas J Donohue; Mark H Schoenfeld
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 1.900

7.  Re-evaluation of transvenous lead extraction with modified standard technique: a prospective study in 229 patients.

Authors:  Xian-Ming Chu; Xue-Bin Li; Ping Zhang; Long Wang; Ding Li; Jiang-Bo Duan; Bing Li; Ji-Hong Guo
Journal:  J Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci       Date:  2013-10-20

Review 8.  Endovascular extraction techniques for pacemaker and ICD lead extraction: Part 1.

Authors:  F A Bracke; A Meijer; B van Gelder
Journal:  Neth Heart J       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 2.380

9.  Transvenous removal of pacing and implantable cardiac defibrillating leads using single sheath mechanical dilatation and multiple venous approaches: high success rate and safety in more than 2000 leads.

Authors:  Maria Grazia Bongiorni; Ezio Soldati; Giulio Zucchelli; Andrea Di Cori; Luca Segreti; Raffaele De Lucia; Gianluca Solarino; Alberto Balbarini; Mario Marzilli; Mario Mariani
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2008-10-23       Impact factor: 29.983

10.  Deaths and cardiovascular injuries due to device-assisted implantable cardioverter-defibrillator and pacemaker lead extraction.

Authors:  Robert G Hauser; William T Katsiyiannis; Charles C Gornick; Adrian K Almquist; Linda M Kallinen
Journal:  Europace       Date:  2009-11-27       Impact factor: 5.214

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.