Literature DB >> 18095023

Severe and fatal complications after ERCP: analysis of 2555 procedures in a single experienced center.

P Salminen1, S Laine, R Gullichsen.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: The majority of recent large series on endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) complications have been multicenter studies reflecting varying degrees of experience and ERCP volume; major ERCP complications are associated with low case volume. The aim of this study was to report and analyze the frequency of severe and fatal complications associated with ERCP at a single specialized surgical high-volume referral center (Turku University Central Hospital).
METHODS: All scheduled ERCP procedures (n = 2788) at our unit between January 1997 and December 2005 were included and the procedure-related severe and fatal complications were assessed by retrospective chart review. Complications were classified as severe or fatal according to standardized guidelines.
RESULTS: The number of ERCP procedures performed was 2555, of which 71% were therapeutic and 29% were diagnostic. Seventeen (0.8%) severe complications were identified in 16 patients, of whom 15 underwent a therapeutic endoscopic procedure. Of the 17 severe complications, perforation constituted five cases (0.2%), pancreatitis occurred in five patients (0.2%), bleeding in five cases (0.2%), and two patients suffered from purulent cholangitis (0.1%). Procedure-related mortality was 0.08% (n = 3).
CONCLUSIONS: In our study the rate of severe or fatal complications of ERCP is low in experienced hands at a high-volume center, comparing favorably to corresponding complication rates of multicenter series, which further supports the importance of centralizing ERCP procedures in high-volume advanced centers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18095023     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-007-9711-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  15 in total

1.  Complications of diagnostic and therapeutic ERCP: a prospective multicenter study.

Authors:  E Masci; G Toti; A Mariani; S Curioni; A Lomazzi; M Dinelli; G Minoli; C Crosta; U Comin; A Fertitta; A Prada; G R Passoni; P A Testoni
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 10.864

2.  Major early complications from diagnostic and therapeutic ERCP: a prospective multicenter study.

Authors:  S Loperfido; G Angelini; G Benedetti; F Chilovi; F Costan; F De Berardinis; M De Bernardin; A Ederle; P Fina; A Fratton
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 9.427

Review 3.  Complications of endoscopic sphincterotomy.

Authors:  M L Freeman
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 10.093

Review 4.  ERCP and biliary endoscopic sphincterotomy-induced pancreatitis.

Authors:  K Gottlieb; S Sherman
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am       Date:  1998-01

5.  Complications of endoscopic sphincterotomy: results from a single tertiary referral center.

Authors:  M Barthet; N Lesavre; A Desjeux; M Gasmi; P Berthezene; S Berdah; X Viviand; J C Grimaud
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 10.093

6.  Risk factors for post-ERCP pancreatitis: a prospective multicenter study.

Authors:  Chi-Liang Cheng; Stuart Sherman; James L Watkins; Jeffrey Barnett; Martin Freeman; Joseph Geenen; Michael Ryan; Harrison Parker; James T Frakes; Evan L Fogel; William B Silverman; Kulwinder S Dua; Giuseppe Aliperti; Paul Yakshe; Michael Uzer; Whitney Jones; John Goff; Laura Lazzell-Pannell; Abdullah Rashdan; M'hamed Temkit; Glen A Lehman
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 10.864

7.  Analysis of the risk factors associated with endoscopic sphincterotomy techniques: preliminary results of a prospective study, with emphasis on the reduced risk of acute pancreatitis with low-dose anticoagulation treatment.

Authors:  T Rabenstein; H T Schneider; D Bulling; M Nicklas; A Katalinic; E G Hahn; P Martus; C Ell
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 10.093

8.  ERCP-related perforations: risk factors and management.

Authors:  R Enns; M A Eloubeidi; K Mergener; P S Jowell; M S Branch; T M Pappas; J Baillie
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 10.093

9.  Complications of endoscopic sphincterotomy. A prospective series with emphasis on the increased risk associated with sphincter of Oddi dysfunction and nondilated bile ducts.

Authors:  S Sherman; T A Ruffolo; R H Hawes; G A Lehman
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 22.682

Review 10.  Understanding risk factors and avoiding complications with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography.

Authors:  Martin L Freeman
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2003-04
View more
  27 in total

Review 1.  Meta-analysis of one- vs. two-stage laparoscopic/endoscopic management of common bile duct stones.

Authors:  Nicholas Alexakis; Saxon Connor
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2012-02-03       Impact factor: 3.647

2.  ERCP and endoscopic sphincterotomy (ES): a safe and definitive management of gallstone pancreatitis with the gallbladder left in situ.

Authors:  Mark Bignell; Matthew Dearing; Andrew Hindmarsh; Michael Rhodes
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2011-10-18       Impact factor: 3.452

3.  Partially covered vs uncovered sphincterotome and post-endoscopic sphincterotomy bleeding.

Authors:  Panagiotis Katsinelos; George Paroutoglou; Jannis Kountouras; Grigoris Chatzimavroudis; Christos Zavos; Sotiris Terzoudis; Taxiarchis Katsinelos; Kostas Fasoulas; George Gelas; George Tzovaras; Ioannis Pilpilidis
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-10-28       Impact factor: 5.742

4.  Surgical control of life-threatening post-ERCP bleeding with a gelatin matrix-thrombin hemostatic agent.

Authors:  Dimitrios Dimitroulis; Efstathios Antoniou; Nikolaos P Karidis; Konstantinos Kontzoglou; Gregory Kouraklis
Journal:  Int J Surg Case Rep       Date:  2012-06-02

5.  EUS and ERCP complication rates are not increased in elderly patients.

Authors:  Mark E Benson; Siobhan Byrne; Donald J Brust; Bradley Manning; Patrick R Pfau; Terrence J Frick; Mark Reichelderfer; Deepak V Gopal
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2010-02-26       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 6.  Transcystic or transductal stone extraction during single-stage treatment of choledochocystolithiasis: a systematic review.

Authors:  Jan Siert K Reinders; Dirk J Gouma; Dirk T Ubbink; Bert van Ramshorst; Djamila Boerma
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 3.352

7.  Endoscopic management of post-cholecystectomy biliary fistula.

Authors:  Michael W Hii; David E Gyorki; Kentaro Sakata; Richard J Cade; Simon W Banting
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2011-07-19       Impact factor: 3.647

8.  Accuracy of magnetic resonance cholangiography compared to operative endoscopy in detecting biliary stones, a single center experience and review of literature.

Authors:  Francesco A Polistina; Mauro Frego; Marco Bisello; Emy Manzi; Antonella Vardanega; Bortolo Perin
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2015-04-28

9.  No Benefit of Oral Diclofenac on Post-Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography Pancreatitis.

Authors:  Hirotoshi Ishiwatari; Takahiro Urata; Ichiro Yasuda; Shimpei Matsusaki; Hiroyuki Hisai; Hiroshi Kawakami; Michihiro Ono; Takuji Iwashita; Shinpei Doi; Kazumichi Kawakubo; Tsuyoshi Hayashi; Tomoko Sonoda; Naoya Sakamoto; Junji Kato
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2016-07-22       Impact factor: 3.199

10.  Non-trauma Emergency Pancreatoduodenectomies: A Single-Center Retrospective Analysis.

Authors:  Michael F Nentwich; M Reeh; F G Uzunoglu; K Bachmann; M Bockhorn; J R Izbicki; Y K Vashist
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 3.352

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.