Literature DB >> 28895040

Clinical utility of ultra-low-dose pre-test exposure to avoid unnecessary patient exposure due to positioning errors: a simulation study.

Hideo Nose1,2, Junji Shiraishi3.   

Abstract

The use of digital radiographic systems has decreased the frequency of image retakes due to over/underexposure in general radiography. However, image retakes owing to patient positioning errors are likely to increase because of the convenience of a real-time image check on a console table. The purpose of the present study is to propose a novel radiographic examination procedure with an ultra-low-dose pre-test exposure that may be utilized to check patient positioning prior to taking an actual image, thereby reducing unnecessary patient exposure owing to image retakes. In this study, examination data from 714 knee joint radiographs, both submitted and retaken images, were included. Twelve radiological technologists (RTs) took all images. The actual total exposure dose for each patient was compared with simulated total doses utilized in the proposed procedure. The simulation assumed that each examination was completed following pre-test exposure. Therefore, this method did not involve retaking images although at least one pre-test exposure had been applied to all patients. Pre-test exposures at four dose levels corresponding to 25, 10, 5, and 2% of the actual exposure dose were evaluated to determine whether each dose level could be used to check patient positioning. The results indicated that when the pre-test exposure dose rate was 10% or lower, the total exposure dose reduction equaled or exceeded 8% for all patients. The use of the proposed procedure reduced the total exposure dose for all patients when compared to the exposure dose calculated from records.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Flat-panel detector; Patient dose; Positioning error; Repeat rate

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28895040     DOI: 10.1007/s12194-017-0422-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol        ISSN: 1865-0333


  7 in total

1.  Comparative reject analysis in conventional film-screen and digital storage phosphor radiography.

Authors:  S Peer; R Peer; M Walcher; M Pohl; W Jaschke
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Clinical comparative study with a large-area amorphous silicon flat-panel detector: image quality and visibility of anatomic structures on chest radiography.

Authors:  Christian Fink; Peter J Hallscheidt; Gerd Noeldge; Annette Kampschulte; Boris Radeleff; Waldemar P Hosch; Günter W Kauffmann; Jochen Hansmann
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 3.959

3.  Routine chest radiography using a flat-panel detector: image quality at standard detector dose and 33% dose reduction.

Authors:  Michael Strotzer; Markus Völk; Rüdiger Fründ; Okka Hamer; Niels Zorger; Stefan Feuerbach
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 4.  Image rejects/retakes--radiographic challenges.

Authors:  D Waaler; B Hofmann
Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry       Date:  2010-02-16       Impact factor: 0.972

5.  Effect of filmless imaging on the utilization of radiologic services.

Authors:  B I Reiner; E L Siegel; C Flagle; F J Hooper; R E Cox; M Scanlon
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  Reducing radiation exposure from survey CT scans.

Authors:  Jennifer C O'Daniel; Donna M Stevens; Dianna D Cody
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 3.959

7.  Film retakes in digital and conventional radiography.

Authors:  Waseem Akhtar; Mubashir Aslam; Arif Ali; Kashif Mirza; Nadeem Ahmad
Journal:  J Coll Physicians Surg Pak       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 0.711

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.