Literature DB >> 10521103

Screening for factor V Leiden mutation before prescribing combination oral contraceptives.

M D Creinin1, R Lisman, R C Strickler.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of screening for factor V Leiden mutation in women in the United States who use combination oral contraceptives.
DESIGN: Cost-effectiveness analysis.
SETTING: A national research reference laboratory, a university medical center, and an academic health center managed care organization. PATIENT(S): Women of reproductive age in the United States. INTERVENTION(S): Baseline risk estimates of venous thromboembolic disease in the general population and in carriers of factor V Leiden mutation were calculated using available data. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): The number of women who would require factor V Leiden testing and the cost of identifying this cohort to prevent one death caused by venous thromboembolic disease before prescribing combination oral contraceptives. RESULT(S): To prevent one venous thromboembolic death attributable to the use of oral contraceptives in women with factor V Leiden mutation, >92,000 carriers would need to be identified and stopped from using these pills. The estimated charge to prevent this one death would exceed $300 million. If the price of testing were discounted to 34.5% of current charges, the cost still would be between $105 million and $130 million. CONCLUSION(S): Screening for factor V Leiden mutation before prescribing combination oral contraceptives is not a cost-effective use of U.S. health care dollars. The best and most cost-effective screening tool we have is taking a thorough personal and family history related to venous thromboembolic events.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10521103     DOI: 10.1016/s0015-0282(99)00318-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fertil Steril        ISSN: 0015-0282            Impact factor:   7.329


  12 in total

Review 1.  Science, medicine, and the future. Genetic epidemiology.

Authors:  J Kaprio
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-05-06

Review 2.  Cost effectiveness of pharmacogenomics: a critical and systematic review.

Authors:  William B Wong; Josh J Carlson; Rahber Thariani; David L Veenstra
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 3.  One of these things is not like the others: the idea of precedence in health technology assessment and coverage decisions.

Authors:  Mita Giacomini
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 4.911

4.  Estimating the efficacy and efficiency of cascade genetic screening.

Authors:  M Krawczak; D N Cooper; J Schmidtke
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2001-06-26       Impact factor: 11.025

Review 5.  Genetic testing and common disorders in a public health framework: how to assess relevance and possibilities. Background Document to the ESHG recommendations on genetic testing and common disorders.

Authors:  Frauke Becker; Carla G van El; Dolores Ibarreta; Eleni Zika; Stuart Hogarth; Pascal Borry; Anne Cambon-Thomsen; Jean Jacques Cassiman; Gerry Evers-Kiebooms; Shirley Hodgson; A Cécile J W Janssens; Helena Kaariainen; Michael Krawczak; Ulf Kristoffersson; Jan Lubinski; Christine Patch; Victor B Penchaszadeh; Andrew Read; Wolf Rogowski; Jorge Sequeiros; Lisbeth Tranebjaerg; Irene M van Langen; Helen Wallace; Ron Zimmern; Jörg Schmidtke; Martina C Cornel
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 4.246

Review 6.  Role of thrombophilia testing: con.

Authors:  Scott M Stevens
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 2.300

Review 7.  Testing for thrombophilia: an evidence-based approach.

Authors:  L Merriman; M Greaves
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 2.401

Review 8.  Risks and benefits of hormone replacement therapy: the evidence speaks.

Authors:  Karin H Humphries; Sabrina Gill
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2003-04-15       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 9.  Pharmacogenetics: the therapeutic drug monitoring of the future?

Authors:  M H Ensom; T K Chang; P Patel
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 5.577

Review 10.  A Systematic Review of Economic Evaluations of Pharmacogenetic Testing for Prevention of Adverse Drug Reactions.

Authors:  Catrin O Plumpton; Daniel Roberts; Munir Pirmohamed; Dyfrig A Hughes
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 4.981

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.